World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
43
Citations
9047
World Ranking
405
National Ranking
228

Daniel Diermeier publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Diermeier sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 180 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Daniel Diermeier D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Diermeier sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Daniel Diermeier is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research primarily situates within the broader field of Social Sciences, with a concentration on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Communication, Sociology and Political Science, and Safety Research.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including:

  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Game Theory and Voting Systems
  • Economic Policies and Impacts
  • Media Influence and Politics
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Notable recent publications by Daniel Diermeier include:

  • "Dynamics of Polarization: Affective Partisanship and Policy Divergence" (2022) published in the British Journal of Political Science
  • "A Formal Theory of Public Opinion" (2025) published in the Quarterly Journal of Political Science

Diermeier has collaborated with various co-authors including Costel Andonie, with whom there are multiple joint works, as well as Christopher Li, Michael Schnabel, and Tong Li.

Frequent publication venues associated with Diermeier's work include:

  • British Journal of Political Science
  • Social Choice and Welfare
  • Public Choice
  • Quarterly Journal of Political Science

The scientist has been recognized with several awards, such as being named a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 2014 and a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure

    Daniel Diermeier;Timothy J. Feddersen

  • Strategic Activism and Nonmarket Strategy

    David P. Baron;Daniel Diermeier

  • A political economy model of congressional careers

    Daniel Diermeier;Michael Keane;Antonio Merlo

  • A Person-Centered Approach to Moral Judgment:

    Eric Luis Uhlmann;David A. Pizarro;Daniel Diermeier

  • Institutionalism as a Methodology

    Daniel Diermeier;Keith Krehbiel

  • Elections, Governments, and Parliaments in Proportional Representation Systems

    David P. Baron;Daniel Diermeier

  • Cabinet Survival and Competing Risks

    Daniel Diermeier;Randy T. Stevenson

  • Bicameralism and Its Consequences for the Internal Organization of Legislatures

    Daniel Diermeier;Roger B. Myerson

  • A Behavioral Model of Turnout

    Jonathan Bendor;Daniel Diermeier;Michael Ting

  • Government Turnover in Parliamentary Democracies

    Daniel Diermeier;Antonio Merlo

  • A STRUCTURAL MODEL OF GOVERNMENT FORMATION

    Daniel Diermeier;Hülya Eraslan;Antonio Merlo

  • Language and Ideology in Congress

    Daniel Diermeier;Jean François Godbout;Bei Yu;Stefan Kaufmann

  • An empirical investigation of coalitional bargaining procedures

    Daniel Diermeier;Antonio Merlo

  • Classifying Party Affiliation from Political Speech

    Bei Yu;Stefan Kaufmann;Daniel Diermeier

  • Moral signals, public outrage, and immaterial harms

    David Tannenbaum;Eric Luis Uhlmann;Daniel Diermeier

  • A Behavioral Theory of Elections

    Jonathan Bendor;Daniel Diermeier;David A. Siegel;Michael M. Ting

  • Cabinet Terminations and Critical Events

    Daniel Diermeier;Randolph T. Stevenson

  • Information and congressional hearings

    Daniel Diermeier;Timothy J. Feddersen

  • Legislative Bargaining with Reconsideration

    Daniel Diermeier;Pohan Fong

  • Experiments in Majoritarian Bargaining

    Daniel Diermeier;Rebecca Morton

  • The pipeline project : Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline

    Martin Schweinsberg;Nikhil Madan;Michelangelo Vianello;S. Amy Sommer

  • The Duration of Cabinet Formation Processes in Western Multi-Party Democracies

    Daniel Diermeier;Peter Van Roozendaal

  • Commitment, Deference, and Legislative Institutions

    Daniel Diermeier

  • Corporations are Cyborgs: Organizations elicit anger but not sympathy when they can think but cannot feel

    Tage S. Rai;Daniel Diermeier

  • A Political Economy Model of Congressional Careers, Second Version

    Daniel Diermeier;Michael P. Keane;Michael P. Keane;Antonio Merlo;Antonio Merlo

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Merlo
Antonio Merlo Drexel University
Michael M. Ting
Michael M. Ting Columbia University
David P. Baron
David P. Baron Stanford University
Konstantin Sonin
Konstantin Sonin University of Chicago
Michael Keane
Michael Keane Johns Hopkins University
Jan A. Van Mieghem
Jan A. Van Mieghem Northwestern University
Bei Yu
Bei Yu Chinese University of Hong Kong
Wallace J. Hopp
Wallace J. Hopp University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jay J. Van Bavel
Jay J. Van Bavel New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science in the USA opens doors to a wide array of academic and professional opportunities. Many students consider combining their studies with other fields. If you’re interested in broadening your expertise, a master's interdisciplinary studies program allows you to tailor your education to specific interests, such as global affairs or economics.

For those intrigued by the historical foundations of politics, pursuing online history MA degrees can deepen your understanding of past events that shape today’s policies. Unsure where this path leads? Learn more about what can you do with a history degree to explore diverse options—including research, government, and education.

Additionally, certifications are a fast way to boost employability in government, business, or nonprofit sectors. If you want to increase your skills quickly, check out easy certifications to get that can complement your Political Science degree and unlock rewarding career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Diermeier

Trending Scientists