What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
- Linguistics
- Artificial intelligence
- Cognitive psychology
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Linguistics, Cognitive psychology, Prosody, Reading comprehension and Comprehension.
In general Linguistics study, her work on Reading skills often relates to the realm of Facilitation, thereby connecting several areas of interest.
Her Cognitive psychology study combines topics in areas such as Sentence, Context and Metacognition.
The Prosody study combines topics in areas such as Fluency and Reading.
In the subject of general Reading, her work in Verbal comprehension is often linked to Expression, thereby combining diverse domains of study.
Her studies in Comprehension integrate themes in fields like Word use, Word, Meaning, Word meaning and Instrumentalism.
Her most cited work include:
- Differential Context Effects in the Comprehension of Abstract and Concrete Verbal Materials (371 citations)
- Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words (296 citations)
- Aligning Theory and Assessment of Reading Fluency: Automaticity, Prosody, and Definitions of Fluency (289 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Linguistics, Reading, Cognitive psychology, Developmental psychology and Fluency are her primary areas of study.
Word recognition, Sentence, Context, Vocabulary and Reading skills are the core of her Linguistics study.
Paula J. Schwanenflugel studies Reading comprehension, a branch of Reading.
Her research in the fields of Similarity, Concreteness and Recall overlaps with other disciplines such as Constructive.
Her Developmental psychology research incorporates themes from Cognitive development, Metacognition, Categorization and Primary education.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Prosody and Comprehension in addition to Fluency.
She most often published in these fields:
- Linguistics (40.59%)
- Reading (30.69%)
- Cognitive psychology (29.70%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2010-2021)?
- Reading (30.69%)
- Fluency (19.80%)
- Prosody (13.86%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Paula J. Schwanenflugel focuses on Reading, Fluency, Prosody, Linguistics and Cognitive psychology.
Her Reading research includes themes of Active listening, Natural language processing, Developmental psychology, Artificial intelligence and Psycholinguistics.
The various areas that Paula J. Schwanenflugel examines in her Fluency study include Sentence, Sight word and Context.
As part of her studies on Linguistics, Paula J. Schwanenflugel frequently links adjacent subjects like Humanities.
Her Cognitive psychology research incorporates elements of Theory of mind, Suprasegmentals and Comprehension.
Her work deals with themes such as Lexical diversity, Vocabulary, Language development and Reading comprehension, which intersect with Comprehension.
Between 2010 and 2021, her most popular works were:
- Why are Abstract Concepts Hard to Understand (170 citations)
- The Longitudinal Relationship between Reading Fluency and Reading Comprehension Skills in Second-Grade Children. (27 citations)
- Reading fluency skill and the prosodic marking of linguistic focus (26 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Linguistics
- Artificial intelligence
- Developmental psychology
Her primary areas of study are Reading, Fluency, Cognitive psychology, Linguistics and Prosody.
Her research in Cognitive psychology intersects with topics in Developmental psychology, Prosocial behavior, Inference and Comprehension.
Her Comprehension research includes elements of Reciprocal, Reading comprehension, Reciprocal teaching, Social cognition and Theory of mind.
Her Linguistics study often links to related topics such as Humanities.
Paula J. Schwanenflugel has researched Prosody in several fields, including Context, Sentence, Sight word, Intonation and Automaticity.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
