World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
95
Citations
26720
World Ranking
474
National Ranking
259

Mary Czerwinski publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Czerwinski sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 353 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mary Czerwinski D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary Czerwinski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - ACM Fellow For contributions to human-computer interaction and leadership in the CHI community.
  • 2009 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Mary Czerwinski is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and has contributed extensively to research at the intersection of computer science and psychology. Their work spans a range of topics including digital mental health interventions, human-technology interaction, and the ethical and social impacts of artificial intelligence.

The main fields of study for this researcher are computer science and psychology, with subfields including artificial intelligence, applied psychology, sociology and political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, and social psychology.

Research topics frequently explored include the design and evaluation of digital mental health interventions, innovative methods of human-technology interaction, mental health research topics, ethics and social impacts of AI, the impact of technology on adolescents, behavioral health interventions, and topic modeling.

Mary Czerwinski has authored multiple papers, notable recent publications include:

  • Design of Digital Workplace Stress-Reduction Intervention Systems: Effects of Intervention Type and Timing, 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Building an AI That Feels: AI systems with emotional intelligence could learn faster and be more helpful, 2021, IEEE Spectrum
  • Technology ecosystems, 2020, interactions
  • Report on the future conversations workshop at CHIIR 2021, 2021, ACM SIGIR Forum
  • Find Me the Right Content! Diversity-Based Sampling of Social Media Spaces for Topic-Centric Search, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media

The frequent co-authors of Mary Czerwinski include Jina Suh, Gonzalo Ramos, Javier Hernandez, Judith Amores, and Daniel McDuff. This collaboration pattern indicates a consistent engagement with other researchers in the fields of human-computer interaction and related domains.

Publication venues where Mary Czerwinski's work frequently appears include arXiv (Cornell University), the Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM SIGIR Forum, and the Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies.

The researcher has been recognized with several awards, including being named an ACM Fellow in 2015 for contributions to human-computer interaction and leadership in the CHI community. Additionally, they were designated as an ACM Distinguished Member in 2009.

Best Publications

  • A diary study of task switching and interruptions

    Mary Czerwinski;Eric Horvitz;Susan Wilhite

  • Data mountain: using spatial memory for document management

    George Robertson;Mary Czerwinski;Kevin Larson;Daniel C. Robbins

  • Notification, Disruption, and Memory: Effects of Messaging Interruptions on Memory and Performance.

    Edward Cutrell;Mary Czerwinski;Eric Horvitz

  • Web page design: implications of memory, structure and scent for information retrieval

    Kevin Larson;Mary Czerwinski

  • Integrating collaborative messaging into an electronic mail program

    Anoop Gupta;Mary P. Czerwinski

  • Interactions with big data analytics

    Danyel Fisher;Rob DeLine;Mary Czerwinski;Steven Drucker

  • Instant Messaging and Interruption: Influence of Task Type on Performance

    Mary Czerwinski;Ed Cutrell;Eric Horvitz

  • FASTDash: a visual dashboard for fostering awareness in software teams

    Jacob T. Biehl;Mary Czerwinski;Greg Smith;George G. Robertson

  • Building segmentation based human-friendly human interaction proofs (HIPs)

    Kumar Chellapilla;Kevin Larson;Patrice Y. Simard;Mary Czerwinski

  • Toward Characterizing the Productivity Benefits of Very Large Displays

    Mary Czerwinski;Greg Smith;Tim Regan;Brian Meyers

  • The Task Gallery: a 3D window manager

    George Robertson;Maarten van Dantzich;Daniel Robbins;Mary Czerwinski

  • PhotoTOC: automatic clustering for browsing personal photographs

    J.C. Platt;M. Czerwinski;B.A. Field

  • Instant Messaging: Effects of Relevance and Timing

    Mary Czerwinski;Ed Cutrell;Eric Horvitz

  • Server system supporting collaborative messaging based on electronic mail

    Anoop Gupta;Mary Czerwinski

  • Exploring 3D navigation: combining speed-coupled flying with orbiting

    Desney S. Tan;George G. Robertson;Mary Czerwinski

  • Designing human friendly human interaction proofs (HIPs)

    Kumar Chellapilla;Kevin Larson;Patrice Simard;Mary Czerwinski

  • AffectAura: an intelligent system for emotional memory

    Daniel McDuff;Amy Karlson;Ashish Kapoor;Asta Roseway

  • Creativity support tools: Report from a U.S. National Science Foundation sponsored workshop

    Ben Shneiderman;Gerhard Fischer;Mary Czerwinski;Mitchel Resnick

  • The large-display user experience

    G. Robertson;M. Czerwinski;P. Baudisch;B. Meyers

  • Methods, apparatus and data structures for providing a user interface, which exploits spatial memory, to objects

    Mary Czerwinski;Susan T. Dumais;Susan E. Dziadosz;Daniel C. Robbins

Frequent Co-Authors

George G. Robertson
George G. Robertson Microsoft (United States)
Desney S. Tan
Desney S. Tan Microsoft (United States)
Brian R. Meyers
Brian R. Meyers Microsoft (United States)
Daniel C. Robbins
Daniel C. Robbins Microsoft (United States)
Daniel McDuff
Daniel McDuff Microsoft (United States)
Eric Horvitz
Eric Horvitz Microsoft (United States)
Gloria Mark
Gloria Mark University of California, Irvine
Raymond E. Ozzie
Raymond E. Ozzie Microsoft (United States)
Shamsi T. Iqbal
Shamsi T. Iqbal Microsoft (United States)
Patrick Baudisch
Patrick Baudisch Hasso Plattner Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up diverse online education and career options. Many students are interested in flexible learning paths designed to save time and reduce costs. For those seeking a quick entry to the workforce, consider the best associate degree in 6 months online. This accelerated route can help you build foundational skills and credentials in less than a year.

Budget is another important factor. There are a number of affordable online business degree programs and affordable online colleges that make higher education more accessible. These options provide quality learning without a heavy financial burden—even in tech and related fields.

If you have an engineering focus, explore the cheapest engineering degree online programs. Such pathways offer flexibility and affordability without compromising on curriculum or opportunity. By choosing the right online degree, you can tailor your educational journey to fit your career dreams and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Mary Czerwinski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles