World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
11400
World Ranking
6103
National Ranking
285

Klaus Bengler publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Bengler sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 447 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Klaus Bengler D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Klaus Bengler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Klaus Bengler is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their research focuses primarily on engineering and psychology, with a significant emphasis on social psychology, safety, risk, reliability and quality, as well as automotive engineering. Additional areas of study include biomedical engineering and industrial and manufacturing engineering.

The central topics in Bengler's work involve human-automation interaction and safety, traffic and road safety, safety warnings and signage, autonomous vehicle technology and safety, ergonomics and human factors, transportation and mobility innovations, and occupational health and safety research.

They have contributed numerous publications across various venues, with frequent appearances in the following:

  • AHFE international
  • Information
  • Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft
  • Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Bengler include:

  • From HMI to HMIs: Towards an HMI Framework for Automated Driving, 2020, Information
  • After you?! - Use of external human-machine interfaces in road bottleneck scenarios, 2020, Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • Taking Over Control from Highly Automated Vehicles, 2021, AHFE international
  • Safety of automated driving: The need for a systems approach and application of the Functional Resonance Analysis Method, 2020, Safety Science
  • Communication via motion - Suitability of automated vehicle movements to negotiate the right of way in road bottleneck scenarios, 2021, Applied Ergonomics

Frequent collaborators in Bengler's research include:

  • Alexander Feierle
  • Bianca Biebl
  • Niklas Grabbe
  • Naomi Y. Mbelekani
  • Michael Rettenmaier

This combination of topics, venues, and collaborations reflects an interdisciplinary approach centered on understanding and improving the interaction between humans and automated or semi-automated systems in transportation contexts. Their work integrates psychological and engineering perspectives to address complex challenges related to vehicle safety, human-machine interaction, and ergonomics.

Best Publications

  • Three Decades of Driver Assistance Systems: Review and Future Perspectives

    Klaus Bengler;Klaus Dietmayer;Berthold Farber;Markus Maurer

  • “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?:

    Christian Gold;Daniel Damböck;Lutz Lorenz;Klaus Bengler

  • Trust in Automation – Before and After the Experience of Take-over Scenarios in a Highly Automated Vehicle☆

    Christian Gold;Moritz Körber;Christoph Hohenberger;David Lechner

  • A human factors perspective on automated driving

    M. Kyriakidis;J.C.F. de Winter;N Stanton;T. Bellet

  • Vigilance Decrement and Passive Fatigue Caused by Monotony in Automated Driving

    Moritz Körber;Andrea Cingel;Markus Zimmermann;Klaus Bengler

  • The influence of age on the take-over of vehicle control in highly automated driving

    Moritz Körber;Christian Gold;David Lechner;Klaus Bengler

  • Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles.

    Christian Gold;Riender Happee;Klaus Bengler

  • Towards cooperative guidance and control of highly automated vehicles: H-Mode and Conduct-by-Wire.

    Frank Ole Flemisch;Klaus Bengler;Heiner Bubb;Hermann Winner

  • Concept and development of a unified ontology for generating test and use-case catalogues for assisted and automated vehicle guidance

    Sebastian Geyer;Marcel Baltzer;Benjamin Franz;Stephan Hakuli

  • From HMI to HMIs: Towards an HMI Framework for Automated Driving

    Klaus Bengler;Michael Rettenmaier;Nicole Fritz;Alexander Feierle

  • Human Centered Assistance Applications for the working environment of the future

    Jonas Schmidtler;Verena Knott;Christin Hölzel;Klaus Bengler

  • Vibrotactile Displays: A Survey With a View on Highly Automated Driving

    Sebastiaan M. Petermeijer;Joost C. F. de Winter;Klaus J. Bengler

  • Automotive Technology and Human Factors Research: Past, Present, and Future

    Motoyuki Akamatsu;Paul Green;Klaus Bengler

  • Rolling Out the Red (and Green) Carpet: Supporting Driver Decision Making in Automation-to-Manual Transitions

    Alexander Eriksson;Sebastiaan M. Petermeijer;Markus Zimmermann;Joost C. F. de Winter

  • How the Duration of Automated Driving Influences Take-Over Performance and Gaze Behavior

    Anna Feldhütter;Christian Gold;Sonja Schneider;Klaus Bengler

  • Utilization of Drivetime – Performing Non-Driving Related Tasks While Driving Highly Automated:

    Christian Gold;Ilirjan Berisha;Klaus Bengler

  • Ubernahmezeiten beim hochautomatisierten Autofahren

    Daniel Damböck;M. Farid;L. Tönert;Klaus Bengler

  • Eye Gaze Studies Comparing Head-Up and Head-Down Displays in Vehicles

    M. Ablassmeier;T. Poitschke;F. Wallhoff;K. Bengler

  • Evaluation of in-vehicle HMI using occlusion techniques: experimental results and practical implications.

    Michele Baumann;Andreas Keinath;Josef F. Krems;Klaus Bengler

  • Understanding and Applying the Concept of “Driver Availability” in Automated Driving

    Claus Marberger;Holger Mielenz;Frederik Naujoks;Jonas Radlmayr

  • Taking Over Control from Highly Automated Vehicles

    C. Gold;Klaus Bengler

Frequent Co-Authors

Josef F. Krems
Josef F. Krems Chemnitz University of Technology
Thomas Müller
Thomas Müller Ruhr University Bochum
Christoph Stiller
Christoph Stiller Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Frederik Naujoks
Frederik Naujoks BMW Group (Germany)
Klaus Dietmayer
Klaus Dietmayer University of Ulm
Joost C. F. de Winter
Joost C. F. de Winter Delft University of Technology
Geert Wets
Geert Wets Hasselt University
Albrecht Schmidt
Albrecht Schmidt Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Neville A. Stanton
Neville A. Stanton University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to many related degrees and flexible career pathways. Students often look for affordable programs and quick upskilling opportunities to stay competitive in the tech market.

For those interested in data analytics, finding what is the cheapest data science course in the us? can help minimize tuition costs while building valuable skills. Alternatively, aspiring engineers may seek out accredited online electrical engineering programs to earn a respected qualification remotely.

Not everyone has time for a full degree. Students looking to quickly boost their credentials should explore quick certifications that pay well—these can often be completed faster and open doors to entry-level tech jobs.

For those aiming higher, an advanced degree can be earned in less time with the quickest masters degree online options, combining graduate-level knowledge with scheduling flexibility.

Whether seeking affordable courses, online degrees, or rapid re-skilling, there are more options than ever to launch or advance your technology career from anywhere in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Klaus Bengler

Trending Scientists