What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Statistics
- Artificial intelligence
- Mathematics education
His main research concerns Multimedia, Cognitive psychology, Cognitive load, Test and Visualization.
His Multimedia research includes elements of Working memory, Teaching method and Information processing.
His Information processing study combines topics in areas such as Visual learning, Verbal learning, Learning environment, Cognitive science and Cognitive style.
His work investigates the relationship between Visual learning and topics such as Reading comprehension that intersect with problems in Mathematics education.
His work carried out in the field of Cognitive psychology brings together such families of science as School learning, Foreign language, Moderation, Meta-analysis and Educational technology.
His Cognitive load study combines topics in areas such as Task, Multimedia instruction and Reading.
His most cited work include:
- Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis (582 citations)
- Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. (582 citations)
- SUPPORTING VISUAL AND VERBAL LEARNING PREFERENCES IN A SECOND LANGUAGE MULTIMEDIA LEARNING ENVIRONMENT (398 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Detlev Leutner focuses on Cognitive psychology, Political science, Mathematics education, Multimedia and Pedagogy.
His studies deal with areas such as Spatial ability, Comprehension, Cognitive load, Learning environment and Cognitive style as well as Cognitive psychology.
His study in Cognitive load is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Working memory, Task and Educational psychology.
His Cognitive style research includes themes of Verbal learning, Cognitive science and Visual learning.
His study explores the link between Mathematics education and topics such as Test that cross with problems in Teacher education.
His Multimedia study incorporates themes from Educational technology, Foreign language and Information processing.
He most often published in these fields:
- Cognitive psychology (18.94%)
- Political science (14.39%)
- Mathematics education (13.64%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Self-regulated learning (9.09%)
- Pedagogy (12.12%)
- Competence (9.09%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Detlev Leutner spends much of his time researching Self-regulated learning, Pedagogy, Competence, Cognitive psychology and Mathematics education.
The Self-regulated learning study combines topics in areas such as Cognitive load, Metacognition and Resource management.
In general Pedagogy study, his work on Professional knowledge and Educational science often relates to the realm of Student dropout and Learning behavior, thereby connecting several areas of interest.
His work on Competence assessment as part of his general Competence study is frequently connected to Research areas, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.
His research combines Cognitive style and Cognitive psychology.
The concepts of his Mathematics education study are interwoven with issues in Test, Learning achievement and Achievement test.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- A longitudinal study of teachers' occupational well-being: Applying the job demands-resources model. (58 citations)
- Visualizers versus verbalizers (58 citations)
- Teachers’ assessment competence: Integrating knowledge-, process-, and product-oriented approaches into a competence-oriented conceptual model (52 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Statistics
- Artificial intelligence
- Mathematics education
His primary areas of study are Cognitive style, Eye tracking, Gaze, Cognitive psychology and Humanities.
Detlev Leutner has researched Cognitive style in several fields, including Comprehension, Spatial imagery, Cognitive science, Comprehension test and Object.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
