World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
60
Citations
14988
World Ranking
1455
National Ranking
694

Marion Danis publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marion Danis sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 208 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Marion Danis D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marion Danis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marion Danis is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research spans over multiple aspects of health professions and medicine, with significant contributions in ethics and health systems.

The primary fields of study for Danis include:

  • Health Professions
  • Medicine

The main subfields explored are:

  • General Health Professions
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Emergency Medical Services

The major topics of their work cover a diverse range of issues such as:

  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Patient Dignity and Privacy
  • Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Disaster Response and Management
  • Ethics in Clinical Research

Danis has a notable record of published research, including papers such as:

  • "Ethics Consultation in U.S. Hospitals: A National Follow-Up Study" (2021) published in The American Journal of Bioethics
  • "Patient and Family Descriptions of Ethical Concerns" (2020) published in The American Journal of Bioethics
  • "Ethics Consultation in U.S. Hospitals: Opinions of Ethics Practitioners" (2021) published in The American Journal of Bioethics
  • "Covid-19 Vaccine Trials and Incarcerated People - The Ethics of Inclusion" (2020) published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Health care ethics programs in U.S. Hospitals: results from a National Survey" (2021) published in BMC Medical Ethics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Danis include:

  • Susan Dorr Goold
  • Lydia Kapiriri
  • Claudia Marcela Vélez
  • Beverley M. Essue
  • Élysée Nouvet

Danis' work appears predominantly in several publication venues with multiple papers, such as:

  • The American Journal of Bioethics
  • UNC Libraries
  • Health Policy
  • Abstracts
  • AJOB Empirical Bioethics

Best Publications

  • A prospective study of advance directives for life-sustaining care.

    M Danis;L I Southerland;J M Garrett;J L Smith

  • Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: The Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

    Robert D. Truog;Alexandra F. M. Cist;Sharon E. Brackett;Jeffrey P. Burns

  • What is wrong with end-of-life care? Opinions of bereaved family members.

    Laura C. Hanson;Marion Danis;Joanne Garrett

  • Ethical climate, ethics stress, and the job satisfaction of nurses and social workers in the United States.

    Connie Ulrich;Patricia O'Donnell;Carol Taylor;Adrienne Farrar

  • Quality indicators for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit.

    Ellen B. Clarke;J. Randall Curtis;John M. Luce;Mitchell Levy

  • Shared Decision Making in ICUs: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.

    Alexander A. Kon;Judy E. Davidson;Wynne Morrison;Marion Danis

  • Everyday ethics: ethical issues and stress in nursing practice.

    Connie M. Ulrich;Carol Taylor;Karen Soeken;Patricia O’Donnell

  • Life-sustaining treatments during terminal illness: who wants what?

    Joanne Mills Garrett;Russell P. Harris;Jean K. Norburn;Donald L. Patrick

  • Patients?? and Families?? Preferences for Medical Intensive Care

    M. Danis;D. L. Patrick;L. I. Southerland;M. L. Green

  • Effect of Palliative Care–Led Meetings for Families of Patients With Chronic Critical Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Shannon S. Carson;Christopher E. Cox;Sylvan Wallenstein;Laura C. Hanson

  • Quality of life following intensive care.

    Donald L. Patrick;Marion Danis;Leslie I. Southerland;Guiyoung Hong

  • Stability of Choices about Life-Sustaining Treatments

    Marion Danis;Joanne Garrett;Russell Harris;Donald L. Patrick

  • Association between Critical Care Physician Management and Patient Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit

    Mitchell M. Levy;John Rapoport;Stanley Lemeshow;Donald B. Chalfin

  • Differences in end-of-life decision making among black and white ambulatory cancer patients

    Elizabeth D. McKinley;Joanne M. Garrett;Arthur T. Evans;Marion Danis

  • End-of-life care for the critically ill: A national intensive care unit survey.

    Judith E. Nelson;Derek C. Angus;Lisa A. Weissfeld;Kathleen A. Puntillo

  • Views of US Physicians About Controlling Health Care Costs

    Jon C. Tilburt;Matthew K. Wynia;Matthew K. Wynia;Robert D. Sheeler;Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir

  • A national survey of U.S. internists’ experiences with ethical dilemmas and ethics consultation

    Gordon DuVal;Brian Clarridge;Gary Gensler;Marion Danis

  • Can Clinical Interventions Change Care at the End of Life

    Laura C. Hanson;James A. Tulsky;Marion Danis

  • Does Ethics Education Influence the Moral Action of Practicing Nurses and Social Workers

    Christine Grady;Marion Danis;Karen L. Soeken;Patricia O'Donnell

  • Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: experiences of European doctors

    Samia Hurst;Arnaud Perrier;Renzo Pegoraro;Stella Reiter-Theil

  • Consensus Statement on the Triage of Critically III Patients

    Charles L. Sprung;Marion Danis;Mary Ann Baily;Donald B. Chalfin

Frequent Co-Authors

Christine Grady
Christine Grady National Institutes of Health
Susan Dorr Goold
Susan Dorr Goold University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James A. Tulsky
James A. Tulsky Harvard University
Mitchell M. Levy
Mitchell M. Levy Brown University
Benjamin S. Wilfond
Benjamin S. Wilfond University of Washington
David Wendler
David Wendler National Institutes of Health
Arnaud Perrier
Arnaud Perrier Geneva College
Matthew K. Wynia
Matthew K. Wynia University of Colorado Denver
Karen L. Soeken
Karen L. Soeken University of Maryland, Baltimore
Mildred K. Cho
Mildred K. Cho Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a variety of dynamic online degree options. Many students opt for the flexibility of msw programs that balance affordability and rigorous coursework, preparing graduates for impactful roles in social work.

For individuals interested in behavioral analysis, bcba master's programs online provide a pathway to specialized careers in schools, hospitals, and private practice. These programs are designed to help students gain practical skills and meet certification requirements efficiently.

If you’re seeking a quicker path to a graduate degree, a 1 year online master's in social work can fast-track your journey into advanced social service roles without sacrificing quality. Likewise, earning a quickest psychology degree online can lead to fulfilling careers in counseling, research, or organizational development.

Each option offers unique advantages, such as accelerated timelines, affordability, and online flexibility—making it easier to align your education with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Marion Danis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles