World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 87 1095 962 51 42 383 26300

Kang Lee publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kang Lee between 1969 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kang Lee published across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2013. 16 of the 441 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2013. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 39 publications 2014: 39 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 7 publications
1969 2025

441 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kang Lee: publications per year, 1969 to 2025
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 2
1997 5
1998 4
1999 2
2000 6
2001 4
2002 6
2003 5
2004 6
2005 3
2006 7
2007 12
2008 17
2009 21
2010 27
2011 26
2012 17
2013 39
2014 39
2015 24
2016 15
2017 28
2018 21
2019 20
2020 18
2021 22
2022 16
2023 12
2024 9
2025 7
Total 441
Download as CSV

Kang Lee publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kang Lee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–390 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 383 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58 383
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kang Lee D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kang Lee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101 87
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kang Lee is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and conducts research primarily in the field of Psychology. Their work spans several subfields including Safety Research, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their research covers a variety of topics, notably academic integrity and plagiarism, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, deception detection and forensic psychology, child and animal learning development, non-invasive vital sign monitoring, social and intergroup psychology, and face recognition and perception.

Frequent publication venues for Kang Lee include the Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, where they have published 14 papers, Developmental Science with 5 papers, IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine with 5 papers, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing with 4 papers, and Developmental Psychology with 3 papers.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Academic dishonesty and its relations to peer cheating and culture: A meta-analysis of the perceived peer cheating effect, 2022, Educational Research Review
  • Theory of mind, executive function, and lying in children: a meta-analysis, 2021, Developmental Science
  • Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learning, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Accuracy of pulse oximeters in measuring oxygen saturation in patients with poor peripheral perfusion: a systematic review, 2022, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
  • The development of social comparisons and sharing behavior across 12 countries, 2020, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Kang Lee has collaborated frequently with researchers such as Li Zhao, Gail D. Heyman, Brian J. Compton, Genyue Fu, and Haiying Mao.

Best Publications

  • The Development of Executive Functioning and Theory of Mind A Comparison of Chinese and U.S. Preschoolers

    Mark A. Sabbagh;Fen Xu;Stephanie M. Carlson;Louis J. Moses

  • The Other-Race Effect Develops During Infancy Evidence of Perceptual Narrowing

    David J. Kelly;Paul C. Quinn;Alan M. Slater;Kang Lee

  • Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces

    David J. Kelly;Paul C. Quinn;Alan M. Slater;Kang Lee

  • The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence

    Alejo Freire;Kang Lee;Lawrence A Symons

  • Effects of Experience on Fetal Voice Recognition

    Barbara S. Kisilevsky;Sylvia M.J. Hains;Kang Lee;Xing Xie

  • Social and Cognitive Correlates of Children’s Lying Behavior

    Victoria Talwar;Kang Lee

  • Development of lying to conceal a transgression: Children’s control of expressive behaviour during verbal deception

    Victoria Talwar;Kang Lee

  • Lying in the elementary school years : Verbal deception and its relation to second-order belief understanding

    Victoria Talwar;Heidi M. Gordon;Kang Lee

  • Fetal sensitivity to properties of maternal speech and language.

    B.S. Kisilevsky;S.M.J. Hains;C.A. Brown;C.T. Lee

  • Development of the other-race effect during infancy: Evidence toward universality?

    David J. Kelly;Shaoying Liu;Kang Lee;Paul C. Quinn

  • Emergence of Lying in Very Young Children

    Angela D. Evans;Kang Lee

  • White lie-telling in children for politeness purposes

    Victoria Talwar;Susan M. Murphy;Kang Lee

  • Little Liars: Development of Verbal Deception in Children.

    Kang Lee

  • Do young children always say yes to yes-no questions? A metadevelopmental study of the affirmation bias

    V. Heather Fritzley;Kang Lee

  • Cross-Race Preferences for Same-Race Faces Extend Beyond the African Versus Caucasian Contrast in 3-Month-Old Infants.

    David J. Kelly;Shaoying Liu;Liezhong Ge;Paul C. Quinn

  • Children's Conceptual Knowledge of Lying and its Relation to Their Actual Behaviors: Implications for Court Competence Examinations

    Victoria Talwar;Kang Lee;Nicholas Bala;R. C. L. Lindsay

  • Seeing Jesus in toast: neural and behavioral correlates of face pareidolia.

    Jiangang Liu;Jun Li;Lu Feng;Ling Li

  • Emergence of White-Lie Telling in Children Between 3 and 7 Years of Age

    Victoria Talwar;Kang Lee

  • Automatic coding of facial expressions displayed during posed and genuine pain

    Gwen C. Littlewort;Marian Stewart Bartlett;Kang Lee

  • Children's Lie-Telling to Conceal a Parent's Transgression: Legal Implications

    Victoria Talwar;Kang Lee;Nicholas Bala;R. C. L. Lindsay

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul C. Quinn
Paul C. Quinn University of Delaware
Gail D. Heyman
Gail D. Heyman University of California, San Diego
Olivier Pascalis
Olivier Pascalis Grenoble Alpes University
Alan Slater
Alan Slater University of Exeter
Jie Tian
Jie Tian Chinese Academy of Sciences
Victoria Talwar
Victoria Talwar McGill University
James W. Tanaka
James W. Tanaka University of Victoria
Shoji Itakura
Shoji Itakura Kyoto University
David J. Kelly
David J. Kelly University of Sheffield
Darwin W. Muir
Darwin W. Muir Queen's University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Psychology offers a wide range of opportunities, especially through online degrees that allow for flexible learning. Many students use online programs as a pathway to becoming a licensed professional, such as a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT).

The journey to becoming an MFT varies by location. For instance, if you're interested in learning how to become an mft in Austin, you'll need to meet specific local educational and licensing requirements. Similarly, understanding Bakersfield mft education requirements is crucial for those pursuing this career in California.

Each state has unique prerequisites. Students curious about how to become a marriage and family therapist in Baltimore or those wanting to know how to become an mft in Boise will find that completing an accredited degree is just the beginning. Supervised clinical experience and passing relevant exams are important steps along these career pathways.

Ultimately, researching degree and state licensing requirements ensures that your online education aligns with your career goals in Psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Kang Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles