World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
67
Citations
25402
World Ranking
2495
National Ranking
316

Simon Andrews publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon Andrews sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 134 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Simon Andrews D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simon Andrews sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Simon Andrews is affiliated with the Babraham Institute in the United Kingdom and has contributed to several fields of scientific research spanning biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and computer science. Their work bridges both biological sciences and technology-focused domains, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to research.

Andrews has published research in important venues such as Reproduction and Design for Health. Their publications have focused on areas including reproductive biology, epigenetics, human-computer interaction, and public health.

Two recent papers illustrate the scope of their research interests:

  • Single-cell multiomic analysis reveals methylome and transcriptome deviations following oocyte maturation in vitro, 2025, Reproduction
  • Human-centred design research during the pandemic: using an online survey to inform personas of women at risk of hip fracture, 2023, Design for Health

The first study addresses molecular and epigenetic changes during oocyte maturation, combining multiomic techniques to analyze methylome and transcriptome alterations. The second paper explores human-centred design by creating personas to understand the risk factors affecting women prone to hip fractures, emphasizing the use of online survey methodologies during the pandemic.

Andrews frequently collaborates with a range of researchers including Camilla Benedetti, Carlo Giaccari, Francesco Cecere, Yannick Gansemans, and Gavin Kelsey. Such partnerships support a cross-disciplinary approach within both the life sciences and technology domains.

Their primary fields of study include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Computer Science

Within these broader disciplines, their subfields extend to:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Demography

The main topics explored in their work reflect a combination of biological and technological themes:

  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Persona Design and Applications
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Technology Use by Older Adults

This overview demonstrates Simon Andrews's engagement at the intersection of molecular biology and computational methods with applications in public health and user-centered design.

Best Publications

  • Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications.

    Felix Krueger;Simon R. Andrews

  • Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation

    Gabriella Ficz;Miguel R. Branco;Stefanie Seisenberger;Fátima Santos

  • Single-cell genome-wide bisulfite sequencing for assessing epigenetic heterogeneity

    Sébastien A Smallwood;Heather J Lee;Heather J Lee;Christof Angermueller;Felix Krueger

  • FastQ Screen: A tool for multi-genome mapping and quality control

    Steven W. Wingett;Simon Andrews

  • Mapping long-range promoter contacts in human cells with high-resolution capture Hi-C

    Borbala Mifsud;Filipe Tavares-Cadete;Alice N Young;Robert Sugar

  • Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by Aid deficiency

    Christian Popp;Wendy Dean;Suhua Feng;Shawn J. Cokus

  • The Dynamics of Genome-wide DNA Methylation Reprogramming in Mouse Primordial Germ Cells

    Stefanie Seisenberger;Simon Andrews;Felix Krueger;Julia Arand

  • Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells

    Stefan Schoenfelder;Tom Sexton;Lyubomira Chakalova;Nathan F Cope

  • Dynamic CpG island methylation landscape in oocytes and preimplantation embryos

    Sébastien A Smallwood;Shin-ichi Tomizawa;Felix Krueger;Nico Ruf

  • HiCUP: pipeline for mapping and processing Hi-C data

    Steven Wingett;Philip Ewels;Mayra Furlan-Magaril;Takashi Nagano

  • The pluripotent regulatory circuitry connecting promoters to their long-range interacting elements

    Stefan Schoenfelder;Mayra Furlan-Magaril;Borbala Mifsud;Filipe Tavares-Cadete;Filipe Tavares-Cadete

  • FGF Signaling Inhibition in ESCs Drives Rapid Genome-wide Demethylation to the Epigenetic Ground State of Pluripotency

    Gabriella Ficz;Timothy A. Hore;Fátima Santos;Heather J. Lee

  • Global Mapping of DNA Methylation in Mouse Promoters Reveals Epigenetic Reprogramming of Pluripotency Genes

    Cassandra R. Farthing;Gabriella Ficz;Ray Kit Ng;Chun-Fung Chan

  • DNA methylome analysis using short bisulfite sequencing data

    Felix Krueger;Benjamin Kreck;Andre Franke;Simon R Andrews

  • Polycomb repressive complex PRC1 spatially constrains the mouse embryonic stem cell genome

    Stefan Schoenfelder;Robert Sugar;Andrew Dimond;Biola-Maria Javierre

  • A screen for hydroxymethylcytosine and formylcytosine binding proteins suggests functions in transcription and chromatin regulation

    Mario Iurlaro;Gabriella Ficz;David Oxley;Eun-Ang Raiber

  • Global Reorganization of the Nuclear Landscape in Senescent Cells

    Tamir Chandra;Tamir Chandra;Philip Andrew Ewels;Stefan Schoenfelder;Mayra Furlan-Magaril

  • PI(3)Kgamma has an important context-dependent role in neutrophil chemokinesis

    G John Ferguson;Laura Milne;Suhasini Kulkarni;Takehiko Sasaki

  • Unbiased analysis of potential targets of breast cancer susceptibility loci by Capture Hi-C

    Nicola H. Dryden;Laura R. Broome;Frank Dudbridge;Nichola Johnson

  • Dynamic stage-specific changes in imprinted differentially methylated regions during early mammalian development and prevalence of non-CpG methylation in oocytes

    Shin Ichi Tomizawa;Hisato Kobayashi;Hisato Kobayashi;Toshiaki Watanabe;Toshiaki Watanabe;Simon Andrews

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolf Reik
Wolf Reik Babraham Institute
Gavin Kelsey
Gavin Kelsey Babraham Institute
Peter Fraser
Peter Fraser Florida State University
Wendy Dean
Wendy Dean Babraham Institute
Len R. Stephens
Len R. Stephens Babraham Institute
Phillip T. Hawkins
Phillip T. Hawkins Babraham Institute
Martin R. Turner
Martin R. Turner University of Oxford
Myriam Hemberger
Myriam Hemberger University of Calgary
Michael P. Coleman
Michael P. Coleman University of Cambridge
Simon J. Cook
Simon J. Cook Babraham Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in genetics opens doors to many related fields in healthcare and science. If you’re considering a broader path or seeking flexible study options, there are a variety of online degrees to consider. Many healthcare programs, from nursing to administration, offer accelerated or more accessible entry points for motivated students.

For those interested in nursing, it’s important to know that do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school is a common question. Some schools now offer admissions without this standardized test, making entry smoother for aspiring nurses. If administrative roles appeal more to you, understanding the cost of mha degree can help you choose an affordable and reputable master’s program.

For those wanting to enter the workforce swiftly, fast track lpn programs online offer an efficient way to start a career in practical nursing. And if advanced nursing is your goal, it’s worth exploring the cheapest online dnp programs to balance both career advancement and affordability.

These alternative pathways demonstrate the variety of educational options that support or complement a focus on genetics, making it easier for students to find the right fit for their interests and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Simon Andrews

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles