World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
21818
World Ranking
8682
National Ranking
512

Paul Chandler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Chandler sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 66 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paul Chandler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Chandler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Chandler is affiliated with the University of Wollongong in Australia. Their research spans several fields within medicine and psychology, with a primary focus on developmental, clinical, and biomedical aspects.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Medicine
  • Psychology

Within these domains, their subfields of study cover:

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Oncology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Clinical Psychology

Key topics addressed in their research are:

  • Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Child Abuse and Trauma

Paul Chandler has published several papers in various academic venues, including:

  • Effects of An Acute Physical Activity Break on Test Anxiety and Math Test Performance, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • 'Jump start' childcare-based intervention to promote physical activity in pre-schoolers: six-month findings from a cluster randomised trial, 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Fluorescence-guided surgery of the esophagus, 2021, Annals of Translational Medicine
  • The use of tissue oxygen measurements compared to indocyanine green imaging for the assessment of intraoperative tissue viability of human bowel, 2021, Surgical Endoscopy
  • Tissue Oximetry as a Potential Alternative to Indocyanine Green (ICG) Perfusion Assessment in Colorectal Anastomotic Cases, 2023, Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques

Frequent coauthors in their work include:

  • Fred Paas
  • Anthony D. Okely
  • Rebecca M. Stanley
  • Danny A. Sherwinter
  • Rachel A. Jones

They have contributed to multiple publications in key journals such as:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Annals of Translational Medicine
  • Surgical Endoscopy

Best Publications

  • Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction

    Paul Chandler;John Sweller

  • The Expertise Reversal Effect

    Slava Kalyuga;Paul Ayres;Paul Chandler;John Sweller

  • Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn

    John Sweller;Paul A Chandler

  • Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction

    Slava Kalyuga;Paul Chandler;John Sweller

  • When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages?

    Richard E. Mayer;Paul Chandler

  • THE SPLIT-ATTENTION EFFECT AS A FACTOR IN THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTION

    Paul Chandler;John Sweller

  • Assimilating complex information

    Edwina Pollock;Paul A Chandler;John Sweller

  • When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples.

    Slava Kalyuga;Paul Chandler;Juhani Tuovinen;John Sweller

  • When two sensory modes are better than one

    Sharon Tindall-Ford;Paul Chandler;John Sweller

  • Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material.

    John Sweller;Paul Chandler;Paul Tierney;Martin Cooper

  • Levels of Expertise and Instructional Design

    Slava Kalyuga;Paul Chandler;John Sweller

  • Incorporating Learner Experience into the Design of Multimedia Instruction.

    Slava Kalyuga;Paul Chandler;John Sweller

  • Evidence for Cognitive Load Theory

    John Sweller;Paul Chandler

  • Cognitive Load While Learning to Use a Computer Program

    Paul Chandler;John Sweller

  • The Role of Visual Indicators in Dual Sensory Mode Instruction

    Hyun‐Ju Jeung;Paul Chandler;John Sweller

  • When redundant on-screen text in multimedia technical instruction can interfere with learning.

    Slava Kalyuga;Paul Chandler;John Sweller

  • Learner Experience and Efficiency of Instructional Guidance

    Slava Kalyuga;Paul Chandler;John Sweller

  • Learning by imagining.

    Graham Cooper;Sharon Tindall-Ford;Paul Chandler;John Sweller

  • Effects of Integrated Physical Exercises and Gestures on Preschool Children’s Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning

    Myrto-Foteini Mavilidi;Myrto-Foteini Mavilidi;Anthony D Okely;Paul A Chandler;Dylan P Cliff

  • When auditory presentations should and should not be a component of multimedia instruction

    Wayne Leahy;Paul Chandler;John Sweller

Frequent Co-Authors

John Sweller
John Sweller University of New South Wales
Fred Paas
Fred Paas Erasmus University Rotterdam
Slava Kalyuga
Slava Kalyuga University of New South Wales
Anthony D. Okely
Anthony D. Okely University of Wollongong
Beryl Hesketh
Beryl Hesketh Western Sydney University
Stewart G. Trost
Stewart G. Trost University of Queensland
Jo Salmon
Jo Salmon Deakin University
John J. Reilly
John J. Reilly University of Strathclyde
Sally Andrews
Sally Andrews University of Sydney
Paul Ayres
Paul Ayres University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology studies in the USA opens doors to varied online degrees and professional pathways, particularly in counseling and mental health services. Many universities now offer accelerated programs that allow students to earn credentials faster, meeting the growing demand for qualified counselors.

One key consideration is state-specific licensure requirements. For example, those interested in becoming a counselor in Pennsylvania can look into Pennsylvania accelerated counseling programs, which streamline the path toward licensure. Similarly, Rhode Island accelerated counseling programs are tailored to help students meet local certification and employment needs efficiently.

Potential counselors in the Southeast may be interested in the fastest way to become a counselor in South Carolina, where various online and hybrid learning options are available. In the Midwest, students can explore the fastest way to become a counselor in South Dakota to find flexible and affordable routes into the field.

By understanding these options, students can choose online degree paths that best fit their goals and accelerate their journey into a rewarding psychology-based career.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Chandler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles