World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8447 7888 4519 4114 93 8723

Andrei Cimpian publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrei Cimpian between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrei Cimpian published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2024. 35 of the 163 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2024. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 17 publications
2005 2025

163 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrei Cimpian: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 1
2008 1
2009 1
2010 4
2011 2
2012 6
2013 0
2014 7
2015 11
2016 10
2017 15
2018 9
2019 9
2020 15
2021 10
2022 10
2023 16
2024 18
2025 17
Total 163
Download as CSV

Andrei Cimpian publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrei Cimpian sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 93 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 93
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrei Cimpian D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrei Cimpian sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrei Cimpian is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on social sciences and psychology, with a significant emphasis on gender studies, experimental and cognitive psychology, education, social psychology, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's work addresses a range of topics, including education, achievement, and giftedness; social and intergroup psychology; early childhood education and development; gender roles and identity studies; gender diversity and inequality; grit, self-efficacy, and motivation; and career development and diversity.

Recent notable publications by Andrei Cimpian include:

  • Teacher Mindsets Help Explain Where a Growth-Mindset Intervention Does and Doesn't Work (2021, Psychological Science)
  • Which role models are effective for which students? A systematic review and four recommendations for maximizing the effectiveness of role models in STEM (2021, International Journal of STEM Education)
  • Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results (2020, Psychological Bulletin)
  • Adults and children implicitly associate brilliance with men more than women (2020, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology)
  • Women-particularly underrepresented minority women-and early-career academics feel like impostors in fields that value brilliance (2021, Journal of Educational Psychology)

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as Developmental Psychology, SSRN Electronic Journal, Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature, Psychological Science, and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

Andrei Cimpian collaborates regularly with several coauthors, including Melis Muradoglu, Sébastien Goudeau, April H. Bailey, Tenelle Porter, and Sophie H. Arnold.

Best Publications

  • Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines

    Sarah Jane Leslie;Andrei Cimpian;Meredith Meyer;Edward Freeland

  • Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests

    Lin-Gen Bian;Lin-Gen Bian;Sarah-Jane Leslie;Andrei Cimpian;Andrei Cimpian

  • Subtle Linguistic Cues Affect Children's Motivation

    Andrei Cimpian;Holly Marie C. Arce;Ellen M. Markman;Carol S. Dweck

  • The inherence heuristic: An intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism

    Andrei Cimpian;Erika Salomon

  • Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance.

    Meredith Meyer;Andrei Cimpian;Sarah Jane Leslie

  • Generic Statements Require Little Evidence for Acceptance but Have Powerful Implications

    Andrei Cimpian;Amanda C. Brandone;Susan A. Gelman

  • Messages about brilliance undermine women's interest in educational and professional opportunities

    Lin Bian;Sarah Jane Leslie;Mary C. Murphy;Andrei Cimpian

  • Information learned from generic language becomes central to children's biological concepts: Evidence from their open-ended explanations

    Andrei Cimpian;Ellen M. Markman

  • Crowdsourcing hypothesis tests: Making transparent how design choices shape research results

    Justin F Landy;Miaolei Liam Jia;Isabel L Ding;Domenico Viganola

  • The Generic/Nongeneric Distinction Influences How Children Interpret New Information About Social Others

    Andrei Cimpian;Ellen M. Markman

  • An early-emerging explanatory heuristic promotes support for the status quo.

    Larisa J. Hussak;Andrei Cimpian

  • The pipeline project : Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline

    Martin Schweinsberg;Nikhil Madan;Michelangelo Vianello;S. Amy Sommer

  • Evidence of bias against girls and women in contexts that emphasize intellectual ability.

    Lin Bian;Sarah Jane Leslie;Andrei Cimpian

  • How does social essentialism affect the development of inter-group relations?

    Marjorie Rhodes;Sarah Jane Leslie;Katya Saunders;Yarrow Dunham

  • Preschool children's use of cues to generic meaning

    Andrei Cimpian;Ellen M. Markman

  • Adults and children implicitly associate brilliance with men more than women

    Daniel Storage;Tessa E.S. Charlesworth;Mahzarin R. Banaji;Andrei Cimpian

  • Who Is Good at This Game? Linking an Activity to a Social Category Undermines Children’s Achievement

    Andrei Cimpian;Yan Mu;Lucy C. Erickson

  • The impact of generic language about ability on children's achievement motivation.

    Andrei Cimpian

  • Women—particularly underrepresented minority women—and early-career academics feel like impostors in fields that value brilliance.

    Melis Muradoglu;Zachary Horne;Matthew D. Hammond;Sarah-Jane Leslie

  • Why Do People Tend to Infer “Ought” From “Is”? The Role of Biases in Explanation:

    Christina M. Tworek;Andrei Cimpian

  • Inherence heuristic versus essentialism: Issues of antecedence and cognitive mechanism

    Vincent Y. Yzerbyt;Stéphanie Demoulin

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah-Jane Leslie
Sarah-Jane Leslie Princeton University
Jay J. Van Bavel
Jay J. Van Bavel New York University
Susan A. Gelman
Susan A. Gelman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alexander Ly
Alexander Ly Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica
Ellen M. Markman
Ellen M. Markman Stanford University
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam
Peter H. Ditto
Peter H. Ditto University of California, Irvine
Sapna Cheryan
Sapna Cheryan University of Washington
Daniel C. Molden
Daniel C. Molden Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open diverse career pathways, including specializations like behavior analysis. One popular option is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a role in high demand across the United States. While the BCBA career requires a graduate degree and supervised experience, online psychology programs often provide flexible routes to meet these requirements.

The process can differ depending on location, as demonstrated by region-specific guides such as becoming a bcba in Corpus Christi and how to become a bcba in Dallas. Each area may have unique education opportunities and approved supervision options. Similar criteria are covered in resources about Denver bcba education requirements and Detroit bcba requirements, highlighting the importance of understanding local licensure laws and available training routes.

Choosing the right online degree not only impacts your BCBA eligibility but can also support other careers in mental health, counseling, and social services. Carefully review your target state’s or city’s standards to ensure your education aligns with your long-term goals.

Best Scientists Citing Andrei Cimpian

Trending Scientists