World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ruth Rosenholtz

Ruth Rosenholtz

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
8209
World Ranking
10058
National Ranking
4241

Ruth Rosenholtz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth Rosenholtz sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 137 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ruth Rosenholtz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth Rosenholtz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ruth Rosenholtz is a researcher primarily affiliated with MIT in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields of study including Computer Science and Neuroscience with substantial contributions to subfields such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality.

The research topics covered by Rosenholtz focus extensively on aspects of human visual perception and attention. Key topics include:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Safety Warnings and Signage
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Face Recognition and Perception

Their publication record includes papers in well-regarded venues, frequently contributing to the following journals:

  • Journal of Vision
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Recent notable publications include:

  • "Peripheral vision in real-world tasks: A systematic review" (2022) in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Toward a Theory of Visual Information Acquisition in Driving" (2020) in Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  • "Demystifying visual awareness: Peripheral encoding plus limited decision complexity resolve the paradox of rich visual experience and curious perceptual failures" (2020) in Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • "Visual Attention in Crisis" (2024) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • "Superior Parietal Lobule: A Role in Relative Localization of Multiple Different Elements" (2020) in Cerebral Cortex

Rosenholtz collaborates frequently with other researchers, most notably Benjamin Wolfe, Vasha DuTell, Yelda Semizer, Christian Vater, and Simon Stent.

Best Publications

  • Measuring visual clutter.

    Ruth Rosenholtz;Yuanzhen Li;Lisa Nakano

  • Halo: a technique for visualizing off-screen objects

    Patrick Baudisch;Ruth Rosenholtz

  • Capabilities and Limitations of Peripheral Vision.

    Ruth Rosenholtz

  • A summary statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual search.

    Ruth Rosenholtz;Jie Huang;Alvin Raj;Benjamin J. Balas

  • Feature congestion: a measure of display clutter

    Ruth Rosenholtz;Yuanzhen Li;Jonathan Mansfield;Zhenlan Jin

  • Material perception: What can you see in a brief glance?

    Lavanya Sharan;Ruth Rosenholtz;Edward Adelson

  • A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion popout phenomena.

    Ruth Rosenholtz

  • Exploring features in a Bayesian framework for material recognition

    Ce Liu;Lavanya Sharan;Edward H. Adelson;Ruth Rosenholtz

  • Computing Local Surface Orientation and Shape from Texture forCurved Surfaces

    Jitendra Malik;Ruth Rosenholtz

  • Using thumbnails to search the Web

    Allison Woodruff;Andrew Faulring;Ruth Rosenholtz;Julie Morrsion

  • Visual search for arbitrary objects in real scenes

    Jeremy M. Wolfe;Jeremy M. Wolfe;George A. Alvarez;Ruth Rosenholtz;Yoana I. Kuzmova

  • Recognizing Materials Using Perceptually Inspired Features

    Lavanya Sharan;Ce Liu;Ruth Rosenholtz;Edward H. Adelson

  • Halo: a Technique for Visualizing Off-Screen Locations

    Patrick Baudisch;Ruth Rosenholtz

  • Rethinking the role of top-down attention in vision: effects attributable to a lossy representation in peripheral vision.

    Ruth Rosenholtz;Jie Huang;Krista A. Ehinger

  • Accuracy and speed of material categorization in real-world images.

    Lavanya Sharan;Ruth Rosenholtz;Edward H. Adelson

  • Search asymmetries? What search asymmetries?

    Ruth Rosenholtz

  • Iterative procedures for reduction of blocking effects in transform image coding

    Ruth Ellen Rosenholtz;Avideh Zakhor

  • More than the Useful Field: Considering peripheral vision in driving

    Benjamin Wolfe;Jonathan Dobres;Ruth Rosenholtz;Bryan Reimer

  • Do predictions of visual perception aid design

    Ruth Rosenholtz;Amal Dorai;Rosalind Freeman

  • A comparison of the use of text summaries, plain thumbnails, and enhanced thumbnails for Web search tasks

    Allison Woodruff;Ruth Rosenholtz;Julie B. Morrison;Andrew Faulring

  • Surface orientation from texture: Isotropy or homogeneity (or both)?

    Ruth Rosenholtz;Jitendra Malik

Frequent Co-Authors

Allison Woodruff
Allison Woodruff Google (United States)
Jitendra Malik
Jitendra Malik University of California, Berkeley
Ce Liu
Ce Liu Microsoft (United States)
Jeremy M. Wolfe
Jeremy M. Wolfe Brigham and Women's Hospital
George A. Alvarez
George A. Alvarez Harvard University
Patrick Baudisch
Patrick Baudisch Hasso Plattner Institute
Laure Pisella
Laure Pisella Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Chelsea Finn
Chelsea Finn Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree opens doors to various related fields and online learning opportunities. For those interested in the security aspect of technology, pursuing an accredited online cyber security degree can lead to careers in cybersecurity analysis or ethical hacking. These programs focus on digital safety and combating cyber threats.

If project leadership and the built environment are of interest, earning a cheapest construction management degree provides valuable skills in planning, budgeting, and onsite project management. This pathway suits tech-savvy professionals who enjoy organizational challenges.

Law and technology intersect in today’s world, making a masters in criminology online an appealing choice for those interested in cybercrime investigation, digital forensics, or public safety roles.

For students who wish to combine technology with financial expertise, taking online accounting classes can prepare them for careers in data-driven accountancy, auditing, or financial analysis within tech-driven industries.

These diverse yet interconnected programs offer flexible learning options and help build versatile skills for evolving career pathways in and around Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing Ruth Rosenholtz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles