World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
53
Citations
28074
World Ranking
2214
National Ranking
27

Anna Dreber publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Dreber sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 171 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Anna Dreber D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Dreber sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anna Dreber is affiliated with the Stockholm School of Economics in Sweden. Their research spans across several subfields, prominently Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty; Sociology and Political Science; Safety Research; Cognitive Neuroscience; and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their work extensively covers topics including Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Scientometrics and Bibliometrics Research, Sexual Differentiation and Disorders, as well as Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Dreber include Magnus Johannesson, Felix Holzmeister, Thomas Pfeiffer, Michael Kirchler, and Jürgen Huber.

Dreber's publications appear regularly in notable venues. These include SSRN Electronic Journal with 23 publications, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Royal Society Open Science with 5 publications each, Nature with 2, and Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes also with 2.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams (2020, Nature)
  • Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021, Annual Review of Psychology)
  • Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results (2020, Psychological Bulletin)
  • #EEGManyLabs: Investigating the replicability of influential EEG experiments (2021, Cortex)
  • Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability (2020, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science)

Best Publications

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Alexander A. Aarts;Joanna E. Anderson;Christopher J. Anderson;Peter R. Attridge;Peter R. Attridge

  • Redefine statistical significance

    Daniel J. Benjamin;James O. Berger;Magnus Johannesson;Magnus Johannesson;Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek

  • Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015

    Colin F. Camerer;Anna Dreber;Felix Holzmeister;Teck-Hua Ho

  • Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in Economics

    Colin Camerer;Anna Dreber;Eskil Forsell;Teck Ho

  • Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams

    Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Felix Holzmeister;Colin F. Camerer;Anna Dreber;Anna Dreber

  • Winners don’t punish

    Anna Dreber;David G. Rand;Drew Fudenberg;Martin A. Nowak

  • Positive Interactions Promote Public Cooperation

    David G. Rand;Anna Dreber;Anna Dreber;Tore Ellingsen;Drew Fudenberg

  • Gender, stock market participation and financial literacy

    Johan Almenberg;Anna Dreber

  • Testosterone and financial risk preferences

    Coren L. Apicella;Anna Dreber;Anna Dreber;Benjamin Campbell;Peter B. Gray

  • Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science

    Brian A. Nosek;Brian A. Nosek;Tom E. Hardwicke;Hannah Moshontz;Aurélien Allard

  • Gender differences in deception

    Anna Dreber;Magnus Johannesson

  • Slow to Anger and Fast to Forgive: Cooperation in an Uncertain World

    Drew Fudenberg;David G. Rand;Anna Dreber

  • Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research

    Anna Dreber;Thomas Pfeiffer;Johan Almenberg;Siri Isaksson

  • Assessing the Robustness of Power Posing No Effect on Hormones and Risk Tolerance in a Large Sample of Men and Women

    Eva Ranehill;Anna Dreber;Magnus Johannesson;Susanne Leiberg

  • Gender differences in competitiveness and risk taking: comparing children in Colombia and Sweden *

    Juan.Camilo Cárdenas;Anna Dreber;Emma von Essen;Eva Ranehill

  • The 7R polymorphism in the dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4) is associated with financial risk taking in men

    Anna Dreber;Anna Dreber;Coren L. Apicella;Dan T.A. Eisenberg;Justin R. Garcia

  • Do people care about social context? Framing effects in dictator games

    Anna Dreber;Tore Ellingsen;Magnus Johannesson;David G. Rand

  • Do More Expensive Wines Taste Better? Evidence from a Large Sample of Blind Tastings*

    Robin Goldstein;Johan Almenberg;Anna Dreber;John W. Emerson

  • Gender and competition in adolescence: task matters

    Anna Dreber;Emma von Essen;Eva Ranehill

  • Outrunning the gender gap: Boys and girls compete equally

    Anna Dreber;Emma von Essen;Eva Ranehill

Frequent Co-Authors

Magnus Johannesson
Magnus Johannesson Stockholm School of Economics
David G. Rand
David G. Rand Cornell University
Brian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek Center for Open Science
Colin F. Camerer
Colin F. Camerer California Institute of Technology
Michael Kirchler
Michael Kirchler University of Innsbruck
Coren L. Apicella
Coren L. Apicella University of Pennsylvania
Justin R. Garcia
Justin R. Garcia Indiana University
Richard J. Zeckhauser
Richard J. Zeckhauser Harvard University
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and diverse career pathways. Many students are looking for flexible and affordable programs to suit their needs, and online options have become more accessible than ever.

Those interested in social work can now pursue online msw programs that offer both affordability and versatility. For individuals aiming to work with children or in behavioral analysis, there are specialized bcba online masters programs that can help prepare for board certification and practical roles in education or therapy.

If you're looking to earn your credentials quickly, an accelerated msw program online provides a faster route to professional opportunities in social work. Likewise, psychology enthusiasts can start their careers sooner with a 2 year psychology degree online, helping graduates enter fields such as counseling, social services, or business.

Online programs in these fields not only offer convenience but also address the ongoing need for educated professionals in social sciences and humanities, making them valuable options for today's students.

Best Scientists Citing Anna Dreber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles