World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 66 961 836 450 381 248 20495

Christine Grady publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christine Grady between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christine Grady published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2018. 12 of the 297 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2018. 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 5 publications
1988 2025

297 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christine Grady: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 3
1989 3
1990 1
1991 2
1992 0
1993 1
1994 2
1995 4
1996 4
1997 0
1998 3
1999 2
2000 1
2001 5
2002 10
2003 2
2004 16
2005 11
2006 9
2007 10
2008 17
2009 11
2010 9
2011 7
2012 14
2013 8
2014 7
2015 12
2016 17
2017 12
2018 20
2019 13
2020 12
2021 12
2022 13
2023 12
2024 7
2025 5
Total 297
Download as CSV

Christine Grady publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine Grady sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 244–253 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 248 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167 248
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Christine Grady D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christine Grady sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68 66
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Christine Grady is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States, with a research portfolio primarily centered on medicine and health professions. Their work addresses various ethical issues in clinical and biomedical contexts, with a particular focus on public health, environmental and occupational health, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Their scholarly output prominently involves topics such as ethics in medical practice, ethics in clinical research, ethics and legal issues in pediatric healthcare, biomedical ethics and regulation, patient dignity and privacy, palliative care and end-of-life issues, and prenatal screening and diagnostics.

Among recent publications, Christine Grady has contributed to discussions surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and related ethical challenges. Notable papers include:

  • "Covid-19: Ethical Challenges for Nurses" (2020, The Hastings Center Report)
  • "Nurses confronting the coronavirus: Challenges met and lessons learned to date" (2020, Nursing Outlook)
  • "COVID-19 vaccine trial ethics once we have efficacious vaccines" (2020, Science)
  • "Patient and Family Descriptions of Ethical Concerns" (2020, The American Journal of Bioethics)
  • "Experiences of Patients After Withdrawal From Cancer Clinical Trials" (2021, JAMA Network Open)

Christine Grady frequently publishes in several venues known for ethical and biomedical discourse, including:

  • The American Journal of Bioethics
  • AJOB Empirical Bioethics
  • Neurology
  • The Hastings Center Report
  • JAMA Network Open

The researcher collaborates regularly with colleagues such as Connie M. Ulrich, Saskia Hendriks, David Wendler, Marion Danis, and Annette Rid. These collaborations reflect a sustained engagement in bioethical inquiry and clinical research oversight.

Best Publications

  • What Makes Clinical Research Ethical

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;David Wendler;Christine Grady

  • What Makes Clinical Research in Developing Countries Ethical? The Benchmarks of Ethical Research

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;David Wendler;Jack Killen;Christine Grady

  • Ethical climate, ethics stress, and the job satisfaction of nurses and social workers in the United States.

    Connie Ulrich;Patricia O'Donnell;Carol Taylor;Adrienne Farrar

  • Enduring and Emerging Challenges of Informed Consent

    Christine Grady

  • What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation.

    Neal Dickert;Christine Grady

  • The Limitations of “Vulnerability” as a Protection for Human Research Participants

    Carol Levine;Ruth Faden;Christine Grady;Dale E Hammerschmidt

  • Clinical Trials and Medical Care: Defining the Therapeutic Misconception

    Gail E Henderson;Larry R Churchill;Arlene M Davis;Michele M Easter

  • Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002.

    Elizabeth Horstmann;Mary S. McCabe;Louise Grochow;Seiichiro Yamamoto

  • How Much Is Life Worth: Cetuximab, Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, and the $440 Billion Question

    Tito Fojo;Christine Grady

  • Everyday ethics: ethical issues and stress in nursing practice.

    Connie M. Ulrich;Carol Taylor;Karen Soeken;Patricia O’Donnell

  • Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation, and therapeutic optimism.

    Sam Horng;Christine Grady

  • Women's autonomy in health care decision-making in developing countries: a synthesis of the literature.

    Pauline E Osamor;Christine Grady

  • Money for Research Participation: Does It Jeopardize Informed Consent?

    Christine Grady

  • Enrolling Pregnant Women: Issues in Clinical Research

    Mary C. Blehar;Catherine Spong;Christine Grady;Sara F. Goldkind

  • A Systematic Review of the Empirical Literature Evaluating IRBs: What We Know and What We Still Need to Learn:

    Lura Abbott;Christine Grady

  • Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions

    Christine Grady;Lisa Eckstein;Ben Berkman;Dan Brock

  • A Broader Understanding of Moral Distress.

    Stephen M. Campbell;Connie M. Ulrich;Christine Grady

  • Does Ethics Education Influence the Moral Action of Practicing Nurses and Social Workers

    Christine Grady;Marion Danis;Karen L. Soeken;Patricia O'Donnell

  • Covid-19: Ethical Challenges for Nurses.

    Georgina Morley;Christine Grady;Joan McCarthy;Connie M. Ulrich

  • More than the money: a review of the literature examining healthy volunteer motivations

    Leanne Stunkel;Christine Grady

  • Oversight of Human Participants Research: Identifying Problems To Evaluate Reform Proposals

    Ezekiel J. Emanuel;Anne Wood;Alan Fleischman;Angela Bowen

  • SHEA guideline for management of healthcare workers who are infected with hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and/or human immunodeficiency virus.

    David K. Henderson;Louise Dembry;Neil O. Fishman;Christine Grady

Frequent Co-Authors

Ezekiel J. Emanuel
Ezekiel J. Emanuel University of Pennsylvania
David Wendler
David Wendler National Institutes of Health
Marion Danis
Marion Danis National Institutes of Health
Benjamin S. Wilfond
Benjamin S. Wilfond University of Washington
Henry T. Greely
Henry T. Greely Stanford University
Karen L. Soeken
Karen L. Soeken University of Maryland, Baltimore
Scott Y. H. Kim
Scott Y. H. Kim National Institutes of Health
Lori Wiener
Lori Wiener National Institutes of Health
Ruth R. Faden
Ruth R. Faden Johns Hopkins University
Leslie G. Biesecker
Leslie G. Biesecker National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide range of rewarding online degree options. With advances in distance learning, earning a specialized qualification is now more accessible than ever, especially for those seeking flexibility or affordability.

If you're interested in human behavior, a psychology degree online offers a cost-effective route to understanding mental processes and building a foundation for diverse roles in counseling, research, and human resources.

For students passionate about community impact, the easiest msw online program can lead to careers in social work, allowing you to support individuals and families across various settings with relatively accessible entry requirements.

Aspiring psychologists aiming for advanced clinical roles can consider the shortest online psyd programs, which focus on hands-on training, or the mft online programs designed for those interested in marriage and family therapy.

These online pathways combine academic rigor with convenience, preparing graduates for meaningful roles across mental health, social services, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Christine Grady

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles