World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
15889
World Ranking
7283
National Ranking
201

Hedderik van Rijn publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hedderik van Rijn sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 180 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Hedderik van Rijn D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hedderik van Rijn sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hedderik van Rijn is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Neuroscience, with a significant portion dedicated to Cognitive Neuroscience. Additional areas of study include Developmental and Educational Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Statistics and Probability.

Their work covers diverse topics within neuroscience, including:

  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Van Rijn has contributed to numerous publications in key scientific venues, frequently appearing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by van Rijn include:

  • Temporal Context Actively Shapes EEG Signatures of Time Perception, 2021, Journal of Neuroscience
  • Lockdown Learning: Changes in Online Foreign-Language Study Activity and Performance of Dutch Secondary School Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2021, Frontiers in Education
  • FMTP: A unifying computational framework of temporal preparation across time scales., 2022, Psychological Review
  • Alleviating the Cold Start Problem in Adaptive Learning using Data-Driven Difficulty Estimates, 2021, Computational Brain & Behavior
  • Predicting University Students' Exam Performance Using a Model-Based Adaptive Fact-Learning System, 2021, Journal of Learning Analytics

Van Rijn frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their most common co-authors are:

  • Florian Sense
  • M. van der Velde
  • Wouter Kruijne
  • Andrea Stocco
  • Thomas Wilschut

Best Publications

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Alexander A. Aarts;Joanna E. Anderson;Christopher J. Anderson;Peter R. Attridge;Peter R. Attridge

  • Pupil dilation deconvolution reveals the dynamics of attention at high temporal resolution

    Stefan M. Wierda;Hedderik van Rijn;Niels A. Taatgen;Sander Martens

  • An integrated theory of prospective time interval estimation: The role of cognition, attention, and learning.

    Niels A. Taatgen;Hedderik van Rijn;John Anderson

  • The problem state: a cognitive bottleneck in multitasking.

    Jelmer P. Borst;Niels A. Taatgen;Hedderik van Rijn

  • Analyzing the Time Course of Pupillometric Data.

    Jacolien van Rij;Petra Hendriks;Hedderik van Rijn;R. Harald Baayen

  • Contingent negative variation and its relation to time estimation: a theoretical evaluation.

    Hedderik Van Rijn;Tadeusz Władyslaw Kononowicz;Warren H Meck;Kwun Kei Ng

  • What Makes Interruptions Disruptive?: A Process-Model Account of the Effects of the Problem State Bottleneck on Task Interruption and Resumption

    Jelmer P. Borst;Niels A. Taatgen;Hedderik van Rijn

  • Oscillatory multiplexing of neural population codes for interval timing and working memory

    Bon-Mi Gu;Hedderik van Rijn;Warren H. Meck

  • Stroop and picture-word interference are two sides of the same coin.

    Leendert van Maanen;Hedderik van Rijn;Jelmer P. Borst

  • The Effect of Horizontal Eye Movements on Free Recall: A Preregistered Adversarial Collaboration

    Dora Matzke;Sander Nieuwenhuis;Hedderik van Rijn;Heleen A Slagter

  • Decoupling Interval Timing and Climbing Neural Activity: A Dissociation between CNV and N1P2 Amplitudes

    Tadeusz W. Kononowicz;Hedderik van Rijn

  • Trial-by-trial fluctuations in CNV amplitude reflect anticipatory adjustment of response caution.

    Udo Boehm;Leendert van Maanen;Birte U. Forstmann;Hedderik van Rijn

  • Single trial beta oscillations index time estimation

    Tadeusz W. Kononowicz;Tadeusz W. Kononowicz;Hedderik van Rijn

  • Dedicated Clock/Timing-Circuit Theories of Time Perception and Timed Performance

    Hedderik van Rijn;Bon-Mi Gu;Warren H. Meck

  • On making the Right Choice: A Meta-Analysis and Large-Scale Replication Attempt of the Unconscious Thought Advantage

    Mark R. Nieuwenstein;Tjardie Wierenga;Richard D. Morey;Jelte M. Wicherts

  • A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task.

    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers;Mark Steyvers;Jeroen G.W. Raaijmakers;Richard M. Shiffrin

  • Fronto-parietal network oscillations reveal relationship between working memory capacity and cognitive control

    Rasa Gulbinaite;Hedderik van Rijn;Michael X. Cohen

  • Timing of multiple overlapping intervals: How many clocks do we have?

    Hedderik van Rijn;Niels A. Taatgen

  • Cognitive architectures and language acquisition: a case study in pronoun comprehension.

    Jacolien van Rij;Hedderik van Rijn;Petra Hendriks

  • Traces of times past: representations of temporal intervals in memory.

    Niels Taatgen;Hedderik van Rijn

  • Subjective Duration as a Signature of Coding Efficiency : Emerging Links Among Stimulus Repetition, Predictive Coding, and Cortical GABA Levels

    William J. Matthews;Devin B. Terhune;Hedderik van Rijn;David M. Eagleman

  • Timing and Time Perception: A Critical Review of Neural Timing Signatures Before, During, and After the To‐Be‐Timed Interval

    Tadeusz W. Kononowicz;Hedderik van Rijn;Warren H. Meck

Frequent Co-Authors

Niels Taatgen
Niels Taatgen University of Groningen
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam
Warren H. Meck
Warren H. Meck Duke University
Tamim Asfour
Tamim Asfour Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Christian N. L. Olivers
Christian N. L. Olivers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Richard D. Morey
Richard D. Morey Cardiff University
Heleen A. Slagter
Heleen A. Slagter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Birte U. Forstmann
Birte U. Forstmann University of Amsterdam
Maurits W. van der Molen
Maurits W. van der Molen University of Amsterdam
John R. Anderson
John R. Anderson Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience opens the door to diverse career paths, from research and healthcare to technology and education. For students looking to begin or advance their studies quickly, pursuing an online accelerated bachelor's degree can offer flexibility and a faster track to graduation.

When considering your academic path, it’s wise to explore some of the best degrees in the world. Many science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) majors are highly valued and have impressive earning potential after graduation.

If you’re seeking both job satisfaction and strong salaries, take a look at fun majors in college that pay well. Neuroscience can intersect with bioinformatics, psychology, or even data science, allowing graduates to pursue exciting and well-compensated roles.

Finally, financing your education is crucial. Prospective students often search for the cheapest online college options that accept federal aid, making higher education more accessible and affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Hedderik van Rijn

Trending Scientists