World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8508 7945 392 385 163 7467

Regina Steil publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Regina Steil between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Regina Steil published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2023. 30 of the 226 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2023. 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 18 publications
1995 2025

226 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Regina Steil: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 2
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 0
2000 2
2001 0
2002 2
2003 2
2004 0
2005 3
2006 0
2007 1
2008 2
2009 5
2010 2
2011 12
2012 10
2013 11
2014 12
2015 9
2016 9
2017 12
2018 9
2019 19
2020 13
2021 19
2022 16
2023 23
2024 12
2025 18
Total 226
Download as CSV

Regina Steil publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Regina Steil sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 163 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 163
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Regina Steil D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Regina Steil sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Regina Steil is affiliated with Goethe University Frankfurt in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a particular focus on clinical psychology. Their research encompasses areas such as child abuse and trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder, migration, health and trauma, and psychosocial and emotional development in children and adolescents.

They have published numerous papers in prominent journals, including recent works such as:

  • Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (DBT-PTSD) Compared With Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) in Complex Presentations of PTSD in Women Survivors of Childhood Abuse, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Influence of Severity of Type and Timing of Retrospectively Reported Childhood Maltreatment on Female Amygdala and Hippocampal Volume, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Treating adults with a dual diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder related to childhood abuse: Results from a randomized clinical trial., 2021, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • A clinician rating to diagnose CPTSD according to ICD-11 and to evaluate CPTSD symptom severity: Complex PTSD Item Set additional to the CAPS (COPISAC), 2021, European journal of psychotraumatology
  • Health-Related Quality of Life and Costs of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Adolescents and Young Adults in Germany, 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry

Frequent collaborators in their research include Meike Müller-Engelmann, Rita Rosner, Kathlen Priebe, Nikolaus Kleindienst, and Babette Renneberg. These collaborations contribute to the interdisciplinary nature of Steil's work and connect different aspects of psychological trauma and therapeutic interventions.

Their work has been published prominently in venues such as the European journal of psychotraumatology, BMC Psychiatry, Verhaltenstherapie, PsycTESTS Dataset, and JAMA Psychiatry.

Steil has also contributed to academic literature through book publications, including a title in the series "Manuale zu Testverfahren und Fragebögen" with the "CAPS-5 Manual" published in 2023.

Their research covers several key topics:

  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Steil's fields of study further include multiple subfields, predominately Clinical Psychology, but also Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Psychiatry and Mental health.

Best Publications

  • The short version of the Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23): development and initial data on psychometric properties.

    Martin Bohus;Nikolaus Kleindienst;Matthias F. Limberger;Rolf-Dieter Stieglitz

  • Maintenance of Intrusive Memories in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Cognitive Approach

    Anke Ehlers;Regina Steil

  • The nature of intrusive memories after trauma: the warning signal hypothesis.

    Anke Ehlers;Ann Hackmann;Regina Steil;Sue Clohessy

  • Dysfunctional meaning of posttraumatic intrusions in chronic PTSD

    Regina Steil;Anke Ehlers

  • Dialectical behaviour therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder after childhood sexual abuse in patients with and without borderline personality disorder: a randomised controlled trial.

    Martin Bohus;Anne S Dyer;Kathlen Priebe;Antje Krüger

  • Dialectical behavior therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder related to childhood sexual abuse: a pilot study of an intensive residential treatment program.

    Regina Steil;Anne Dyer;Kathlen Priebe;Nikolaus Kleindienst

  • A meta-analytic review of the efficacy of drug treatment in generalized anxiety disorder.

