World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
43
Citations
10131
World Ranking
4337
National Ranking
116

Martin R. Fischer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin R. Fischer sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 385 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Martin R. Fischer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin R. Fischer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin R. Fischer is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a significant body of work addressing subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Family Practice, Education, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The major topics covered in Fischer's research include:

  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Empathy and Medical Education
  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning

Fischer has contributed to various scientific papers, among which recent notable publications are:

  • Using natural language processing to support peer-feedback in the age of artificial intelligence: A cross-disciplinary framework and a research agenda, 2023, British Journal of Educational Technology
  • Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact, 2020, BMC Medical Education
  • Investigating statistical literacy and scientific reasoning & argumentation in medical-, social sciences-, and economics students, 2021, Learning and Individual Differences
  • Representational scaffolding in digital simulations - learning professional practices in higher education, 2022, Information and Learning Sciences
  • Assessment of Diagnostic Competences With Standardized Patients Versus Virtual Patients: Experimental Study in the Context of History Taking, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research

Frequent co-authors in Fischer's research include:

  • Frank Fischer
  • Ralf Schmidmaier
  • Matthias Stadler
  • Jan Zottmann
  • Markus Berndt

The scientist's work has appeared in a variety of publication venues, notably:

  • PubMed
  • Computer-supported collaborative learning/The "Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference
  • Monatsschrift für Deutsches Recht
  • BMC Medical Education
  • MedEdPublish

Martin R. Fischer has also contributed to book publications, including:

  • Annals of the History and Philosophy of Biology 24/2019, published by Annals of the history and philosophy of biology, 2021
  • Interprofessionelle Bildung für die Gesundheitsversorgung, published by Springer Nature, 2024

Best Publications

  • Empathy decline and its reasons: a systematic review of studies with medical students and residents.

    Melanie Neumann;Friedrich Edelhäuser;Diethard Tauschel;Martin R. Fischer

  • A European Evidence-Based Guideline for the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes

    B. Paulweber;P. Valensi;J. Lindström;N. M. Lalic

  • Take action to prevent diabetes--the IMAGE toolkit for the prevention of type 2 diabetes in Europe.

    J. Lindström;A. Neumann;K. E. Sheppard;A. Gilis-Januszewska

  • Job requirements compared to medical school education: differences between graduates from problem-based learning and conventional curricula

    Christopher L Schlett;Hinnerk Doll;Janosch Dahmen;Ole Polacsek

  • An Introduction to the Inverted/Flipped Classroom Model in Education and Advanced Training in Medicine and in the Healthcare Professions.

    Daniel Tolks;Christine Schäfer;Tobias Raupach;Leona Kruse

  • Scientific Reasoning and Argumentation: Advancing an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda in Education

    Frank Fischer;Ingo Kollar;Stefan Ufer;Beate Sodian

  • The Role for Virtual Patients in the Future of Medical Education

    Norman B. Berman;Steven J. Durning;Martin R. Fischer;Soren Huwendiek

  • Case-Based Learning with Worked Examples in Complex Domains: Two Experimental Studies in Undergraduate Medical Education.

    Robin Stark;Veronika Kopp;Martin R. Fischer

  • Finally finished! National Competence Based Catalogues of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) and Dental Education (NKLZ) ready for trial

    Martin R. Fischer;Daniel Bauer;Karin Mohn;NKLM-Projektgruppe

  • Towards a typology of virtual patients.

    Sören Huwendiek;Bas A. De leng;Nabil Zary;Martin R. Fischer

  • Fostering diagnostic knowledge through computer-supported, case-based worked examples: effects of erroneous examples and feedback.

    Veronika Kopp;Robin Stark;Martin R Fischer

  • Fostering professional communication skills of future physicians and teachers: effects of e-learning with video cases and role-play

    Martin Gartmeier;Johannes Bauer;Martin R. Fischer;Tobias Hoppe-Seyler

  • Experiences with different integration strategies of case-based e-learning

    Inge Hege;Veronica Ropp;Martin Adler;Katja Radon

  • Facilitating Diagnostic Competences in Simulations in Higher Education: A Framework and a Research Agenda

    Nicole Heitzmann;Tina Seidel;Ansgar Opitz;Andreas Hetmanek

  • The use of Facebook in medical education--a literature review.

    Tanja Pander;Severin Pinilla;Konstantinos Dimitriadis;Martin R Fischer

  • Crew resource management training in healthcare: a systematic review of intervention design, training conditions and evaluation.

    Benedict Gross;Leonie Rusin;Jan Kiesewetter;Jan M Zottmann

  • Using electronic flashcards to promote learning in medical students: retesting versus restudying

    Ralf Schmidmaier;Rene Ebersbach;Miriam Schiller;Inga Hege

  • How reliable is the classification of cognitive impairment across different criteria in early and late stages of multiple sclerosis

    Martin Fischer;Annett Kunkel;Peter Bublak;Jürgen H. Faiss

  • Characteristics of mentoring relationships formed by medical students and faculty

    Konstantinos Dimitriadis;Philip von der Borch;Sylvère Störmann;Felix G. Meinel

  • Blended learning in radiology: is self-determined learning really more effective?

    Andreas H. Mahnken;Martin Baumann;Michael Meister;Verena Schmitt

  • More mentoring needed? A cross-sectional study of mentoring programs for medical students in Germany

    Felix G Meinel;Konstantinos Dimitriadis;Philip von der Borch;Sylvère Störmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Fischer
Frank Fischer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Martin Reincke
Martin Reincke Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Iryna Gurevych
Iryna Gurevych Technical University of Darmstadt
Jan-Willem Strijbos
Jan-Willem Strijbos University of Groningen
Manfred Prenzel
Manfred Prenzel Technical University of Munich
Heinz Mandl
Heinz Mandl Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Matthias Schwab
Matthias Schwab University of Tübingen
Tina Seidel
Tina Seidel Technical University of Munich
Joachim Winter
Joachim Winter Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Martin McKee
Martin McKee London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online programs in Social Sciences and Humanities can offer flexible, accelerated options for busy professionals or recent graduates. Many students choose a master in psychology online to gain specialized knowledge while working, opening doors to careers in counseling, HR, or research.

For educators looking to advance quickly, there are options like accelerated edd programs, which provide a path to leadership roles in education in a condensed timeframe. Others might opt for one year graduate programs, perfect for those seeking to complete a master’s degree with minimal career interruption.

Bachelor’s students can also benefit from accelerated online programs, which enable faster completion, saving both time and cost. These online pathways increase access to education and make it easier to pursue new careers or advancement in fields like psychology, education, communication, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Martin R. Fischer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles