World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
54
Citations
19510
World Ranking
2095
National Ranking
60

Tina Seidel publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tina Seidel sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 190 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Tina Seidel D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tina Seidel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Review of Research Award, American Educational Research Association

Overview

Tina Seidel is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with a significant emphasis on Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology. Specific subfields also addressed include Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Social Psychology.

The main topics covered in Tina Seidel's work encompass various aspects of educational research and practice. These include:

  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Educational Games and Gamification
  • Education Methods and Technologies
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Sociology and Education Studies

Tina Seidel has contributed research to several academic venues, with frequent publications in:

  • Frontiers in Education
  • Teaching and Teacher Education
  • Learning and Instruction
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Learning and Individual Differences

Co-authorship is a notable part of their academic activity. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Doris Holzberger
  • Ricardo Böheim
  • Frank Fischer
  • Daniel Sommerhoff
  • Stefan Ufer

Recent significant papers authored by or co-authored with Tina Seidel are:

  • "ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education", 2023, Learning and Individual Differences
  • "Simulation-Based Learning in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis", 2020, Review of Educational Research
  • "All better than being disengaged: Student engagement patterns and their relations to academic self-concept and achievement", 2020, European Journal of Psychology of Education
  • "Towards Human-Centered Explainable AI: A Survey of User Studies for Model Explanations", 2023, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • "Evidence-Based Practice in Higher Education: Teacher Educators' Attitudes, Challenges, and Uses", 2020, Frontiers in Education

Tina Seidel has also contributed books published by:

  • Waxmann Verlag GmbH eBooks, including "Bildung und Resilienz. Gutachten" (2022) and "Bildung und berufliche Souveränität. Gutachten" (2023)
  • Fagbokforlaget eBooks, including "NAFOL Yearbook 2012" (2022) and "Norsk og internasjonal lærerutdanningsforskning" (2022)

Their work has been recognized with the Review of Research Award from the American Educational Research Association in 2008.

Best Publications

  • Teaching Effectiveness Research in the Past Decade: The Role of Theory and Research Design in Disentangling Meta-Analysis Results

    Tina Seidel;Richard J. Shavelson

  • Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching A Meta-Analysis

    Erin Marie Furtak;Tina Seidel;Heidi Iverson;Derek C. Briggs

  • Simulation-Based Learning in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis:

    Olga Chernikova;Nicole Heitzmann;Matthias Stadler;Doris Holzberger

  • Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others?

    Tina Seidel;Kathleen Stürmer;Geraldine Blomberg;Mareike Kobarg

  • Modeling and Measuring the Structure of Professional Vision in Preservice Teachers

    Tina Seidel;Kathleen Stürmer

  • Five research-based heuristics for using video in pre-service teacher education

    Geraldine Blomberg;Alexander Renkl;Miriam Gamoran Sherin;Hilda Borko

  • Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers' practice and students' motivation to learn mathematics and science

    Katharina Kiemer;Alexander Gröschner;Ann-Kathrin Pehmer;Tina Seidel

  • Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education

    Tina Seidel;Geraldine Blomberg;Alexander Renkl

  • Understanding video as a tool for teacher education: investigating instructional strategies to promote reflection

    Geraldine Blomberg;Miriam Gamoran Sherin;Alexander Renkl;Inga Glogger

  • Declarative knowledge and professional vision in teacher education: Effect of courses in teaching and learning

    Kathleen Stürmer;Karen D. Könings;Tina Seidel

  • How Pre-Service Teachers Observe Teaching on Video: Effects of Viewers' Teaching Subjects and the Subject of the Video

    Geraldine Blomberg;Kathleen Stürmer;Tina Seidel

  • Clarity and coherence of lesson goals as a scaffold for student learning

    Tina Seidel;Rolf Rimmele;Manfred Prenzel

  • The Power of Video Studies in Investigating Teaching andLearning in the Classroom

    Tomáš Janík;Tina Seidel;Peter Bowman;Geraldine Blomberg

  • Participatory design of learning environments: integrating perspectives of students, teachers, and designers

    Karen D. Könings;Tina Seidel;Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer

  • Stability of teaching patterns in physics instruction: Findings from a video study

    Tina Seidel;Manfred Prenzel

  • How to run a video study : technical report of the IPN video study

    Tina Seidel;Manfred Prenzel;Mareike Kobarg

  • Blicke auf den Physikunterricht. Ergebnisse der IPN Videostudie

    Tina Seidel;Manfred Prenzel;Rolf Rimmele;Inger Marie Dalehefte

  • „Observer“ – Validierung eines videobasierten Instruments zur Erfassung der professionellen Wahrnehmung von Unterricht. Projekt OBSERVE

    Tina Seidel;Geraldine Blomberg;Kathleen Stürmer

  • All better than being disengaged: Student engagement patterns and their relations to academic self-concept and achievement

    Katharina Schnitzler;Doris Holzberger;Tina Seidel

  • Wie Lehrpersonen Unterricht wahrnehmen und einschätzen — Erfassung pädagogisch-psychologischer Kompetenzen mit Videosequenzen

    Tina Seidel;Manfred Prenzel

  • The role of student characteristics in studying micro teaching–learning environments

    Tina Seidel

Frequent Co-Authors

Manfred Prenzel
Manfred Prenzel Technical University of Munich
Mareike Kunter
Mareike Kunter Goethe University Frankfurt
Olaf Köller
Olaf Köller Leibniz Association
Frank Fischer
Frank Fischer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Nele McElvany
Nele McElvany TU Dortmund University
Detlev Leutner
Detlev Leutner University of Duisburg-Essen
Hans-Peter Blossfeld
Hans-Peter Blossfeld University of Bamberg
Alexander Renkl
Alexander Renkl University of Freiburg
Martin R. Fischer
Martin R. Fischer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse and rewarding career opportunities. Many students seek flexible programs to balance studies with work or family commitments. For those aiming to make an impact in social work, the accelerated msw online programs offer a fast track to advanced roles in community services, healthcare, and policy development.

If your interests lie in understanding human behavior, psychology is a popular option. Earning an accelerated bachelor's degree in psychology can open pathways to mental health services, education, or organizational consulting.

Those interested in counseling should look for cacrep accredited programs, as these are recognized for meeting rigorous academic and ethical standards—essential for licensure and employment in the field.

For students passionate about supporting families and relationships, pursuing an mft degree online can lead to specialized practice as a marriage and family therapist.

Each of these online pathways offers students the ability to advance their education and careers in a flexible environment, with options suited to a variety of social impact roles.

Best Scientists Citing Tina Seidel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles