World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
13838
World Ranking
7703
National Ranking
4125

Nilanjana Dasgupta publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nilanjana Dasgupta sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 79 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nilanjana Dasgupta D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nilanjana Dasgupta sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Nilanjana Dasgupta is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States and focuses their research primarily within the social sciences and psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields including sociology and political science, social psychology, education, safety research, and gender studies. These areas contribute to an understanding of social dynamics, identity, and group interactions.

The main topics addressed in their research encompass social and intergroup psychology, cultural differences and values, career development and diversity, higher education research studies, mentoring and academic development, racial and ethnic identity research, and gender diversity and inequality.

Dasgupta's recent publications reflect a wide range of interests. Notable papers include:

  • "Implicit-Bias Remedies: Treating Discriminatory Bias as a Public-Health Problem" (2022) published in Gothic.net
  • "An integrative framework on the impact of allies: How identity-based needs influence intergroup solidarity and social movements" (2020) published in European Journal of Social Psychology
  • "Open science, communal culture, and women's participation in the movement to improve science" (2020) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "From Precollege to Career: Barriers Facing Historically Marginalized Students and Evidence-Based Solutions" (2022) published in Social Issues and Policy Review
  • "Female peer mentors early in college have lasting positive impacts on female engineering students that persist beyond graduation" (2022) published in Nature Communications

Frequent publication venues for Dasgupta's research include the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Gothic.net, European Journal of Social Psychology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Social Issues and Policy Review.

Collaborative efforts are a key feature of Dasgupta's work. Frequent co-authors listed include Deborah Wu, Sapna Cheryan, Amanda B. Diekman, Adrian Rivera-Rodriguez, and Kelsey C. Thiem.

Their contributions have been recognized by their peers, as evidenced by the 2018 award of Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA).

Best Publications

  • On the malleability of automatic attitudes: combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals.

    Nilanjana Dasgupta;Anthony G. Greenwald

  • STEMing the Tide: Using Ingroup Experts to Inoculate Women's Self-Concept in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)

    Jane G. Stout;Nilanjana Dasgupta;Matthew Hunsinger;Melissa A. McManus

  • Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping

    Nilanjana Dasgupta;Shaki Asgari

  • Implicit Bias in the Courtroom

    Jerry Kang;Judge Mark Bennett;Devon Carbado;Pam Casey

  • Automatic Preference for White Americans: Eliminating the Familiarity Explanation

    Nilanjana Dasgupta;Debbie E McGhee;Anthony G Greenwald;Mahzarin R Banaji

  • Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: STEMing the Tide and Broadening Participation in STEM Careers

    Nilanjana Dasgupta;Jane G. Stout

  • Implicit Ingroup Favoritism, Outgroup Favoritism, and Their Behavioral Manifestations

    Nilanjana Dasgupta

  • Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept: The Stereotype Inoculation Model

    Nilanjana Dasgupta

  • Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering

    Tara C Dennehy;Nilanjana Dasgupta

  • Prejudice From Thin Air The Effect of Emotion on Automatic Intergroup Attitudes

    David DeSteno;Nilanjana Dasgupta;Monica Y. Bartlett;Aida Cajdric

  • Female peers in small work groups enhance women's motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering

    Nilanjana Dasgupta;Melissa McManus Scircle;Matthew Hunsinger

  • Fanning the flames of prejudice: The influence of specific incidental emotions on implicit prejudice.

    Nilanjana Dasgupta;David DeSteno;Lisa A. Williams;Matthew Hunsinger

  • When He Doesn’t Mean You: Gender-Exclusive Language as Ostracism

    Jane G. Stout;Nilanjana Dasgupta

  • Group entitativity and group perception: Associations between physical features and psychological judgment

    Nilanjana Dasgupta;Mahzarin R. Banaji;Robert P. Abelson

  • The existence of implicit bias is beyond reasonable doubt: A refutation of ideological and methodological objections and executive summary of ten studies that no manager should ignore

    John T. Jost;Laurie A. Rudman;Irene V. Blair;Dana R. Carney

  • Perceptions of the Collective Other

    Robert P. Abelson;Nilanjana Dasgupta;Jaihyun Park;Mahzarin R. Banaji

  • Subgroup prejudice based on skin color among Hispanics in the United States and Latin America

    Eric Uhlmann;Nilanjana Dasgupta;Angelica Elgueta;Anthony G. Greenwald

  • From automatic antigay prejudice to behavior: the moderating role of conscious beliefs about gender and behavioral control.

    Nilanjana Dasgupta;Luis M. Rivera

  • Believing Is Seeing: The Effects of Racial Labels and Implicit Beliefs on Face Perception

    Jennifer L. Eberhardt;Nilanjana Dasgupta;Tracy L. Banaszynski

  • When Social Context Matters: The Influence of Long–Term Contact and Short–Term Exposure to Admired Outgroup Members on Implicit Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions

    Nilanjana Dasgupta;Luis M. Rivera

Frequent Co-Authors

Kumar Yogeeswaran
Kumar Yogeeswaran University of Canterbury
Anthony G. Greenwald
Anthony G. Greenwald University of Washington
Mahzarin R. Banaji
Mahzarin R. Banaji Harvard University
Michael Parker
Michael Parker University of Oxford
Franco Pestilli
Franco Pestilli The University of Texas at Austin
David DeSteno
David DeSteno Northeastern University
Laurie A. Rudman
Laurie A. Rudman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Robert P. Abelson
Robert P. Abelson Yale University
John T. Jost
John T. Jost New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying psychology in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open up a wide range of career pathways. Many students pursue bachelor's or master's programs in psychology, counseling, or related fields. These credentials form the foundation for jobs in mental health, social services, education, and beyond.

For those interested in the counseling profession, you’ll need to meet specific licensure requirements that vary by location. For example, becoming a licensed therapist in Toledo involves completing accredited coursework, supervised clinical hours, and passing required exams. Similarly, if you want to know how to become a licensed therapist in Tucson, you’ll find unique state regulations and mandated practical experience.

Requirements differ even further in other cities. Those seeking guidance on Tulsa licensed therapist requirements or licensed therapist requirements in Virginia Beach will discover distinct education, examination, and internship stipulations.

It’s important to research and compare programs, including online options, to ensure they meet the educational and licensing standards for your intended career pathway and location.

Best Scientists Citing Nilanjana Dasgupta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles