World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 43 4337 4005 116 104 385 10131

Martin R. Fischer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin R. Fischer between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin R. Fischer published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 14.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2017. 60 of the 545 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2017. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 6 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 30 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 29 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 37 publications 2017: 40 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 32 publications
1989 2025

545 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin R. Fischer: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 6
1995 0
1996 3
1997 2
1998 2
1999 3
2000 1
2001 2
2002 0
2003 5
2004 3
2005 6
2006 6
2007 9
2008 30
2009 12
2010 21
2011 29
2012 18
2013 27
2014 23
2015 28
2016 37
2017 40
2018 21
2019 33
2020 28
2021 34
2022 27
2023 26
2024 28
2025 32
Total 545
Download as CSV

Martin R. Fischer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin R. Fischer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 384–393 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 385 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44 385
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin R. Fischer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin R. Fischer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300 43
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin R. Fischer is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant body of work addressing subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Family Practice, Education, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The major topics covered in Fischer's research include:

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Fischer has contributed to various scientific papers, among which recent notable publications are:

  • Using natural language processing to support peer-feedback in the age of artificial intelligence: A cross-disciplinary framework and a research agenda, 2023, British Journal of Educational Technology
  • Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact, 2020, BMC Medical Education
  • Investigating statistical literacy and scientific reasoning & argumentation in medical-, social sciences-, and economics students, 2021, Learning and Individual Differences
  • Representational scaffolding in digital simulations - learning professional practices in higher education, 2022, Information and Learning Sciences
  • Assessment of Diagnostic Competences With Standardized Patients Versus Virtual Patients: Experimental Study in the Context of History Taking, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research

Frequent co-authors in Fischer's research include:

  • Frank Fischer
  • Ralf Schmidmaier
  • Matthias Stadler
  • Jan Zottmann
  • Markus Berndt

The scientist's work has appeared in a variety of publication venues, notably:

  • PubMed
  • Computer-supported collaborative learning/The "Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference
  • Monatsschrift für Deutsches Recht
  • BMC Medical Education
  • MedEdPublish

Martin R. Fischer has also contributed to book publications, including:

  • Annals of the History and Philosophy of Biology 24/2019, published by Annals of the history and philosophy of biology, 2021
  • Interprofessionelle Bildung für die Gesundheitsversorgung, published by Springer Nature, 2024

Best Publications

  • Empathy decline and its reasons: a systematic review of studies with medical students and residents.

    Melanie Neumann;Friedrich Edelhäuser;Diethard Tauschel;Martin R. Fischer

  • A European Evidence-Based Guideline for the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes

    B. Paulweber;P. Valensi;J. Lindström;N. M. Lalic

  • Take action to prevent diabetes--the IMAGE toolkit for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in Europe.

    J. Lindström;A. Neumann;K. E. Sheppard;A. Gilis-Januszewska

  • Job requirements compared to medical school education: differences between graduates from problem-based learning and conventional curricula

    Christopher L Schlett;Hinnerk Doll;Janosch Dahmen;Ole Polacsek

  • An Introduction to the Inverted/Flipped Classroom Model in Education and Advanced Training in Medicine and in the Healthcare Professions.

    Daniel Tolks;Christine Schäfer;Tobias Raupach;Leona Kruse

  • Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation: Advancing an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda in Education

    Frank Fischer;Ingo Kollar;Stefan Ufer;Beate Sodian

  • The Role for Virtual Patients in the Future of Medical Education

    Norman B. Berman;Steven J. Durning;Martin R. Fischer;Soren Huwendiek

  • Case-Based Learning with Worked Examples in Complex Domains: Two Experimental Studies in Undergraduate Medical Education.

    Robin Stark;Veronika Kopp;Martin R. Fischer

  • Finally finished! National Competence Based Catalogues of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) and Dental Education (NKLZ) ready for trial

    Martin R. Fischer;Daniel Bauer;Karin Mohn;NKLM-Projektgruppe

  • Towards a typology of virtual patients.

    Sören Huwendiek;Bas A. De leng;Nabil Zary;Martin R. Fischer

  • Fostering diagnostic knowledge through computer-supported, case-based worked examples: effects of erroneous examples and feedback.

    Veronika Kopp;Robin Stark;Martin R Fischer

  • Fostering professional communication skills of future physicians and teachers: effects of e-learning with video cases and role-play

    Martin Gartmeier;Johannes Bauer;Martin R. Fischer;Tobias Hoppe-Seyler

  • Experiences with different integration strategies of case-based e-learning

    Inge Hege;Veronica Ropp;Martin Adler;Katja Radon

  • Facilitating Diagnostic Competences in Simulations in Higher Education: A Framework and a Research Agenda

    Nicole Heitzmann;Tina Seidel;Ansgar Opitz;Andreas Hetmanek

  • The use of Facebook in medical education--a literature review.

    Tanja Pander;Severin Pinilla;Konstantinos Dimitriadis;Martin R Fischer

  • Crew resource management training in healthcare: a systematic review of intervention design, training conditions and evaluation.

    Benedict Gross;Leonie Rusin;Jan Kiesewetter;Jan M Zottmann

  • Using electronic flashcards to promote learning in medical students: retesting versus restudying

    Ralf Schmidmaier;Rene Ebersbach;Miriam Schiller;Inga Hege

  • How reliable is the classification of cognitive impairment across different criteria in early and late stages of multiple sclerosis

    Martin Fischer;Annett Kunkel;Peter Bublak;Jürgen H. Faiss

  • Characteristics of mentoring relationships formed by medical students and faculty

    Konstantinos Dimitriadis;Philip von der Borch;Sylvère Störmann;Felix G. Meinel

  • Blended learning in radiology: is self-determined learning really more effective?

    Andreas H. Mahnken;Martin Baumann;Michael Meister;Verena Schmitt

  • More mentoring needed? A cross-sectional study of mentoring programs for medical students in Germany

    Felix G Meinel;Konstantinos Dimitriadis;Philip von der Borch;Sylvère Störmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Fischer
Frank Fischer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Martin Reincke
Martin Reincke Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Iryna Gurevych
Iryna Gurevych Technical University of Darmstadt
Jan-Willem Strijbos
Jan-Willem Strijbos University of Groningen
Manfred Prenzel
Manfred Prenzel Technical University of Munich
Heinz Mandl
Heinz Mandl Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Matthias Schwab
Matthias Schwab University of Tübingen
Tina Seidel
Tina Seidel Technical University of Munich
Joachim Winter
Joachim Winter Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Martin McKee
Martin McKee London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online programs in Social Sciences and Humanities can offer flexible, accelerated options for busy professionals or recent graduates. Many students choose a master in psychology online to gain specialized knowledge while working, opening doors to careers in counseling, HR, or research.

For educators looking to advance quickly, there are options like accelerated edd programs, which provide a path to leadership roles in education in a condensed timeframe. Others might opt for one year graduate programs, perfect for those seeking to complete a master’s degree with minimal career interruption.

Bachelor’s students can also benefit from accelerated online programs, which enable faster completion, saving both time and cost. These online pathways increase access to education and make it easier to pursue new careers or advancement in fields like psychology, education, communication, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Martin R. Fischer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles