World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6804 6338 403 393 96 15160

Paul Ayres publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul Ayres between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul Ayres published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2011. 4 of the 104 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2011. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1990 2025

104 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul Ayres: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 1
2001 3
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 5
2006 4
2007 5
2008 3
2009 7
2010 2
2011 20
2012 4
2013 2
2014 5
2015 5
2016 2
2017 6
2018 3
2019 10
2020 2
2021 2
2022 3
2023 1
2024 3
2025 1
Total 104
Download as CSV

Paul Ayres publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Ayres sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 96 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 96
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul Ayres D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Ayres sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul Ayres is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia and specializes in psychology, with a strong focus on experimental and cognitive psychology as well as developmental and educational psychology. Their body of work includes contributions to social psychology, artificial intelligence, and automotive engineering, reflecting a broad interdisciplinary approach within the field.

The research topics covered by Ayres concentrate on visual and cognitive learning processes, innovative teaching and learning methods, and hearing impairment and communication. Additional areas of focus include learning styles and cognitive differences, intelligent tutoring systems and adaptive learning, spatial cognition and navigation, and healthcare technology and patient monitoring.

Ayres has published extensively in several academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Educational Psychology Review
  • Education Sciences
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Computers in Human Behavior
  • British Journal of Educational Psychology

Key recent papers by Ayres are:

  • The Validity of Physiological Measures to Identify Differences in Intrinsic Cognitive Load, 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Something old, something new from cognitive load theory, 2020, Computers in Human Behavior

Additionally, Ayres has collaborated on influential works with other authors, such as Akbar Bahari and Juan C. Castro-Alonso. Some of these collaborations have appeared in the Educational Psychology Review and the British Journal of Educational Psychology, covering topics like embodied cognition in learning and the role of hand perspective in learning from procedural animations.

Frequent co-authors in Ayres's publications include:

  • Nadine Marcus
  • Fred Paas
  • Björn B. de Koning
  • John Sweller
  • Joy Yeonjoo Lee

This network of co-authorship highlights a collaborative research environment spanning multiple facets of cognitive and educational psychology.

Best Publications

  • Cognitive Load Theory

    John Sweller;Paul Ayres;Slava Kalyuga

  • The Expertise Reversal Effect

    Slava Kalyuga;Paul Ayres;Paul Chandler;John Sweller

  • The Split-Attention Principle in Multimedia Learning

    Paul Ayres;John Sweller

  • Research on Cognitive Load Theory and Its Design Implications for E-Learning.

    Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer;Paul Ayres

  • Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems

    Paul Ayres

  • The Impact of Sequencing and Prior Knowledge on Learning Mathematics Through Spreadsheet Applications

    Tracey Clarke;Paul Ayres;John Sweller

  • The Mirror Neuron System and Observational Learning: Implications for the Effectiveness of Dynamic Visualizations

    Tamara van Gog;Fred Paas;Fred Paas;Nadine Marcus;Paul Ayres

  • Impact of Reducing Intrinsic Cognitive Load on Learning in a Mathematical Domain.

    Paul Ayres

  • Cognitive Load Theory for the Design of Medical Simulations.

    Kristin L. Fraser;Paul Ayres;John Sweller

  • Making instructional animations more effective: a cognitive load approach

    Paul Ayres;Fred Paas;Fred Paas

  • Learning hand manipulative tasks: When instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations

    Paul Ayres;Nadine Marcus;Christopher Chan;Nixon Qian

  • Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills

    Anna Wong;Nadine Marcus;Paul Ayres;Lee Smith

  • Cognitive Load Theory: A Broader View on the Role of Memory in Learning and Education

    Fred Paas;Fred Paas;Paul L Ayres

  • Cognitive load theory: New directions and challenges

    Paul Ayres;Fred Paas;Fred Paas

  • Contemporary cognitive load theory research: The good, the bad and the ugly

    Paul A. Kirschner;Paul Ayres;Paul Chandler

  • The Validity of Physiological Measures to Identify Differences in Intrinsic Cognitive Load.

    Paul Ayres;Joy Yeonjoo Lee;Fred Paas;Fred Paas;Jeroen J G van Merriënboer

  • Can the cognitive load approach make instructional animations more effective

    Paul Ayres;Fred Paas;Fred Paas

  • Systematic Mathematical Errors and Cognitive Load.

    Paul L. Ayres

  • Why Goal-Free Problems Can Facilitate Learning

    Paul L. Ayres

  • Effective teaching in the context of a grade 12 high-stakes external examination in New South Wales, Australia

    Paul Ayres;Wayne Sawyer;Steve Dinham

  • Worked example effects in individual and group work settings

    Endah Retnowati;Paul Ayres;John Sweller

Frequent Co-Authors

Fred Paas
Fred Paas Erasmus University Rotterdam
John Sweller
John Sweller University of New South Wales
Slava Kalyuga
Slava Kalyuga University of New South Wales
Tamara van Gog
Tamara van Gog Utrecht University
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer
Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer Maastricht University
Paul Chandler
Paul Chandler University of Wollongong
Peter A. Hancock
Peter A. Hancock University of Central Florida
Richard E. Mayer
Richard E. Mayer University of California, Santa Barbara
Paul A. Kirschner
Paul A. Kirschner Open University in the Netherlands
Remy M. J. P. Rikers
Remy M. J. P. Rikers Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens diverse career opportunities, including specialized fields like Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). Many students interested in ABA pursue online degrees that offer flexibility for balancing studies with work or other commitments. As a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), you can impact lives by supporting individuals with behavioral challenges, especially those with autism spectrum disorder.

It’s important to understand that Nashville bcba requirements may differ from those in other cities. Education, supervised fieldwork, and passing the BCBA exam are common steps, but some regions have distinct regulations or licensing standards. For example, New Orleans bcba requirements also emphasize accredited degree programs and practical experience.

Large metropolitan areas may require additional components, as seen with New York City bcba education requirements. Similarly, understanding state-based licensing is crucial—an example being Newark bcba requirements. Thoroughly research the requirements in your area to choose the best online degree and career path that align with your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Ayres

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles