World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bryan Reimer

Bryan Reimer

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
50
Citations
9514
World Ranking
4085
National Ranking
1176

Bryan Reimer publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan Reimer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 253 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Bryan Reimer D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan Reimer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bryan Reimer is affiliated with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the United States. Their research intersects the fields of Psychology and Engineering, with a balanced portfolio of 48 publications in each field. Within these areas, they focus on subfields including Social Psychology, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Automotive Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation.

The scientist's primary research themes center on Human-Automation Interaction and Safety, Traffic and Road Safety, Safety Warnings and Signage, Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety, Older Adults Driving Studies, Traffic Control and Management, and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology.

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Bryan Reimer include:

  • A model for naturalistic glance behavior around Tesla Autopilot disengagements, 2021, Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • Disengagement from driving when using automation during a 4-week field trial, 2021, Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • Driver behavior and the use of automation in real-world driving, 2021, Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • Interdependence in Vehicle-Pedestrian Encounters and its Implications for Vehicle Automation, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
  • Driver-Pedestrian Perceptual Models Demonstrate Coupling: Implications for Vehicle Automation, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems

Bryan Reimer frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
  • Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • Traffic Injury Prevention
  • Ergonomics

Key co-authors collaborating with Bryan Reimer include Bruce Mehler, Pnina Gershon, T. Zach Noonan, Ian J. Reagan, and Jessica B. Cicchino. The collaboration counts range notably from seven to thirty-seven joint works.

The scientist's research contributions provide insights into driver behavior, automation disengagement, vehicle-pedestrian interactions, and perceptual coupling relevant to the development and safety assessments of automated vehicle technologies.

Best Publications

  • Impact of Incremental Increases in Cognitive Workload on Physiological Arousal and Performance in Young Adult Drivers

    Bruce Mehler;Bryan Reimer;Joseph F. Coughlin;Jeffery A. Dusek

  • Sensitivity of physiological measures for detecting systematic variations in cognitive demand from a working memory task: an on-road study across three age groups.

    Bruce Mehler;Bryan Reimer;Joseph F. Coughlin

  • Models for recycling electronics end-of-life products

    Manbir S. Sodhi;Bryan Reimer

  • Older Adult Perceptions of Smart Home Technologies: Implications for Research, Policy & Market Innovations in Healthcare

    J.F. Coughlin;L.A. D'Ambrosio;B. Reimer;M.R. Pratt

  • Impact of Cognitive Task Complexity on Drivers' Visual Tunneling

    Bryan Reimer

  • Glance analysis of driver eye movements to evaluate distraction.

    Manbir Sodhi;Bryan Reimer;Ignacio Llamazares

  • The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing

    Yanfu Wang;Bruce Mehler;Bryan Reimer;Vincent Lammers

  • The Impact of Cognitive Workload on Physiological Arousal in Young Adult Drivers: A Field Study and Simulation Validation

    Bryan Reimer;Bruce Mehler

  • MIT Advanced Vehicle Technology Study: Large-Scale Naturalistic Driving Study of Driver Behavior and Interaction With Automation

    Lex Fridman;Daniel E. Brown;Michael Glazer;William Angell

  • Classifying driver workload using physiological and driving performance data: two field studies

    Erin T. Solovey;Marin Zec;Enrique Abdon Garcia Perez;Bryan Reimer

  • A Field Study on the Impact of Variations in Short-Term Memory Demands on Drivers’ Visual Attention and Driving Performance Across Three Age Groups

    Bryan Reimer;Bruce Mehler;Ying Wang;Joseph F. Coughlin

  • Using self-reported data to assess the validity of driving simulation data.

    Bryan Reimer;Bryan Reimer;Lisa A. D’Ambrosio;Joseph F. Coughlin;Michael E. Kafrissen

  • Driver Gaze Region Estimation without Use of Eye Movement

    Lex Fridman;Philipp Langhans;Joonbum Lee;Bryan Reimer

  • The sensitivity of different methodologies for characterizing drivers’ gaze concentration under increased cognitive demand

    Ying Wang;Ying Wang;Bryan Reimer;Jonathan Dobres;Bruce Mehler

  • Monitoring, managing, and motivating driver safety and well-being

    J. F. Coughlin;B. Reimer;B. Mehler

  • Behavior differences in drivers with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: the driving behavior questionnaire.

    Bryan Reimer;Lisa A. D’Ambrosio;Jennifer Gilbert;Joseph F. Coughlin

  • Autonomous Vehicles and Alternatives to Driving: Trust, Preferences, and Effects of Age

    Hillary Abraham;Chaiwoo Lee;Samantha Brady;Craig Fitzgerald

  • Cognitive Load Estimation in the Wild

    Lex Fridman;Bryan Reimer;Bruce Mehler;William T. Freeman

  • More than the Useful Field: Considering peripheral vision in driving

    Benjamin Wolfe;Jonathan Dobres;Ruth Rosenholtz;Bryan Reimer

  • Driver Assistance Systems and the Transition to Automated Vehicles: A Path to Increase Older Adult Safety and Mobility?

    Bryan Reimer

  • On-road driver eye movement tracking using head-mounted devices

    M. Sodhi;B. Reimer;J. L. Cohen;E. Vastenburg

  • Characterizing impaired driving in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A controlled study.

    Ronna Fried;Carter R. Petty;Craig B. Surman;Bryan Reimer

  • An investigation of the relationship between the driving behavior questionnaire and objective measures of highway driving behavior

    Nan Zhao;Nan Zhao;Bruce Mehler;Bryan Reimer;Lisa A. D’Ambrosio

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronna Fried
Ronna Fried Harvard University
Shamsi T. Iqbal
Shamsi T. Iqbal Microsoft (United States)
Ivan Tashev
Ivan Tashev Microsoft (United States)
Björn Schuller
Björn Schuller Imperial College London
Linda Ng Boyle
Linda Ng Boyle University of Washington
John D. Lee
John D. Lee University of Wisconsin–Madison
Gavriel Salvendy
Gavriel Salvendy University of Central Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Bryan Reimer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles