World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
63
Citations
16606
World Ranking
3365
National Ranking
306

Michael P. Coleman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael P. Coleman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 138 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael P. Coleman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael P. Coleman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael P. Coleman is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in United Kingdom. Their research predominantly spans several interconnected fields including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Medicine, and Neuroscience, with specific concentration on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Neurology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

The main topics of work addressed by Coleman encompass Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine, Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, Signaling Pathways in Disease, Mitochondrial Function and Pathology, Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research.

Recent notable publications authored or co-authored by Coleman include:

  • Programmed axon degeneration: from mouse to mechanism to medicine, 2020, Nature reviews. Neuroscience
  • Human endogenous retrovirus HERV-K(HML-2) RNA causes neurodegeneration through Toll-like receptors, 2020, JCI Insight
  • SARM1 is a multi-functional NAD(P)ase with prominent base exchange activity, all regulated by multiple physiologically relevant NAD metabolites, 2022, iScience
  • Enrichment of SARM1 alleles encoding variants with constitutively hyperactive NADase in patients with ALS and other motor nerve disorders, 2021, eLife
  • Structural basis for RING-Cys-Relay E3 ligase activity and its role in axon integrity, 2020, Nature Chemical Biology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Coleman include Jonathan Gilley, Andrea Loreto, Giuseppe Orsomando, Elisa Merlini, and Peter Arthur-Farraj.

Coleman's work appears in several publication venues with multiple contributions to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Neurotherapeutics, Nature Communications, eLife, and Nature reviews. Neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Axon degeneration mechanisms: commonality amid diversity

    Michael Coleman

  • Neuronal Cell Death.

    Michael Fricker;Abby Miriam Tolkovsky;Vilmante Borutaite;Michael Philip Coleman

  • Wallerian degeneration: an emerging axon death pathway linking injury and disease

    Laura Conforti;Jonathan Gilley;Michael P. Coleman

  • dSarm/Sarm1 Is Required for Activation of an Injury-Induced Axon Death Pathway

    Jeannette M. Osterloh;Jing Yang;Timothy M. Rooney;A. Nicole Fox

  • Wallerian degeneration of injured axons and synapses is delayed by a Ube4b/Nmnat chimeric gene.

    T G Mack;M Reiner;B Beirowski;W Mi

  • Endogenous Nmnat2 Is an Essential Survival Factor for Maintenance of Healthy Axons

    Jonathan Gilley;Michael P. Coleman

  • Axon pathology in neurological disease: a neglected therapeutic target.

    Michael P Coleman;V.Hugh Perry

  • Wallerian Degeneration, WldS, and Nmnat

    Michael P. Coleman;Marc R. Freeman

  • NAD+ cleavage activity by animal and plant TIR domains in cell death pathways

    Shane Horsefield;Hayden Burdett;Xiaoxiao Zhang;Xiaoxiao Zhang;Mohammad K. Manik

  • The progressive nature of Wallerian degeneration in wild-type and slow Wallerian degeneration (WldS) nerves

    Bogdan Beirowski;Robert Adalbert;Robert Adalbert;Diana Wagner;Daniela S Grumme

  • Traumatic Axonal Injury: Mechanisms and Translational Opportunities

    Ciaran S. Hill;Michael P. Coleman;David K. Menon

  • Inhibiting axon degeneration and synapse loss attenuates apoptosis and disease progression in a mouse model of motoneuron disease.

    Anna Ferri;Joshua R. Sanes;Michael P. Coleman;Jeanette M. Cunningham

  • TDP-43 gains function due to perturbed autoregulation in a Tardbp knock-in mouse model of ALS-FTD.

    Matthew A. White;Matthew A. White;Eosu Kim;Eosu Kim;Amanda Duffy;Robert Adalbert

  • Programmed axon degeneration: from mouse to mechanism to medicine.

    Michael P. Coleman;Ahmet Höke

  • The Wlds mutation delays robust loss of motor and sensory axons in a genetic model for myelin-related axonopathy.

    Mohtashem Samsam;Weiqian Mi;Carsten Wessig;Jürgen Zielasek

  • Review: Axon pathology in age-related neurodegenerative disorders.

    R. Adalbert;M. P. Coleman

  • An 85-kb tandem triplication in the slow Wallerian degeneration (Wlds) mouse.

    Unknown

  • Neuronal death: where does the end begin?

    Laura Conforti;Robert Adalbert;Michael P. Coleman

  • Severely dystrophic axons at amyloid plaques remain continuous and connected to viable cell bodies

    Robert Adalbert;Antal Nogradi;Elisabetta Babetto;Lucie Janeckova

  • Mitochondria as a central sensor for axonal degenerative stimuli

    Felipe A. Court;Michael P. Coleman

  • Autophagy in axonal and dendritic degeneration

    Yi Yang;Yi Yang;Michael Coleman;Lihui Zhang;Xiaoxiang Zheng

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard R. Ribchester
Richard R. Ribchester University of Edinburgh
Bostjan Kobe
Bostjan Kobe University of Queensland
Brian J. Staskawicz
Brian J. Staskawicz University of California, Berkeley
Ian B. Dry
Ian B. Dry Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
John P. Rathjen
John P. Rathjen Australian National University
Peter N. Dodds
Peter N. Dodds Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Thomas H. Gillingwater
Thomas H. Gillingwater University of Edinburgh
Klaus Addicks
Klaus Addicks University of Cologne
Timothy J. Bussey
Timothy J. Bussey University of Western Ontario
Simon Andrews
Simon Andrews Babraham Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in neuroscience opens doors to a range of related fields and online degree options in the USA. Many students interested in neuroscience explore psychology, social work, and behavior analysis, all of which are in high demand and offer strong career outlooks.

Those looking for flexibility and affordability may consider programs such as the cheapest msw programs and cheapest bcba online program. These programs prepare graduates for roles in mental health and behavioral support, areas that closely intersect with neuroscience principles.

If you’re interested in quicker pathways to advanced careers, there are accelerated online msw programs and accelerated psychology degree programs that allow you to complete your education faster. These fast-track degrees can reduce both study time and tuition costs, helping you enter the workforce sooner.

As neuroscience continues to drive innovation in healthcare and research, exploring these related online degree options can equip you with diverse skills and create multiple career pathways in both clinical and research environments.

Best Scientists Citing Michael P. Coleman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles