World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paula J. Schwanenflugel

Paula J. Schwanenflugel

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
10911
World Ranking
6104
National Ranking
3320

Paula J. Schwanenflugel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paula J. Schwanenflugel sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Paula J. Schwanenflugel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paula J. Schwanenflugel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paula J. Schwanenflugel is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their academic profile presents an emphasis on research and scholarship linked to this institution.

Information on specific research topics, fields of study, or subfields and topics within their scientific work is not provided in the available data.

Their publication record does not include any recent papers, and there are no listed frequent co-authors or preferred publication venues connected to their work.

Similarly, there is no information about book publications or awards associated with Paula J. Schwanenflugel, nor details on citations or notable recognitions.

The profile depicts a scientist whose academic and research footprint is centered around their appointment at the University of Georgia, with limited publicly available details on their scholarly contributions or collaborations.

Best Publications

  • Aligning Theory and Assessment of Reading Fluency: Automaticity, Prosody, and Definitions of Fluency

    Melanie R. Kuhn;Paula J. Schwanenflugel;Elizabeth B. Meisinger

  • Differential Context Effects in the Comprehension of Abstract and Concrete Verbal Materials

    Paula J. Schwanenflugel;Edward J. Shoben

  • Becoming a Fluent Reader: Reading Skill and Prosodic Features in the Oral Reading of Young Readers.

    Paula J. Schwanenflugel;Anne Marie Hamilton;Melanie R. Kuhn;Joseph M. Wisenbaker

  • Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words

    Paula J Schwanenflugel;Katherine Kip Harnishfeger;Randall W Stowe

  • Development of Metacognition in Gifted Children: Directions for Future Research

    Joyce M. Alexander;Martha Carr;Paula J. Schwanenflugel

  • A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Reading Prosody as a Dimension of Oral Reading Fluency in Early Elementary School Children

    Justin Miller;Paula J. Schwanenflugel

  • The psychology of word meanings

    Paula J. Schwanenflugel

  • Prosody of Syntactically Complex Sentences in the Oral Reading of Young Children.

    Justin S. Miller;Paula J. Schwanenflugel

  • Becoming a fluent and automatic reader in the early elementary school years.

    Paula J. Schwanenflugel;Elizabeth B. Meisinger;Joseph M. Wisenbaker;Melanie R. Kuhn

  • Linear separability in classification learning.

    Douglas L. Medin;Paula J. Schwanenflugel

  • Teaching Children to Become Fluent and Automatic Readers.

    Melanie R. Kuhn;Paula J. Schwanenflugel;Robin D. Morris;Lesley Mandel Morrow

  • Relationship between Lexical Competence and Language Proficiency: Variable Sensitivity.

    Alla Zareva;Paula Schwanenflugel;Yordanka Nikolova

  • The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words.

    Paula J Schwanenflugel;Edward J Shoben

  • Why are Abstract Concepts Hard to Understand

    Paula J. Schwanenflugel

  • Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words

    Paula J. Schwanenflugel;Carolyn Akin;Wei-Ming Luh

  • Semantic relatedness and the scope of facilitation for upcoming words in sentences.

    Paula J. Schwanenflugel;Kathy L. LaCount

  • Text Complexity and Oral Reading Prosody in Young Readers

    Rebekah George Benjamin;Paula J. Schwanenflugel

  • Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words in sentences.

    Paula J. Schwanenflugel;Randall W. Stowe

  • Interlingual semantic facilitation: Evidence for a common representational system in the bilingual lexicon

    Paula J Schwanenflugel;Mario Rey

  • The Relationship between Different Measures of Oral Reading Fluency and Reading Comprehension in Second-Grade Students Who Evidence Different Oral Reading Fluency Difficulties.

    Justin C. Wise;Rose A. Sevcik;Robin D. Morris;Maureen W. Lovett

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin G. Morris
Robin G. Morris King's College London
Steven A. Stahl
Steven A. Stahl University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lesley Mandel Morrow
Lesley Mandel Morrow Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Wayne H. Ward
Wayne H. Ward University of Colorado Boulder
Gerald Tindal
Gerald Tindal University of Oregon
Rose A. Sevcik
Rose A. Sevcik Georgia State University
Gregory P. Strauss
Gregory P. Strauss University of Georgia
Randy W. Kamphaus
Randy W. Kamphaus University of Oregon
Mike Martin
Mike Martin University of Zurich
Maureen W. Lovett
Maureen W. Lovett University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens up numerous opportunities, especially with the growing demand for mental health professionals in the USA. Online psychology degrees offer the flexibility to pursue this rewarding field, whether you’re just starting out or looking to specialize further.

One of the most common pathways is becoming a licensed therapist, which typically requires a graduate degree along with state-specific licensure. For example, you can find detailed guidance on becoming a licensed therapist in Aurora or explore the licensed therapist requirements in Austin. These resources outline essential steps such as supervised clinical hours, exams, and ongoing professional development.

The specific requirements can vary significantly by location. For instance, standards for becoming a licensed therapist in Bakersfield or the licensed therapist requirements in Baltimore may differ based on local regulations and licensure boards.

Regardless of your chosen pathway, online psychology programs can help you meet educational prerequisites and prepare for a variety of fulfilling roles in counseling, therapy, and mental health advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Paula J. Schwanenflugel

Trending Scientists