    Kristin Mitte;Peter Noack;Regina Steil;Martin Hautzinger

  • Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (DBT-PTSD) Compared With Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) in Complex Presentations of PTSD in Women Survivors of Childhood Abuse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Martin Bohus;Martin Bohus;Nikolaus Kleindienst;Christopher Hahn;Meike Müller-Engelmann

  • Psychological Treatments for Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: A Meta-Analysis

    Jana Gutermann;Franziska Schreiber;Simone Matulis;Laura Schwartzkopff

  • Aetiology and treatment of nightmare disorder: State of the art and future perspectives

    Annika Gieselmann;Malik Ait Aoudia;Michelle Carr;Anne Germain

  • Specificity of affective instability in patients with borderline personality disorder compared to posttraumatic stress disorder, bulimia nervosa, and healthy controls.

    Philip Santangelo;Iris Reinhard;Lutz Mussgay;Regina Steil

  • Efficacy of psychological interventions aiming to reduce chronic nightmares: a meta-analysis.

    Kathrin Hansen;Volkmar Höfling;Tana Kröner-Borowik;Ulrich Stangier

  • The Psychometric Properties of the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills in Clinical Populations.

    Corinna Baum;Willem Kuyken;Martin Bohus;Thomas Heidenreich

  • State dissociation moderates response to dialectical behavior therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in women with and without borderline personality disorder

    Nikolaus Kleindienst;Kathlen Priebe;Nora Görg;Anne Dyer

  • Disgust and implicit self-concept in women with borderline personality disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Nicolas Rüsch;Nicolas Rüsch;Daniela Schulz;Gabi Valerius;Regina Steil

  • Discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-esteem among adolescents with social anxiety disorder

    Franziska Schreiber;Christiane Bohn;Idan M. Aderka;Ulrich Stangier

  • Pain sensitivity is reduced in borderline personality disorder, but not in posttraumatic stress disorder and bulimia nervosa.

    Christian Schmahl;Miriam Meinzer;Andrea Zeuch;Manfred Fichter

  • Developmentally adapted cognitive processing therapy for adolescents suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder after childhood sexual or physical abuse: a pilot study.

    Simone Matulis;Patricia A. Resick;Rita Rosner;Regina Steil

  • Kurzversion der Borderline-Symptom-Liste (BSL-23): Entwicklung und Überprüfung der psychometrischen Eigenschaften

    Martina Wolf;Matthias F. Limberger;Nikolaus Kleindienst;Rolf-Dieter Stieglitz

  • Effect of Developmentally Adapted Cognitive Processing Therapy for Youth With Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder After Childhood Sexual and Physical Abuse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Rita Rosner;Eline Rimane;Ulrich Frick;Jana Gutermann

Frequent Co-Authors

Rita Rosner
Rita Rosner Catholic University of America
Martin Bohus
Martin Bohus Central Institute of Mental Health
Nikolaus Kleindienst
Nikolaus Kleindienst Heidelberg University
Ulrich Stangier
Ulrich Stangier Goethe University Frankfurt
Babette Renneberg
Babette Renneberg Freie Universität Berlin
Christian Schmahl
Christian Schmahl Heidelberg University
Thomas Fydrich
Thomas Fydrich Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Patricia A. Resick
Patricia A. Resick Duke University
Anke Ehlers
Anke Ehlers University of Oxford
Winfried Rief
Winfried Rief Philipp University of Marburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in psychology unlocks a variety of online degree options and career pathways in the USA. One prominent path is working as a substance abuse counselor, a rapidly growing field that plays a crucial role in supporting individuals struggling with addiction.

Requirements for becoming a substance abuse counselor vary by location. For example, if you’re considering becoming a substance abuse counselor in Phoenix, you’ll need to meet specific certification and supervised experience criteria. Similarly, the process of becoming a substance abuse counselor in Pittsburgh involves tailored state licensing and education requirements.

Prospective counselors in Texas should be aware of the substance abuse counselor requirements in Plano, which may include specific coursework, examinations, and fieldwork. Meanwhile, those interested in Florida can learn more about the Port St. Lucie substance abuse counselors education requirements, focusing on local standards and specialized training.

Exploring these online degrees and understanding regional licensure helps students tailor their education for a rewarding career in mental health and substance abuse counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Regina Steil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles