World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eric Luis Uhlmann

Eric Luis Uhlmann

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7379 6881 69 67 103 14456

Eric Luis Uhlmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eric Luis Uhlmann between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eric Luis Uhlmann published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2014. 17 of the 141 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2014. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 5 publications
2002 2025

141 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eric Luis Uhlmann: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 2
2004 1
2005 5
2006 1
2007 5
2008 5
2009 5
2010 4
2011 6
2012 10
2013 8
2014 13
2015 7
2016 13
2017 3
2018 11
2019 7
2020 4
2021 7
2022 2
2023 3
2024 12
2025 5
Total 141
Download as CSV

Eric Luis Uhlmann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Luis Uhlmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 103 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 103
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Eric Luis Uhlmann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric Luis Uhlmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Eric Luis Uhlmann is affiliated with INSEAD in France. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with significant contributions in subfields such as sociology and political science, applied psychology, cognitive neuroscience, artificial intelligence, and statistics, probability, and uncertainty.

The scientist's work covers diverse topics including social and intergroup psychology, behavioral health and interventions, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, decision-making and behavioral economics, meta-analysis and systematic reviews, names, identity, and discrimination research, as well as gender diversity and inequality.

Frequent publication venues for Uhlmann include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • Royal Society Open Science
  • Psychological Bulletin

They have co-authored multiple papers with several researchers, notably:

  • Warren Tierney
  • Anna Dreber
  • Magnus Johannesson
  • Thomas Pfeiffer
  • Wilson Cyrus-Lai

Among recent publications, key papers include:

  • Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results, 2020, Psychological Bulletin
  • Putting the Self in Self-Correction: Findings From the Loss-of-Confidence Project, 2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Creative destruction in science, 2020, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • On the trajectory of discrimination: A meta-analysis and forecasting survey capturing 44 years of field experiments on gender and hiring decisions, 2023, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  • A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures, 2020, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Best Publications

  • Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.

    Anthony G. Greenwald;T. Andrew Poehlman;Eric Luis Uhlmann;Mahzarin R. Banaji

  • Many analysts, one dataset: Making transparent how variations in analytical choices affect results

    R. Silberzahn;E. L. Uhlmann;D. P. Martin;P. Anselmi

  • Can an Angry Woman Get Ahead? Status Conferral, Gender, and Expression of Emotion in the Workplace

    Victoria L. Brescoll;Eric Luis Uhlmann

  • Constructed Criteria Redefining Merit to Justify Discrimination

    Eric Luis Uhlmann;Geoffrey L. Cohen

  • Exposure to violent video games increases automatic aggressiveness

    Eric Uhlmann;Jane Swanson

  • A Person-Centered Approach to Moral Judgment:

    Eric Luis Uhlmann;David A. Pizarro;Daniel Diermeier

  • Moral heuristics. Commentaries. Author's reply

    Cass R. Sunstein;Matthew D. Adler;Christopher J. Anderson;Elizabeth Anderson

  • The motivated use of moral principles

    Eric Luis Uhlmann;David A. Pizarro;David Tannenbaum;Peter H. Ditto

  • Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results

    R Silberzahn;E L Uhlmann;D P Martin

  • Asymmetry in Judgments of Moral Blame and Praise The Role of Perceived Metadesires

    David Pizarro;Eric Uhlmann;Peter Salovey

  • "I think it, therefore it's true": Effects of self-perceived objectivity on hiring discrimination.

    Eric Luis Uhlmann;Geoffrey L. Cohen

  • Attitudes toward Traditional and Nontraditional Parents.

    Victoria L. Brescoll;Eric Luis Uhlmann

  • Subgroup prejudice based on skin color among Hispanics in the United States and Latin America

    Eric Uhlmann;Nilanjana Dasgupta;Angelica Elgueta;Anthony G. Greenwald

  • Crowdsourced research: Many hands make tight work.

    Raphael Silberzahn;Eric Luis Uhlmann

  • Causal deviance and the attribution of moral responsibility

    David A. Pizarro;Eric Uhlmann;Paul Bloom

  • Hard Won and Easily Lost The Fragile Status of Leaders in Gender-Stereotype-Incongruent Occupations

    Victoria L. Brescoll;Erica Dawson;Eric Luis Uhlmann

  • The effects of system-justifying motives on endorsement of essentialist explanations for gender differences

    Victoria Brescoll;Eric Luis Uhlmann;George E. Newman

  • Getting Explicit About the Implicit: A Taxonomy of Implicit Measures and Guide for Their Use in Organizational Research

    Eric Luis Uhlmann;Keith Leavitt;Jochen I. Menges;Joel Koopman

  • Moral signals, public outrage, and immaterial harms

    David Tannenbaum;Eric Luis Uhlmann;Daniel Diermeier

  • When it takes a bad person to do the right thing

    Eric Luis Uhlmann;Luke Lei Zhu;David Tannenbaum

  • Can an Angry Woman Get Ahead? Status Conferral, Gender, and Expression of Emotion in the Workplace

    Eric Luis Uhlmann;Victoria Brescoll

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Pizarro
David A. Pizarro Cornell University
Daniel Diermeier
Daniel Diermeier Vanderbilt University
Magnus Johannesson
Magnus Johannesson Stockholm School of Economics
George E. Newman
George E. Newman Yale University
Anna Dreber
Anna Dreber Stockholm School of Economics
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam
Jay J. Van Bavel
Jay J. Van Bavel New York University
Peter H. Ditto
Peter H. Ditto University of California, Irvine
Brian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek Center for Open Science
Andrei Cimpian
Andrei Cimpian New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up a range of dynamic career pathways, especially if you're considering becoming a licensed therapist. Online programs can prepare you for the educational requirements and flexible study options needed to pursue licensure in various U.S. cities.

However, it’s crucial to understand that licensed therapist requirements in Toledo, Tucson licensed therapist requirements, licensed therapist requirements in Tulsa, and licensed therapist requirements in Virginia Beach may have key differences. These differences include supervised clinical hours, specific coursework, and state licensing exams.

When choosing an online psychology degree, check that your program meets the specific licensing criteria in your desired location. Completing the right degree and supervised experience is essential for eligibility to practice. Always confirm up-to-date requirements for your state before starting your educational pathway, ensuring your degree supports your career goals as a future therapist or counselor.

Best Scientists Citing Eric Luis Uhlmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles