World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
20956
World Ranking
4106
National Ranking
184

Manfred Schmitt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manfred Schmitt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 228 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Manfred Schmitt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manfred Schmitt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Social psychology
  • Statistics
  • Social science

Manfred Schmitt spends much of his time researching Social psychology, Injustice, Personality, Big Five personality traits and Anger. His Social psychology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Empirical evidence and Cognition. His Injustice research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Punishment, Mental health, Social environment and Perception.

His Personality study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Affect, Social perception, Regression and Normative. While the research belongs to areas of Anger, Manfred Schmitt spends his time largely on the problem of Intrusiveness, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Construct validity, Disappointment and Life satisfaction. His study explores the link between Moderation and topics such as Implicit attitude that cross with problems in Self-report study, Association, Implicit-association test and Situational ethics.

His most cited work include:

  • A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures (1167 citations)
  • Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study (1148 citations)
  • Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (479 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Social psychology, Injustice, Personality, Humanities and Justice are his primary areas of study. His study brings together the fields of Cognition and Social psychology. His studies in Injustice integrate themes in fields like Construct validity, Just-world hypothesis and Intrusiveness.

His Personality study combines topics in areas such as Developmental psychology, Test validity and Cognitive psychology. His Justice study typically links adjacent topics like Well-being. In most of his Implicit-association test studies, his work intersects topics such as Implicit attitude.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Social psychology (52.15%)
  • Injustice (14.83%)
  • Personality (12.44%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Social psychology (52.15%)
  • Cognitive psychology (9.09%)
  • Justice (9.57%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Social psychology, Cognitive psychology, Justice, Injustice and Process. He performs multidisciplinary study in Social psychology and Trait in his work. His work carried out in the field of Cognitive psychology brings together such families of science as Task, Jealousy, Aggression and Personality.

His work on Personality development, Big Five personality traits and Agreeableness is typically connected to Research questions as part of general Personality study, connecting several disciplines of science. In his research, Longitudinal study and Pedagogy is intimately related to Well-being, which falls under the overarching field of Justice. His biological study deals with issues like Dictator game, which deal with fields such as Mindset, Schema and Expectancy theory.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Integrating Personality Structure, Personality Process, and Personality Development: (144 citations)
  • Self-esteem development across the life span: a longitudinal study with a large sample from Germany. (68 citations)
  • Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (52 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Social psychology
  • Social science
  • Statistics

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Social psychology, Cognitive psychology, Anger, Longitudinal study and Current. He has researched Social psychology in several fields, including Psychological intervention and Causality. Manfred Schmitt interconnects Empirical evidence, Jealousy and Aggression in the investigation of issues within Cognitive psychology.

His work deals with themes such as Privilege, Justice, Feeling and Injustice, which intersect with Anger. His study in Longitudinal study is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Cohort effect, Young adult, Well-being and Self-esteem. He connects Current with Scale construction in his study.

Best Publications

  • Differences Between Tight and Loose Cultures: A 33-Nation Study

    Michele J . Gelfand;Jana L. Raver;Lisa Nishii;Lisa Art. Leslie

  • A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures

    Wilhelm Hofmann;Bertram Gawronski;Tobias Gschwendner;Huy Le

  • Statistik und Forschungsmethoden

    Michael Eid;Mario Gollwitzer;Manfred Schmitt

  • Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology.

    Jens B. Asendorpf;Mark Conner;Filip de Fruyt;Jan De Houwer

  • Working memory capacity and self-regulatory behavior: Toward an individual differences perspective on behavior determination by automatic versus controlled processes

    Wilhelm Hofmann;Tobias Gschwendner;Malte Friese;Reinout W. Wiers

  • Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences

    Rolf Steyer;Manfred Schmitt;Michael Eid

  • Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen

    Claudia Dalbert;Leo Montada;Manfred Schmitt

  • Justice sensitivity : assessment and location in the personality space

    Manfred Schmitt;Mario Gollwitzer;Dima Arbach

  • Integrating Personality Structure, Personality Process, and Personality Development:

    Anna Baumert;Anna Baumert;Manfred Schmitt;Marco Perugini;Wendy Johnson

  • States and traits in psychological assessment.

    Rolf Steyer;Dieter Ferring;Manfred J. Schmitt

  • Low self-esteem is a risk factor for depressive symptoms from young adulthood to old age

    Ulrich Orth;Richard W. Robins;Kali H. Trzesniewski;Jürgen Maes

  • The Justice Sensitivity Inventory: Factorial Validity, Location in the Personality Facet Space, Demographic Pattern, and Normative Data

    Manfred Schmitt;Anna Baumert;Mario Gollwitzer;Jürgen Maes

  • When and why do implicit measures predict behaviour? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance

    Malte Friese;Wilhelm Hofmann;Manfred Schmitt

  • Dispositional Sensitivity to Befallen Injustice

    Manfred J. Schmitt;Roland Neumann;Leo Montada

  • Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well‐being

    Manfred Schmitt;Martin Dörfel

  • What moderates implicit—explicit consistency?

    Wilhelm Hofmann;Tobias Gschwendner;Brian A. Nosek;Manfred Schmitt

  • Thinking about Justice and Dealing with One's Own Privileges

    Leo Montada;Manfred Schmitt;Claudia Dalbert

  • Asymmetrical Effects of Justice Sensitivity Perspectives on Prosocial and Antisocial Behavior

    Mario Gollwitzer;Manfred Schmitt;Rebecca Schalke;Jürgen Maes

  • Effects of objective and subjective account components on forgiving.

    Manfred Schmitt;Mario Gollwitzer;Nikolai Förster;Leo Montada

  • Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research

    Clara Sabbagh;Manfred Schmitt

  • What gives victims satisfaction when they seek revenge

    Mario Gollwitzer;Milena Meder;Manfred Schmitt

Frequent Co-Authors

Mario Gollwitzer
Mario Gollwitzer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Wilhelm Hofmann
Wilhelm Hofmann Ruhr University Bochum
Claudia Dalbert
Claudia Dalbert Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Beatrice Rammstedt
Beatrice Rammstedt Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences
Marco Perugini
Marco Perugini University of Milano-Bicocca
Brent W. Roberts
Brent W. Roberts University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Michael Eid
Michael Eid Freie Universität Berlin
Roland Imhoff
Roland Imhoff Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Jaap J. A. Denissen
Jaap J. A. Denissen Utrecht University
Colin MacLeod
Colin MacLeod University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide array of related online degrees and career pathways. Many students choose to further their studies with counseling programs, as demand for professionals in mental health and guidance continues to grow across the country.

If you’re interested in pursuing counseling, you may benefit from accelerated or convenient online options. For example, those seeking the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Hawaii can find programs that prioritize speed and flexibility. Similar opportunities exist elsewhere—searching for Idaho fastest counseling programs, or exploring Illinois accelerated counseling programs and Indiana accelerated counseling programs can help you find specialized and efficient tracks.

Online degrees in psychology and counseling not only offer flexible study, but also meet varying state licensure requirements. Whether you wish to work as a licensed counselor, school psychologist, or in other supportive roles, these fast-track and remote programs can streamline your journey and broaden your career options in the mental health field.

Best Scientists Citing Manfred Schmitt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles