World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Corinne A. Moss-Racusin

Corinne A. Moss-Racusin

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10710 10027 5598 5111 71 11269

Corinne A. Moss-Racusin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Corinne A. Moss-Racusin between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Corinne A. Moss-Racusin published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2018. 7 of the 94 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2018. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 5 publications
2006 2025

94 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Corinne A. Moss-Racusin: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 4
2008 2
2009 0
2010 6
2011 5
2012 9
2013 3
2014 8
2015 6
2016 5
2017 5
2018 11
2019 3
2020 4
2021 5
2022 6
2023 4
2024 2
2025 5
Total 94
Download as CSV

Corinne A. Moss-Racusin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Corinne A. Moss-Racusin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 71 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 71
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Corinne A. Moss-Racusin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Corinne A. Moss-Racusin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Corinne A. Moss-Racusin is affiliated with Skidmore College in the United States and has contributed extensively to the social sciences, focusing on gender studies and related subfields.

The scholar's research encompasses a range of topics including:

  • Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Career Development and Diversity
  • Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Climate Change Communication and Perception

Moss-Racusin publishes in various venues, with frequent contributions in:

  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology
  • PLoS ONE
  • Sex Roles
  • UNC Libraries
  • Science Advances

Their recent notable papers include:

  • "In some professions, women have become well represented, yet gender bias persists-Perpetuated by those who think it is not happening," 2020, Science Advances
  • "Implicit-Bias Remedies: Treating Discriminatory Bias as a Public-Health Problem," 2022, Gothic.net
  • "Open science, communal culture, and women's participation in the movement to improve science," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Boosting the Sustainable Representation of Women in STEM With Evidence-Based Policy Initiatives," 2021, Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • "Establishing the content of gender stereotypes across development," 2022, PLoS ONE

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Jojanneke van der Toorn
  • Christina M. Sanzari
  • Nilanjana Dasgupta
  • Jessi L. Smith
  • Evava S. Pietri

The scientist's work is primarily situated within the wider framework of social sciences, with a focus on detailed aspects such as gender studies, sociology and political science, social psychology, safety research, and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their publication record reflects an ongoing engagement with issues related to gender roles, bias, and diversity in professional and academic contexts.

Best Publications

  • Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students

    Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;John F. Dovidio;Victoria L. Brescoll;Mark J. Graham

  • Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders.

    Laurie A. Rudman;Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Julie E. Phelan;Sanne Nauts

  • When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men.

    Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Julie E. Phelan;Laurie A. Rudman

  • Weight stigmatization and bias reduction: perspectives of overweight and obese adults

    Rebecca M Puhl;Corinne A Moss-Racusin;Marlene B Schwartz;Kelly D Brownell

  • Internalization of weight bias: Implications for binge eating and emotional well-being.

    Rebecca M. Puhl;Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Marlene B. Schwartz

  • Competent Yet Out in the Cold: Shifting Criteria for Hiring Reflect Backlash Toward Agentic Women

    Julie E. Phelan;Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Laurie A. Rudman

  • DISRUPTIONS IN WOMEN'S SELF-PROMOTION: THE BACKLASH AVOIDANCE MODEL

    Corinne Alison Moss-Racusin;Laurie A Rudman

  • Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder.

    Ian M. Handley;Elizabeth R. Brown;Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Jessi L. Smith

  • Reactions to Vanguards: Advances in Backlash Theory

    Laurie A. Rudman;Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Peter Glick;Julie E. Phelan

  • Gender differences in work-family guilt in parents of young children.

    Jessica L. Borelli;S. Katherine Nelson;Laura M. River;Sarah A. Birken

  • Scientific Diversity Interventions

    Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Jojanneke van der Toorn;John F. Dovidio;Victoria L. Brescoll

  • Gender Bias Produces Gender Gaps in STEM Engagement

    Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Christina Sanzari;Nava Caluori;Helena Rabasco

  • In some professions, women have become well represented, yet gender bias persists—Perpetuated by those who think it is not happening

    C. T. Begeny;M. K. Ryan;M. K. Ryan;C. A. Moss-Racusin;G. Ravetz

  • When Do We Confront? Perceptions of Costs and Benefits Predict Confronting Discrimination on Behalf of the Self and Others

    Jessica J. Good;Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Diana T. Sanchez

  • Can Evidence Impact Attitudes? Public Reactions to Evidence of Gender Bias in STEM Fields:

    Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Aneta K. Molenda;Charlotte R. Cramer

  • A "Scientific Diversity" Intervention to Reduce Gender Bias in a Sample of Life Scientists.

    Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Jojanneke van der Toorn;John F. Dovidio;Victoria L. Brescoll

  • Reactions to Gender Egalitarian Men: Perceived Feminization Due to Stigma-by-Association

    Laurie A. Rudman;Kris Mescher;Corinne A. Moss-Racusin

  • The Gender Role Motivation Model of Women’s Sexually Submissive Behavior and Satisfaction in Heterosexual Couples

    Diana T. Sanchez;Julie E. Phelan;Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Jessica J. Good

  • Relationship Contingency and Sexual Motivation in Women: Implications for Sexual Satisfaction

    Diana T. Sanchez;Corinne A. Moss-Racusin;Julie E. Phelan;Jennifer Crocker

  • Masculinity, status, and subordination: Why working for a gender stereotype violator causes men to lose status

    Victoria L. Brescoll;Eric Luis Uhlmann;Corinne Moss-Racusin;Corinne Moss-Racusin;Lonnie Sarnell

  • Backlash against male elementary educators

    Corinne A. Moss‐Racusin;Elizabeth R. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Diana T. Sanchez
Diana T. Sanchez Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
John F. Dovidio
John F. Dovidio Yale University
Jo Handelsman
Jo Handelsman University of Wisconsin–Madison
Laurie A. Rudman
Laurie A. Rudman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jessi L. Smith
Jessi L. Smith University of Colorado Colorado Springs
Michelle K. Ryan
Michelle K. Ryan University of Exeter
Nilanjana Dasgupta
Nilanjana Dasgupta University of Massachusetts Amherst
Amanda B. Diekman
Amanda B. Diekman Indiana University
Jessica L. Borelli
Jessica L. Borelli University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens the door to a variety of fulfilling online career pathways, particularly in counseling and substance abuse treatment. Many students are drawn to the flexibility of online psychology programs, which can prepare you for licensing exams and clinical practice while accommodating your schedule.

Substance abuse counseling is a growing career option for psychology graduates. The path to becoming a counselor often varies by location, with specific certification and education requirements for different cities. For example, those interested in counseling careers in Texas should review the San Antonio substance abuse counselor certification requirements. If you’re aiming to work in California, check the San Diego substance abuse counselor certification requirements or learn more about becoming a substance abuse counselor in San Francisco.

Understanding local credentialing is crucial. For instance, aspiring professionals can get details on the San Jose substance abuse counselors education requirements to ensure they meet all state and city guidelines. As the demand for qualified counselors increases, online psychology degrees provide valuable opportunities for students wishing to make a positive impact in their communities.

Best Scientists Citing Corinne A. Moss-Racusin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles