World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Germany
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
83
Citations
21341
World Ranking
913
National Ranking
31

Patrick Baudisch publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Baudisch sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 280 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Patrick Baudisch D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Baudisch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2014 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Patrick Baudisch is affiliated with the Hasso Plattner Institute in Germany. Their research spans multiple disciplines, predominantly in computer science and earth and planetary sciences. They have contributed significantly to the intersection of computer vision, 3D modeling, and human-computer interaction.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Computer Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these areas, Baudisch has focused on several subfields:

  • Geology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computational Mechanics
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Their work covers a range of topics related to 3D technologies and visualization:

  • 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays

Baudisch's recent papers include:

  • "FoolProofJoint: Reducing Assembly Errors of Laser Cut 3D Models by Means of Custom Joint Patterns" (2022), presented at the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "Fabricate It or Render It? Digital Fabrication vs. Virtual Reality for Creating Objects Instantly" (2022), published in the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts
  • "Demonstrating 3D Reconstruction to Modify 2D Laser Cutting Plans" (2022), also in the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts
  • "Demonstrating FoolProofJoint: Reducing Assembly Errors of Laser Cut 3D Models by Means of Custom Joint Patterns" (2022), presented at the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts

The primary venues for their publications include:

  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

The scientist has collaborated frequently with others in their field. Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Conrad Lempert
  • Muhammad Abdullah
  • Thijs Roumen
  • Keunwoo Park
  • Shohei Katakura

In recognition of their contributions, Patrick Baudisch was awarded the ACM Distinguished Member honor in 2014.

Best Publications

  • Precise selection techniques for multi-touch screens

    Hrvoje Benko;Andrew D. Wilson;Patrick Baudisch

  • Halo: a technique for visualizing off-screen objects

    Patrick Baudisch;Ruth Rosenholtz

  • Shift: a technique for operating pen-based interfaces using touch

    Daniel Vogel;Patrick Baudisch

  • Drag-and-pop and drag-and-pick : Techniques for accessing remote screen content on touch and pen-operated systems

    P. Baudisch

  • Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices

    Patrick Baudisch;Gerry Chu

  • Lucid touch: a see-through mobile device

    Daniel Wigdor;Clifton Forlines;Patrick Baudisch;John Barnwell

  • Real-time preview system and method for panoramic images

    Chris Pal;Matthew Uyttendaele;Eric Rudolph;Patrick Baudisch

  • Stitching: pen gestures that span multiple displays

    Ken Hinckley;Gonzalo Ramos;Francois Guimbretiere;Patrick Baudisch

  • Keeping things in context: a comparative evaluation of focus plus context screens, overviews, and zooming

    Patrick Baudisch;Nathaniel Good;Victoria Bellotti;Pamela Schraedley

  • The generalized perceived input point model and how to double touch accuracy by extracting fingerprints

    Christian Holz;Patrick Baudisch

  • Understanding touch

    Christian Holz;Patrick Baudisch

  • Touch projector: mobile interaction through video

    Sebastian Boring;Dominikus Baur;Andreas Butz;Sean Gustafson

  • System and method for managing software applications in a graphical user interface

    Mary Czerwinski;Greg Smith;Brian Meyers;Patrick Markus Baudisch

  • Focus plus context screens: combining display technology with visualization techniques

    Patrick Baudisch;Nathaniel Good;Paul Stewart

  • Hover widgets: using the tracking state to extend the capabilities of pen-operated devices

    Tovi Grossman;Ken Hinckley;Patrick Baudisch;Maneesh Agrawala

  • The large-display user experience

    G. Robertson;M. Czerwinski;P. Baudisch;B. Meyers

  • Providing Haptics to Walls & Heavy Objects in Virtual Reality by Means of Electrical Muscle Stimulation

    Pedro Lopes;Sijing You;Lung-Pan Cheng;Sebastian Marwecki

  • Wedge: clutter-free visualization of off-screen locations

    Sean Gustafson;Patrick Baudisch;Carl Gutwin;Pourang Irani

  • Nenya: subtle and eyes-free mobile input with a magnetically-tracked finger ring

    Daniel Ashbrook;Patrick Baudisch;Sean White

  • Delimiters for selection-action pen gesture phrases

    Kenneth P Hinckley;Patrick M Baudisch;Gonzalo A Ramos;Francois V Guimbretiere

  • Accessing remote screen content

    Patrick M. Baudisch

Frequent Co-Authors

Ken Hinckley
Ken Hinckley Microsoft (United States)
George G. Robertson
George G. Robertson Microsoft (United States)
Mary Czerwinski
Mary Czerwinski Microsoft (United States)
Christian Holz
Christian Holz ETH Zurich
Edward Cutrell
Edward Cutrell Microsoft (United States)
Desney S. Tan
Desney S. Tan Microsoft (United States)
Andrew D. Wilson
Andrew D. Wilson Microsoft (United States)
Daniel C. Robbins
Daniel C. Robbins Microsoft (United States)
Brian R. Meyers
Brian R. Meyers Microsoft (United States)
François Guimbretière
François Guimbretière Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up a range of online education and career opportunities. For those seeking to expand their skill set, pursuing the most affordable online mba is a practical way to gain leadership and business management expertise without breaking the bank. This can be especially valuable for tech professionals aiming for management roles.

If you’re pressed for time, a 1 year masters degree online allows you to upskill rapidly and efficiently. Fast-track programs like these are tailored for working professionals looking to enhance qualifications and open doors to advanced roles.

For those interested in careers with quick entry points, there are short careers that pay well after completing brief certificate or associate programs. Many tech-adjacent roles offer high salaries without the need for lengthy degrees.

AI is transforming the field, and enrolling in the best online master's in artificial intelligence can be a smart move for those looking to specialize. This pathway supports high-demand roles in data science, machine learning, and automation.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Baudisch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles