World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 54 2095 1902 60 50 190 19510

Tina Seidel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tina Seidel between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tina Seidel published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2020. 22 of the 241 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2020. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 11 publications
2002 2025

241 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tina Seidel: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 1
2005 4
2006 3
2007 4
2008 2
2009 4
2010 4
2011 8
2012 13
2013 11
2014 11
2015 18
2016 9
2017 14
2018 14
2019 10
2020 24
2021 18
2022 24
2023 21
2024 11
2025 11
Total 241
Download as CSV

Tina Seidel publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tina Seidel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 184–193 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 190 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319 190
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Tina Seidel D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tina Seidel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131 54
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Review of Research Award, American Educational Research Association

Overview

Tina Seidel is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with a significant emphasis on Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology. Specific subfields also addressed include Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Social Psychology.

The main topics covered in Tina Seidel's work encompass various aspects of educational research and practice. These include:

  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Educational Games and Gamification
  • Education Methods and Technologies
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Sociology and Education Studies

Tina Seidel has contributed research to several academic venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Frontiers in Education
  • Teaching and Teacher Education
  • Learning and Instruction
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Learning and Individual Differences

Co-authorship is a notable part of their academic activity. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Doris Holzberger
  • Ricardo Böheim
  • Frank Fischer
  • Daniel Sommerhoff
  • Stefan Ufer

Recent significant papers authored by or co-authored with Tina Seidel are:

  • "ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education", 2023, Learning and Individual Differences
  • "Simulation-Based Learning in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis", 2020, Review of Educational Research
  • "All better than being disengaged: Student engagement patterns and their relations to academic self-concept and achievement", 2020, European Journal of Psychology of Education
  • "Towards Human-Centered Explainable AI: A Survey of User Studies for Model Explanations", 2023, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • "Evidence-Based Practice in Higher Education: Teacher Educators' Attitudes, Challenges, and Uses", 2020, Frontiers in Education

Tina Seidel has also contributed books published by:

  • Waxmann Verlag GmbH eBooks, including "Bildung und Resilienz. Gutachten" (2022) and "Bildung und berufliche Souveränität. Gutachten" (2023)
  • Fagbokforlaget eBooks, including "NAFOL Yearbook 2012" (2022) and "Norsk og internasjonal lærerutdanningsforskning" (2022)

Their work has been recognized with the Review of Research Award from the American Educational Research Association in 2008.

Best Publications

  • Teaching Effectiveness Research in the Past Decade: The Role of Theory and Research Design in Disentangling Meta-Analysis Results

    Tina Seidel;Richard J. Shavelson

  • Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching A Meta-Analysis

    Erin Marie Furtak;Tina Seidel;Heidi Iverson;Derek C. Briggs

  • Simulation-Based Learning in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis:

    Olga Chernikova;Nicole Heitzmann;Matthias Stadler;Doris Holzberger

  • Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others?

    Tina Seidel;Kathleen Stürmer;Geraldine Blomberg;Mareike Kobarg

  • Modeling and Measuring the Structure of Professional Vision in Preservice Teachers

    Tina Seidel;Kathleen Stürmer

  • Five research-based heuristics for using video in pre-service teacher education

    Geraldine Blomberg;Alexander Renkl;Miriam Gamoran Sherin;Hilda Borko

  • Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers' practice and students' motivation to learn mathematics and science

    Katharina Kiemer;Alexander Gröschner;Ann-Kathrin Pehmer;Tina Seidel

  • Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education

    Tina Seidel;Geraldine Blomberg;Alexander Renkl

  • Understanding video as a tool for teacher education: investigating instructional strategies to promote reflection

    Geraldine Blomberg;Miriam Gamoran Sherin;Alexander Renkl;Inga Glogger

  • Declarative knowledge and professional vision in teacher education: Effect of courses in teaching and learning

    Kathleen Stürmer;Karen D. Könings;Tina Seidel

  • How Pre-Service Teachers Observe Teaching on Video: Effects of Viewers' Teaching Subjects and the Subject of the Video

    Geraldine Blomberg;Kathleen Stürmer;Tina Seidel

  • Clarity and coherence of lesson goals as a scaffold for student learning

    Tina Seidel;Rolf Rimmele;Manfred Prenzel

  • The Power of Video Studies in Investigating Teaching andLearning in the Classroom

    Tomáš Janík;Tina Seidel;Peter Bowman;Geraldine Blomberg

  • Participatory design of learning environments: integrating perspectives of students, teachers, and designers

    Karen D. Könings;Tina Seidel;Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer

  • Stability of teaching patterns in physics instruction: Findings from a video study

    Tina Seidel;Manfred Prenzel

  • How to run a video study : technical report of the IPN video study

    Tina Seidel;Manfred Prenzel;Mareike Kobarg

  • Blicke auf den Physikunterricht. Ergebnisse der IPN Videostudie

    Tina Seidel;Manfred Prenzel;Rolf Rimmele;Inger Marie Dalehefte

  • „Observer“ – Validierung eines videobasierten Instruments zur Erfassung der professionellen Wahrnehmung von Unterricht. Projekt OBSERVE

    Tina Seidel;Geraldine Blomberg;Kathleen Stürmer

  • Wie Lehrpersonen Unterricht wahrnehmen und einschätzen — Erfassung pädagogisch-psychologischer Kompetenzen mit Videosequenzen

    Tina Seidel;Manfred Prenzel

  • The role of student characteristics in studying micro teaching–learning environments

    Tina Seidel

Frequent Co-Authors

Manfred Prenzel
Manfred Prenzel Technical University of Munich
Mareike Kunter
Mareike Kunter Goethe University Frankfurt
Olaf Köller
Olaf Köller Leibniz Association
Frank Fischer
Frank Fischer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Nele McElvany
Nele McElvany TU Dortmund University
Detlev Leutner
Detlev Leutner University of Duisburg-Essen
Hans-Peter Blossfeld
Hans-Peter Blossfeld University of Bamberg
Alexander Renkl
Alexander Renkl University of Freiburg
Martin R. Fischer
Martin R. Fischer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse and rewarding career opportunities. Many students seek flexible programs to balance studies with work or family commitments. For those aiming to make an impact in social work, the accelerated msw online programs offer a fast track to advanced roles in community services, healthcare, and policy development.

If your interests lie in understanding human behavior, psychology is a popular option. Earning an accelerated bachelor's degree in psychology can open pathways to mental health services, education, or organizational consulting.

Those interested in counseling should look for cacrep accredited programs, as these are recognized for meeting rigorous academic and ethical standards—essential for licensure and employment in the field.

For students passionate about supporting families and relationships, pursuing an mft degree online can lead to specialized practice as a marriage and family therapist.

Each of these online pathways offers students the ability to advance their education and careers in a flexible environment, with options suited to a variety of social impact roles.

Best Scientists Citing Tina Seidel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles