World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
41
Citations
6978
World Ranking
5058
National Ranking
2387

Harold F. O'Neil publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold F. O'Neil sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 135 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Harold F. O'Neil D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold F. O'Neil sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 1980 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Harold F. O'Neil is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields including Engineering and Psychology, with specific focus on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, as well as Applied Psychology.

The main topics covered in their research include Technology Assessment and Management and Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation.

Recent publications by Harold F. O'Neil include the paper titled Measures, Metrics, and Indicators for Evaluating Technology-Based Interventions, published in 2023 in the International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Harold F. O'Neil include:

  • Eva L. Baker

They have published in the following venues:

  • International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Harold F. O'Neil has received professional recognition including the title of Fellow of the American Educational Research Association in 2008 and Fellow of the American Psychological Association in 1980.

Best Publications

  • Classification of Learning Outcomes: Evidence from the Computer Games Literature.

    Harold F. O'Neil;Richard Wainess;Eva L. Baker

  • Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction.

    John A. Kulik;Eva L. Baker;Harold F. O’Neil

  • Policy and validity prospects for performance-based assessment.

    Eva L. Baker;Harold F. O'Neil;Robert L. Linn

  • Reliability and Validity of a State Metacognitive Inventory: Potential for Alternative Assessment

    Harold F. O'Neil;Jamal Abedi

  • Technology assessment in education and training

    Eva L. Baker;Harold F. O'Neil

  • Effects of state anxiety and task difficulty on computer-assisted learning.

    Harold F. O'Neil Jr.;Charles D. Spielberger;Duncan N. Hansen

  • Reliability and validity of a computer-based knowledge mapping system to measure content understanding

    H.E Herl;H.F O'Neil;G.K.W.K Chung;J Schacter

  • Self‐regulation, goal orientation, self‐efficacy, worry, and high‐stakes math achievement for mathematically gifted high school students 1 , 2

    John R. Malpass;Harold F. O'Neil;Dennis Hocevar

  • Effects of Motivational Interventions on the National Assessment of Educational Progress Mathematics Performance

    Harold F. O'Neil;Brenda Sugrue;Eva L. Baker

  • The use of computer-based collaborative knowledge mapping to measure team processes and team outcomes

    G.K.W.K. Chung;H.F. O'Neil;H.E. Herl

  • Cognitive and affective learning strategies

    Harold F. O'Neil;Charles Donald Spielberger

  • Monetary Incentives for Low-Stakes Tests

    Harold F. O'Neil;Jamal Abedi;Judy Miyoshi;Ann Mastergeorge

  • Workforce Readiness : Competencies and Assessment

    Harold F. O'Neil

  • Construct validation of a trait self-regulation model

    Eunsook Hong;Harold F. O'Neil

  • Differential Effects of Question Formats in Math Assessment on Metacognition and Affect.

    Unknown

  • Computer-based performance assessments: a solution to the narrow measurement and reporting of problem-solving

    J. Schacter;H.E. Herl;G.K.W.K. Chung;R.A. Dennis

  • Methodological Approaches to Online Scoring of Essays.

    Gregory K. W. K. Chung;Harold F. O'Neil

  • Motivation : theory and research

    Harold F. O'Neil;Michael Drillings

  • Affective reactions toward computer-based intelligence testing.

    John J. Hedl;Harold F. O'Neil;Duncan N. Hansen

  • Instructional strategies to help learners build relevant mental models in inferential statistics

    EunSook Hong;Harold F. O'Neil

  • Computer games and team and individual learning

    Harold F. O'Neil;Ray S Perez

  • Computer-Based Collaborative Knowledge Mapping To Measure Team Processes and Team Outcomes.

    Harold F. O'Neil;Gregory K. W. K. Chung;Howard E. Herl

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles D. Spielberger
Charles D. Spielberger University of South Florida
Robert L. Linn
Robert L. Linn University of Colorado Boulder
Richard E. Mayer
Richard E. Mayer University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing a career in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to meaningful and impactful professions. With technological advancements, students can now access a range of accredited programs online, making it easier than ever to gain qualifications from anywhere in the world.

Interested in mental health and counseling? Explore cacrep-accredited online counseling programs for a solid foundation in professional counseling practices. For those passionate about supporting families, an online master's degree in marriage and family therapy prepares you to address complex relational dynamics.

If psychology intrigues you, consider a cheapest online psychology degree to study human behavior and motivations without the high tuition costs. Alternatively, a career in social work starts with programs like the masters in social work online programs tailored for those eager to make a difference in diverse communities.

These online programs offer both flexibility and affordability, helping you build relevant skills and credentials for careers in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work.

Best Scientists Citing Harold F. O'Neil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles