World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
10975
World Ranking
6132
National Ranking
28

Tom Eichele publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Eichele sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 103 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Tom Eichele D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Eichele sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tom Eichele is affiliated with Haukeland University Hospital in Norway, where their research primarily focuses on neuroscience. Their scholarly work spans key areas such as neurology and cognitive neuroscience.

Their research encompasses topics including:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Eichele has contributed to multiple publications, with recent papers highlighting advances in both clinical and experimental neuroscience. Notable papers include:

  • Hjerneovervåking i sykehusene må styrkes (2021), published in Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation treatment reduces, while repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment increases electroencephalography spike rates with refractory occipital lobe epilepsy: A case study (2025), published in Epilepsia Open

Their frequent coauthors reflect collaborative work across relevant subfields and include:

  • Anne Hege Aamodt
  • Erik Taubøll
  • Luis Romundstad
  • Angelika Sorteberg
  • Sean Wallace

Eichele's work has appeared mainly in venues such as:

  • Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening
  • Epilepsia Open

Their research contributions align with main fields of study like neuroscience and extend into subfields such as neurology and cognitive neuroscience, providing insights into both brain function modulation and clinical neurological conditions.

Best Publications

  • A Baseline for the Multivariate Comparison of Resting-State Networks

    Elena A. Allen;Erik B. Erhardt;Eswar Damaraju;William Gruner;William Gruner

  • Selective changes of resting-state networks in individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease

    Christian Sorg;Valentin Riedl;Valentin Riedl;Mark Mühlau;Vince D. Calhoun

  • Prediction of human errors by maladaptive changes in event-related brain networks.

    Tom Eichele;Stefan Debener;Vince D. Calhoun;Vince D. Calhoun;Vince D. Calhoun;Karsten Specht;Karsten Specht

  • Semi-automatic identification of independent components representing EEG artifact.

    Filipa Campos Viola;Jeremy Thorne;Barrie Edmonds;Till Schneider

  • Assessing the spatiotemporal evolution of neuronal activation with single-trial event-related potentials and functional MRI

    Tom Eichele;Karsten Specht;Matthias Moosmann;Marijtje L. A. Jongsma

  • Methods for Simultaneous EEG-fMRI: An Introductory Review

    René J. Huster;Stefan Debener;Tom Eichele;Christoph S. Herrmann

  • Posterior medial frontal cortex activity predicts post-error adaptations in task-related visual and motor areas

    Claudia Danielmeier;Tom Eichele;Birte U. Forstmann;Marc Tittgemeyer

  • Functional Brain Networks in Schizophrenia: A Review

    Vince D. Calhoun;Tom Eichele;Godfrey Pearlson

  • Visual activation of auditory cortex reflects maladaptive plasticity in cochlear implant users

    Pascale Sandmann;Norbert Dillier;Tom Eichele;Tom Eichele;Martin Meyer

  • EEG Signatures of Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity States

    E. A. Allen;E. Damaraju;E. Damaraju;T. Eichele;T. Eichele;L. Wu

  • SimTB, a simulation toolbox for fMRI data under a model of spatiotemporal separability

    Erik B. Erhardt;Elena A. Allen;Yonghua Wei;Tom Eichele;Tom Eichele

  • Capturing inter-subject variability with group independent component analysis of fMRI data: a simulation study.

    Elena A. Allen;Erik B. Erhardt;Erik B. Erhardt;Yonghua Wei;Tom Eichele;Tom Eichele

  • Neural Correlates of Trial-to-Trial Fluctuations in Response Caution

    L. van Maanen;S.D. Brown;T. Eichele;E.-J. Wagenmakers

  • Reciprocal relations between cognitive neuroscience and formal cognitive models: opposites attract?

    Birte U. Forstmann;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Tom Eichele;Scott Brown

  • Multi-set canonical correlation analysis for the fusion of concurrent single trial ERP and functional MRI

    Nicolle M. Correa;Tom Eichele;Tülay Adali;Yi Ou Li

  • Analysis of Multimodal Neuroimaging Data

    Felix Biessmann;Sergey Plis;Frank C. Meinecke;Tom Eichele

  • Cortico-striatal connectivity and cognition in normal aging: A combined DTI and resting state fMRI study

    Martin Ystad;Erlend Hodneland;Steinunn Adolfsdottir;Judit Haász;Judit Haász

  • Joint independent component analysis for simultaneous EEG–fMRI: Principle and simulation

    Matthias Moosmann;Tom Eichele;Helge Nordby;Kenneth Hugdahl;Kenneth Hugdahl

  • Subcortical functional connectivity and verbal episodic memory in healthy elderly--a resting state fMRI study.

    Martin Ystad;Tom Eichele;Astri J. Lundervold;Arvid Lundervold;Arvid Lundervold

  • EEGIFT: group independent component analysis for event-related EEG data

    Tom Eichele;Srinivas Rachakonda;Brage Brakedal;Rune Eikeland

  • Unmixing concurrent EEG-fMRI with parallel independent component analysis.

    Tom Eichele;Vince D. Calhoun;Vince D. Calhoun;Vince D. Calhoun;Matthias Moosmann;Karsten Specht

Frequent Co-Authors

Vince D. Calhoun
Vince D. Calhoun Georgia State University
Kenneth Hugdahl
Kenneth Hugdahl University of Bergen
Karsten Specht
Karsten Specht University of Bergen
Kerstin J. Plessen
Kerstin J. Plessen University of Lausanne
Tulay Adali
Tulay Adali University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Elena A. Allen
Elena A. Allen Mind Research Network
Kent A. Kiehl
Kent A. Kiehl University of New Mexico
Markus Ullsperger
Markus Ullsperger Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Rodrigo Quian Quiroga
Rodrigo Quian Quiroga University of Leicester
Stefan Debener
Stefan Debener Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Tom Eichele

Trending Scientists