World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Remy M. J. P. Rikers

Remy M. J. P. Rikers

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5440 5053 260 249 118 9939

Remy M. J. P. Rikers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Remy M. J. P. Rikers between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Remy M. J. P. Rikers published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2005. 5 of the 127 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2005. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
2000 2025

127 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Remy M. J. P. Rikers: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 4
2002 2
2003 2
2004 5
2005 13
2006 6
2007 12
2008 8
2009 3
2010 6
2011 6
2012 10
2013 6
2014 4
2015 1
2016 6
2017 3
2018 4
2019 3
2020 7
2021 6
2022 3
2023 1
2024 2
2025 3
Total 127
Download as CSV

Remy M. J. P. Rikers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Remy M. J. P. Rikers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 118
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Remy M. J. P. Rikers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Remy M. J. P. Rikers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Remy M. J. P. Rikers is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands, focusing on research within Psychology and Social Sciences. Their work encompasses multiple subfields including Education, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, as well as Sociology and Political Science.

Their research touches on key topics such as Communication in Education and Healthcare, Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior, Problem and Project Based Learning, Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports, and Educational Assessment and Improvement.

Some of the recent papers linked to their field of research include:

  • Formative assessment as practice: the role of students' motivation, 2020, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
  • Building bridges in higher education: Student-faculty relationship quality, student engagement, and student loyalty, 2020, International Journal of Educational Research
  • The Effects of Problem-Based, Project-Based, and Case-Based Learning on Students' Motivation: a Meta-Analysis, 2024, Educational Psychology Review
  • Problem-Based Learning, 2020, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education
  • Relationship quality in higher education and the interplay with student engagement and loyalty, 2021, British Journal of Educational Psychology

Rikers has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Sofie M. M. Loyens
  • Lisette Wijnia
  • Ingrid Snijders
  • Martijn J. M. Leenknecht
  • Marloes L. Nederhand

Their work is regularly published in venues such as Education Sciences, Metacognition and Learning, Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, and the International Journal of Educational Research.

Best Publications

  • Self-Directed Learning in Problem-Based Learning and Its Relationships with Self-Regulated Learning.

    Sofie M. M. Loyens;Joshua Magda;Remy M. J. P. Rikers

  • How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation.

    Henk G Schmidt;Remy M J P Rikers

  • Towards a Framework for Attention Cueing in Instructional Animations: Guidelines for Research and Design

    Björn B. de Koning;Huib K. Tabbers;Remy M. J. P. Rikers;Fred Paas;Fred Paas

  • Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding?

    Björn B. de Koning;Huib K. Tabbers;Remy M.J.P. Rikers;Fred Paas;Fred Paas

  • Effect of Availability Bias and Reflective Reasoning on Diagnostic Accuracy Among Internal Medicine Residents

    Sílvia Mamede;Tamara van Gog;Kees van den Berge;Remy M. J. P. Rikers

  • Attention Cueing as a Means to Enhance Learning from an Animation

    Björn B. de Koning;Huib K. Tabbers;Remy M. J. P. Rikers;Fred Paas;Fred Paas

  • Instructional Design for Advanced Learners: Establishing Connections between the Theoretical Frameworks of Cognitive Load and Deliberate Practice

    Tamara van Gog;K. Anders Ericsson;Remy M. J. P. Rikers;Fred Paas

  • Diagnostic errors and reflective practice in medicine.

    Sílvia Mamede;Henk G. Schmidt;Remy Rikers

  • The role of basic science knowledge and clinical knowledge in diagnostic reasoning: a structural equation modeling approach.

    Anique B. H. de Bruin;Henk G. Schmidt;Remy M. J. P. Rikers

  • Formative assessment as practice: the role of students’ motivation

    Martijn Leenknecht;Lisette Wijnia;Martine Köhlen;Luke Fryer

  • Dynamic problem selection in air traffic control training : A comparison between performance, mental effort and mental efficiency

    Gino Camp;Fred Paas;Remy M. J. P. Rikers;Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer

  • Reflection as a strategy to foster medical students’ acquisition of diagnostic competence

    Sílvia Mamede;Tamara van Gog;Alexandre S Moura;Rosa M D de Faria

  • The effects of deliberate practice in undergraduate medical education

    Véronique Moulaert;Maarten G M Verwijnen;Remy Rikers;Albert J J A Scherpbier

  • Knowledge Encapsulation and the Intermediate Effect.

    Remy M.J.P. Rikers;Henk G. Schmidt;Henny P.A. Boshuizen

  • Conscious thought beats deliberation without attention in diagnostic decision-making: at least when you are an expert.

    Sílvia Mamede;Henk G. Schmidt;Remy M. J. P. Rikers;Eugene J. F. M. Custers

  • Educational Implications of Expertise Reversal Effects in Learning and Performance of Complex Cognitive and Sensorimotor Skills.

    Slava Kalyuga;Remy Rikers;Fred Paas;Fred Paas

  • Building bridges in higher education: Student-faculty relationship quality, student engagement, and student loyalty

    Ingrid Snijders;Ingrid Snijders;Lisette Wijnia;Lisette Wijnia;Remy M.J.P. Rikers;Remy M.J.P. Rikers;Sofie M.M. Loyens;Sofie M.M. Loyens

  • INSTRUCTION BASED ON INQUIRY

    Sofie M. M. Loyens;Remy M. J. P. Rikers

  • Learning by generating vs. receiving instructional explanations: Two approaches to enhance attention cueing in animations

    Björn B. de Koning;Huib K. Tabbers;Remy M. J. P. Rikers;Fred Paas

  • Instructional Compensation for Age-Related Cognitive Declines: Effects of Goal Specificity in Maze Learning

    Fred Paas;Gino Camp;Remy Rikers

  • Students' conceptions of constructivist learning: a comparison between a traditional and a problem-based learning curriculum.

    Sofie M. M. Loyens;Remy M. J. P. Rikers;Henk G. Schmidt

Frequent Co-Authors

Henk G. Schmidt
Henk G. Schmidt Erasmus University Rotterdam
Fred Paas
Fred Paas Erasmus University Rotterdam
Tamara van Gog
Tamara van Gog Utrecht University
Anique B. H. de Bruin
Anique B. H. de Bruin Maastricht University
Henny P. A. Boshuizen
Henny P. A. Boshuizen The Open University
Axel P. N. Themmen
Axel P. N. Themmen Erasmus University Rotterdam
K. Anders Ericsson
K. Anders Ericsson Florida State University
Chris Visscher
Chris Visscher University Medical Center Groningen
Peter A. Hancock
Peter A. Hancock University of Central Florida
Paul Ayres
Paul Ayres University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology degree is an important step toward a rewarding career in mental health, research, or counseling. With a vast array of programs available across the country, finding the best fit can be a challenge. For those exploring options on a broader scale, the top psychology degrees in USA provide a useful starting point, highlighting leading institutions and their specialized offerings.

For students targeting specific regions, state and city rankings help identify programs tailored to local career needs and interests. Those interested in pursuing psychology in Virginia can explore the best psychology program rankings in Virginia, while individuals seeking programs on the coast may look into the top psychology degrees in Virginia Beach. Similarly, aspiring psychologists considering Texas can review the best psychology program rankings in Waco for regional insights.

Many online degrees now provide flexible study options, making it easier to balance education with work or family commitments. Whether seeking entry-level roles or advanced careers in clinical practice, research, or organizational psychology, a well-chosen degree greatly enhances your career pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Remy M. J. P. Rikers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles