World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
18725
World Ranking
3647
National Ranking
2049

Ellen M. Markman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellen M. Markman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 110 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ellen M. Markman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ellen M. Markman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ellen M. Markman is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research spans various domains within the social sciences, with a notable focus on how social and cognitive processes intersect in human development and communication.

The scientist's recent publications reflect studies conducted across several topics and disciplines. These publications include:

  • "Just as good": Learning gender stereotypes from attempts to counteract them. (2020, Developmental Psychology)
  • What should we eat for breakfast? American and Chinese children's prescriptive judgments about breakfast foods. (2020, Cognitive Development)
  • Modeling and leveraging intuitive theories to improve vaccine attitudes. (2023, Journal of Experimental Psychology General)
  • When intents to educate can misinform: Inadvertent paltering through violations of communicative norms. (2020, PLoS ONE)
  • Gender Categories as Dual-Character Concepts? (2021, Cognitive Science)

The primary fields of study for Ellen M. Markman are within the social sciences. Subfields of their work include:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Gender Studies
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

The main topics addressed in their research cover diverse areas, incorporating psychological and sociocultural themes such as:

  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Culinary Culture and Tourism
  • Child and Animal Learning Development

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Cognitive Development
  • Child Development Perspectives
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • PLoS ONE

Ellen M. Markman has collaborated with several researchers multiple times. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Lin Bian
  • Marianna Y. Zhang
  • Julie Sullivan
  • Derek Powell
  • Eleanor K. Chestnut

The scope of Ellen M. Markman's work integrates cognitive and social psychological perspectives, focusing on how people acquire, process, and transmit socially relevant knowledge, including attitudes toward gender, education, and misinformation. Their research contributes to understanding developmental and social mechanisms in both individual and cultural contexts.

Best Publications

  • Categories and induction in young children

    Susan A. Gelman;Ellen M. Markman

  • Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words ☆

    Ellen M Markman;Gwyn F Wachtel

  • Categorization and Naming in Children: Problems of Induction

    Ellen M. Markman

  • Children's sensitivity to constraints on word meaning: taxonomic versus thematic relations

    Ellen M. Markman;Jean E. Hutchinson

  • Constraints Children Place on Word Meanings

    Ellen M. Markman

  • Young children's inductions from natural kinds: the role of categories and appearances.

    Susan A. Gelman;Ellen M. Markman

  • Realizing that you don't understand: elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies.

    Ellen M. Markman

  • When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth

    Cynthia Fisher;D.Geoffrey Hall;Susan Rakowitz;Lila Gleitman

  • Subtle Linguistic Cues Affect Children's Motivation

    Andrei Cimpian;Holly Marie C. Arce;Ellen M. Markman;Carol S. Dweck

  • Realizing That You Don't Understand: A Preliminary Investigation.

    Ellen M. Markman

  • Infants' Reliance on a Social Criterion for Establishing Word‐Object Relations

    Dare A. Baldwin;Ellen M. Markman;Brigitte Bill;Renee N. Desjardins

  • Rapid Word Learning in 13- and 18-Month-Olds.

    Amanda L. Woodward;Ellen M. Markman;Colleen M. Fitzsimmons

  • Word Learning in Children: An Examination of Fast Mapping.

    Tracy H. Heibeck;Ellen M. Markman

  • Categorization and Naming in Children

    Unknown

  • Use of the mutual exclusivity assumption by young word learners.

    Ellen M Markman;Judith L Wasow;Mikkel B Hansen

  • Establishing word-object relations: a first step.

    Dare A. Baldwin;Ellen M. Markman

  • Infants' Ability to Draw Inferences about Nonobvious Object Properties: Evidence from Exploratory Play.

    Dare A. Baldwin;Ellen M. Markman;Riikka L. Melartin

  • Early Word Learning

    Ellen M. Markman

  • Perspectives on language and thought: The whole-object, taxonomic, and mutual exclusivity assumptions as initial constraints on word meanings

    Ellen M. Markman

  • Constraints on word learning: Speculations about their nature, origins, and domain specificity.

    Ellen M. Markman

  • The essential Piaget

    Ellen Markman

Frequent Co-Authors

Carol S. Dweck
Carol S. Dweck Stanford University
Andrei Cimpian
Andrei Cimpian New York University
Dare A. Baldwin
Dare A. Baldwin University of Oregon
Jonathan Winawer
Jonathan Winawer New York University
Susan A. Gelman
Susan A. Gelman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Susan Carey
Susan Carey Harvard University
Terry Kit-fong Au
Terry Kit-fong Au University of Hong Kong
Amanda L. Woodward
Amanda L. Woodward University of Chicago
Elizabeth S. Spelke
Elizabeth S. Spelke Harvard University
Michael C. Frank
Michael C. Frank Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens doors to a range of online degree options and diverse career pathways, many of which overlap with social work. Online bachelor’s and master’s degrees in psychology or social work can prepare you for rewarding roles in healthcare, education, and community organizations.

If you’re considering a career as a social worker, keep in mind that each state has unique licensing requirements. For example, those interested in practicing in Georgia should review the Georgia social work license requirements to understand specific educational and training prerequisites. Likewise, if Hawaii is your goal, be sure to check the Hawaii social work license requirements.

Interested in working in Idaho? Learn about becoming a social worker in Idaho, which highlights state-specific steps for licensure. If you plan to pursue a career in Illinois, you’ll want to familiarize yourself with the Illinois social work education requirements.

Researching these resources and selecting the right online psychology or social work program will help you meet state requirements and set yourself up for a meaningful career.

Best Scientists Citing Ellen M. Markman

Trending Scientists