World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
67
Citations
15782
World Ranking
1230
National Ranking
127

Tim J. Wright publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim J. Wright sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 253 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Tim J. Wright D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tim J. Wright sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tim J. Wright is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily within Earth and Planetary Sciences and Engineering. They have contributed extensively to the fields of geophysics, aerospace engineering, and related subfields including management, monitoring, policy and law, atmospheric science, and mechanics of materials.

Their work covers a wide range of topics such as earthquake and tectonic studies, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) applications and techniques, landslides and related hazards, geological and geochemical analysis, high-pressure geophysics and materials, earthquake detection and analysis, and cryospheric studies and observations.

Tim J. Wright has published numerous scientific papers, including notable recent works such as:

  • LiCSBAS: An Open-Source InSAR Time Series Analysis Package Integrated with the LiCSAR Automated Sentinel-1 InSAR Processor, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • LiCSAR: An Automatic InSAR Tool for Measuring and Monitoring Tectonic and Volcanic Activity, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • High-Resolution Surface Velocities and Strain for Anatolia From Sentinel-1 InSAR and GNSS Data, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • How satellite InSAR has grown from opportunistic science to routine monitoring over the last decade, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Unexpected large eruptions from buoyant magma bodies within viscoelastic crust, 2020, Nature Communications

The frequent co-authors with whom they have collaborated include Andrew Hooper, John R. Elliott, Milan Lazecký, Yasser Maghsoudi, and T. J. Craig. These collaborations have been reflected in the broad scope and depth of their research outputs.

Their publications have appeared in a variety of scientific venues, with multiple contributions to the Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, Geophysical Research Letters, Nature Communications, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Remote Sensing.

Best Publications

  • Toward mapping surface deformation in three dimensions using InSAR

    Tim J. Wright;Barry E. Parsons;Zhong Lu

  • Complex multifault rupture during the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake, New Zealand

    Ian J. Hamling;Sigrún Hreinsdóttir;Kate Clark;John Elliott

  • Magma-maintained rift segmentation at continental rupture in the 2005 Afar dyking episode

    Tim J. Wright;Tim J. Wright;Cindy Ebinger;Cindy Ebinger;Juliet Biggs;Atalay Ayele

  • Crustal Deformation in the India‐Eurasia Collision Zone From 25 Years of GPS Measurements

    Gang Zheng;Hua Wang;Hua Wang;Tim J. Wright;Yidong Lou

  • Statistical comparison of InSAR tropospheric correction techniques

    D.P.S. Bekaert;R.J. Walters;T.J. Wright;A.J. Hooper

  • Multi-interferogram method for measuring interseismic deformation: Denali Fault, Alaska

    Juliet Biggs;Tim Wright;Zhong Lu;Barry Parsons

  • Surface displacements and source parameters of the 2003 Bam (Iran) earthquake from Envisat advanced synthetic aperture radar imagery

    Gareth J. Funning;Gareth J. Funning;Barry Parsons;Tim J. Wright;James A. Jackson

  • InSAR observations of low slip rates on the major faults of western Tibet.

    Tim J. Wright;Barry Parsons;Philip C. England;Eric J. Fielding

  • LiCSBAS: An Open-Source InSAR Time Series Analysis Package Integrated with the LiCSAR Automated Sentinel-1 InSAR Processor

    Yu Morishita;Milan Lazecky;Tim J. Wright;Jonathan R. Weiss

  • InSAR slip rate determination on the Altyn Tagh Fault, northern Tibet, in the presence of topographically correlated atmospheric delays

    J.R. Elliott;Juliet Biggs;Juliet Biggs;B. Parsons;T.J. Wright

  • Geophysical constraints on the dynamics of spreading centres from rifting episodes on land

    Tim J. Wright;Freysteinn Sigmundsson;Carolina Pagli;Manahloh Belachew

  • The role of space-based observation in understanding and responding to active tectonics and earthquakes

    J.R. Elliott;J.R. Elliott;R.J. Walters;R.J. Walters;T.J. Wright

  • A spatially variable power law tropospheric correction technique for InSAR data

    D. P. S. Bekaert;D. P. S. Bekaert;A. Hooper;A. Hooper;T. J. Wright

  • The 2003 Bam (Iran) earthquake: Rupture of a blind strike-slip fault

    Morteza Talebian;Eric J. Fielding;Eric J. Fielding;Gareth J. Funning;Manoucher Ghorashi

  • Measurement of interseismic strain accumulation across the North Anatolian Fault by satellite radar interferometry

    Tim Wright;Barry Parsons;Eric Fielding

  • LiCSAR: An Automatic InSAR Tool for Measuring and Monitoring Tectonic and Volcanic Activity

    Milan Lazecký;Karsten Spaans;Pablo J. González;Yasser Maghsoudi

  • Source model for the Mw 6.7, 23 October 2002, Nenana Mountain Earthquake (Alaska) from InSAR

    Tim J. Wright;Zhong Lu;Charles W. Wicks

  • Post-seismic motion following the 1997 Manyi (Tibet) earthquake: InSAR observations and modelling

    Isabelle Ryder;Barry Parsons;Tim J. Wright;Gareth J. Funning

  • Source parameters of the 1 October 1995 Dinar (Turkey) earthquake from SAR interferometry and seismic bodywave modelling

    T.J. Wright;B.E. Parsons;J.A. Jackson;M. Haynes

  • High‐resolution surface velocities and strain for Anatolia from Sentinel‐1 InSAR and GNSS data.

    Jonathan R. Weiss;Jonathan R. Weiss;Richard J. Walters;Yu Morishita;Yu Morishita;Tim J. Wright

  • Displacement field and slip distribution of the 2005 Kashmir earthquake from SAR imagery

    E. Pathier;E. J. Fielding;T. J. Wright;R. Walker

  • Length and Timescales of Rift Faulting and Magma Intrusion: The Afar Rifting Cycle from 2005 to Present

    Cynthia Ebinger;Atalay Ayele;Derek Keir;Julie Rowland

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew Hooper
Andrew Hooper University of Leeds
Barry Parsons
Barry Parsons University of Oxford
Derek Keir
Derek Keir University of Florence
Juliet Biggs
Juliet Biggs University of Bristol
Atalay Ayele
Atalay Ayele Addis Ababa University
Eric Calais
Eric Calais École Normale Supérieure
Pablo J. González
Pablo J. González Spanish National Research Council
Cynthia J. Ebinger
Cynthia J. Ebinger Tulane University
Eric J. Fielding
Eric J. Fielding Jet Propulsion Lab
James O.S. Hammond
James O.S. Hammond Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary fields and career options. Many students complement their studies with degrees that enhance research, communication, and technical skills. For instance, a library degree can be valuable for managing scientific data and research archives, a crucial aspect of environmental and geological research.

For those interested in visual documentation and environmental impact studies, pursuing photography through accredited photography colleges online offers opportunities to develop skills in capturing natural phenomena and communicating scientific findings visually.

Veterans looking to enhance their skills can find supportive programs tailored to their needs, such as veteran friendly online photography degree options. These programs facilitate a smooth transition into civilian careers linked to Earth Science, including environmental consulting and scientific documentation.

Language skills are also beneficial in global scientific collaboration. An spanish degree online can enhance communication with Spanish-speaking communities and researchers, broadening career prospects in international environmental policy and research.

Best Scientists Citing Tim J. Wright

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles