World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 41 5087 4720 206 194 202 6518

Eliane Segers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eliane Segers between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eliane Segers published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2016. 31 of the 233 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2016. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 20 publications
1999 2025

233 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eliane Segers: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 2
2006 2
2007 0
2008 1
2009 2
2010 4
2011 8
2012 8
2013 12
2014 11
2015 9
2016 26
2017 16
2018 18
2019 18
2020 15
2021 16
2022 20
2023 9
2024 11
2025 20
Total 233
Download as CSV

Eliane Segers publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eliane Segers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 202 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 202
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Eliane Segers D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eliane Segers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308 41
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Eliane Segers is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and focuses on research primarily within the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their work concentrates on developmental and educational psychology, reflecting a sustained engagement with reading and literacy development as well as language development and disorders.

Their research spans several key subfields including cognitive neuroscience, statistics and probability, and information systems. Segers's work addresses a range of topics related to cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, child development and digital technology, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, second language acquisition and learning, and tactile and sensory interactions.

Segers has authored numerous papers, with recent notable publications including:

  • "Effects of audio support on multimedia learning processes and outcomes in students with dyslexia" (2020), published in Computers & Education
  • "Impact of Children's math self-concept, math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and teacher competencies on math development" (2020), published in Teaching and Teacher Education
  • "Computer-supported early literacy intervention effects in preschool and kindergarten: A meta-analysis" (2020), published in Educational Research Review
  • "First and second language vocabulary affect early second language reading comprehension development" (2020), published in Journal of Research in Reading
  • "Fostering integration of informational texts and virtual labs during inquiry-based learning" (2020), published in Contemporary Educational Psychology

Eliane Segers' network of frequent co-authors includes Ludo Verhoeven, Tijs Kleemans, Marian Bruggink, Nicole Swart, and Annelies van der Lee.

The scientist publishes often in several recurring venues, including:

  • Learning and Individual Differences
  • Annals of Dyslexia
  • Journal of Research in Reading
  • Reading and Writing
  • The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

Segers also contributes to academic book literature with publications through IEA research for educators. Notable book titles include Putting PIRLS to Use in Classrooms Across the Globe (2022) and Teaching Reading Comprehension in a Digital World (2025).

Best Publications

  • Child and Home Predictors of Early Numeracy Skills in Kindergarten.

    Tijs Kleemans;Marieke Peeters;Eliane Segers;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Classroom ratings of likeability and popularity are related to the Big Five and the general factor of personality

    Dimitri van der Linden;Ron H.J. Scholte;Antonius H.N. Cillessen;Jan te Nijenhuis

  • Multimedia support of early literacy learning

    Eliane Segers;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Long‐term effects of computer training of phonological awareness in kindergarten

    Eliane Segers;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Social Intelligence and Academic Achievement as Predictors of Adolescent Popularity

    Noortje Meijs;Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Antonius H. N. Cillessen;Ron H. J. Scholte;Eliane Segers

  • Changing Peer Perceptions and Victimization through Classroom Arrangements: A Field Experiment

    Yvonne H. M. van den Berg;Eliane Segers;Antonius H. N. Cillessen

  • Considerations for classroom seating arrangements and the role of teacher characteristics and beliefs

    Mariola C. Gremmen;Yvonne H. M. van den Berg;Eliane Segers;Antonius H. N. Cillessen

  • Learning in a sheltered Internet environment: The use of WebQuests

    Eliane Segers;Ludo Verhoeven

  • How cognitive factors affect language development in children with intellectual disabilities.

    Margje van der Schuit;Eliane Segers;Hans van Balkom;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Neurocognitive mechanisms of the “testing effect”: A review

    Gesa van den Broek;Atsuko Takashima;Carola Wiklund-Hörnqvist;Linnea Karlsson Wirebring

  • Cognitive and linguistic precursors to numeracy in kindergarten: Evidence from first and second language learners

    Tijs Kleemans;Eliane Segers;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Role of Parent Literacy and Numeracy Expectations and Activities in Predicting Early Numeracy Skills

    Eliane Segers;Tijs Kleemans;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Neural correlates of testing effects in vocabulary learning.

    Gesa S. E. van den Broek;Atsuko Takashima;Eliane Segers;Guillén Fernández;Guillén Fernández

  • Computer-Supported Phonological Awareness Intervention for Kindergarten Children With Specific Language Impairment

    Eliane Segers;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Effects of vocabulary training by computer in kindergarten

    Eliane Segers;Ludo Verhoeven

  • A Special Font for People with Dyslexia: Does it Work and, if so, why?

    Eva Marinus;Michelle Mostard;Eliane Segers;Teresa M. Schubert

  • Teacher-Mediated Versus Computer-Mediated Storybook Reading to Children in Native and Multicultural Kindergarten Classrooms

    Eliane Segers;Lianne Takke;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Impact of Children's math self-concept, math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and teacher competencies on math development

    Jarise Kaskens;Jarise Kaskens;Eliane Segers;Sui Lin Goei;Sui Lin Goei;Johannes E.H. van Luit

  • How phonological awareness mediates the relation between working memory and word reading efficiency in children with dyslexia

    Carolien A. N. Knoop‐van Campen;Eliane Segers;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Scientific Reasoning Abilities in Kindergarten: Dynamic Assessment of the Control of Variables Strategy.

    Joep van der Graaf;Eliane Segers;Ludo Verhoeven

  • Cognitive processes in children's multimedia text learning

    Eliane Segers;Ludo Verhoeven;Nanneke Hulstijn-Hendrikse

  • Professional practices and opinions about services available to bilingual children with developmental disabilities: An international study.

    Stefka H. Marinova-Todd;Paola Colozzo;Pat Mirenda;Hillary Stahl

  • Effects of audio support on multimedia learning processes and outcomes in students with dyslexia

    Carolien A.N. Knoop-van Campen;Eliane Segers;Ludo Verhoeven

Frequent Co-Authors

Ludo Verhoeven
Ludo Verhoeven Radboud University
Antonius H. N. Cillessen
Antonius H. N. Cillessen Radboud University
Inge Molenaar
Inge Molenaar Radboud University
James M. McQueen
James M. McQueen Radboud University
Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Ron H. J. Scholte
Ron H. J. Scholte Radboud University
Holger Mitterer
Holger Mitterer University of Malta
Peter F. de Jong
Peter F. de Jong University of Amsterdam
William J. Burk
William J. Burk Radboud University
Kate Cain
Kate Cain Lancaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in Social Sciences or Humanities in the USA continues to open exciting opportunities in a range of careers. With the flexibility of online education, students today can choose from a variety of accelerated online programs to complete their training faster and start their professional journey sooner.

Many students interested in counseling or mental health professions explore getting a masters in psychology. This degree can lead to roles in clinical settings, research, or organizational consultation.

Those looking to advance into leadership, especially in education, are increasingly opting for edd degrees. These programs often focus on educational administration and policy, ideal for those pursuing high-level positions.

Online learning also allows for more efficient routes—such as enrolling in one of the online masters programs that can be completed in just a year. These options provide valuable credentials for graduates wanting to pivot careers or upskill quickly.

Best Scientists Citing Eliane Segers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles