World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
5478
World Ranking
9837
National Ranking
470

Melanie C. Steffens publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melanie C. Steffens sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 158 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Melanie C. Steffens D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melanie C. Steffens sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Is the Implicit Association Test Immune to Faking

    Melanie C. Steffens

  • On the leaky math pipeline: Comparing implicit math-gender stereotypes and math withdrawal in female and male children and adolescents.

    Melanie C. Steffens;Petra Jelenec;Peter Noack

  • Blinded by the accent! The minor role of looks in ethnic categorization.

    Tamara Rakić;Melanie C. Steffens;Amélie Mummendey

  • Attitudes toward lesbians, gay men, bisexual women, and bisexual men in Germany

    Melanie C Steffens;Christof Wagner

  • Traditional Masculinity and Femininity: Validation of a New Scale Assessing Gender Roles

    Sven Kachel;Melanie C. Steffens;Claudia Niedlich

  • Separating Implicit Gender Stereotypes regarding Math and Language: Implicit Ability Stereotypes are Self-serving for Boys and Men, but not for Girls and Women

    Melanie C. Steffens;Petra Jelenec

  • Predicting Spontaneous Big Five Behavior with Implicit Association Tests

    Melanie C. Steffens;Stefanie Schulze König

  • Implicit and explicit attitudes towards lesbians and gay men.

    Melanie C Steffens

  • Items’ Cross-Category Associations as a Confounding Factor in the Implicit Association Test

    Melanie C. Steffens;Inga Plewe

  • Implicit Association Test: Separating Transsituationally Stable and Variable Components of Attitudes toward Gay Men

    Melanie C. Steffens;Axel Buchner

  • When it matters how you pronounce it: The influence of regional accents on job interview outcome

    Tamara Rakić;Melanie C. Steffens;Amélie Mummendey

  • What Do You Mean by “European”? Evidence of Spontaneous Ingroup Projection

    Mauro Bianchi;Amélie Mummendey;Melanie C. Steffens;Vincent Y. Yzerbyt

  • How to like yourself better, or chocolate less: Changing implicit attitudes with one IAT task

    Irena D. Ebert;Melanie C. Steffens;Rul von Stülpnagel;Petra Jelenec

  • Determ inants of Positive and Negative Generation Effects in Free Recall

    Melanie C. Steffens;Edgar Erdfelder

  • How diversity training can change attitudes: Increasing perceived complexity of superordinate groups to improve intergroup relations ☆

    Franziska Ehrke;Anne Berthold;Melanie C. Steffens

  • The nature of memory processes underlying recognition judgments in the process dissociation procedure

    Axel Buchner;Edgar Erdfelder;Melanie C. Steffens;Heike Martensen

  • We Are the World—and They Are Not: Prototypicality for the World Community, Legitimacy, and Responses to Global Inequality

    Gerhard Reese;Anne Berthold;Melanie C. Steffens

  • A Multinomial Model to Assess Fluency and Recollection in a Sequence Learning Task

    Axel Buchner;Melanie C. Steffens;Edgar Erdfelder;Rainer Rothkegel

  • Irrelevant auditory material affects counting.

    Axel Buchner;Melanie C. Steffens;Lisa Irmen;Karl F. Wender

  • Warm, but Maybe Not So Competent?—Contemporary Implicit Stereotypes of Women and Men in Germany

    Irena D. Ebert;Melanie C. Steffens;Alexandra Kroth

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Recently Published Articles