World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 61 3403 3138 48 47 156 13173

Anne Maass publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anne Maass between 1980 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anne Maass published across 47 years, from 1980 to 2026, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2024. 5 of the 179 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2024. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 6 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
1980 2026

179 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anne Maass: publications per year, 1980 to 2026
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 1
1982 3
1983 2
1984 1
1985 2
1986 1
1987 1
1988 3
1989 6
1990 2
1991 2
1992 2
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 3
1997 1
1998 2
1999 4
2000 4
2001 1
2002 1
2003 6
2004 2
2005 5
2006 5
2007 6
2008 8
2009 4
2010 2
2011 6
2012 9
2013 6
2014 5
2015 7
2016 6
2017 9
2018 7
2019 2
2020 6
2021 7
2022 6
2023 3
2024 11
2025 4
2026 1
Total 179
Download as CSV

Anne Maass publications per year - data summary

  • Anne Maass, a Psychology scholar from University of Padua, has 179 publications recorded across 47 years, from 1980 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1980 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2024, with 11 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1980, 1981, 1984, 1986 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 47 years in the span carries no publications at all (1994).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.9 per year counting only the 46 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 25 publications, 14% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1980-1995: 30 publications (1.9 per year); 1996-2011: 60 publications (3.8 per year); 2012-2026: 89 publications (5.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Anne Maass publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Maass sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 156 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 156
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anne Maass publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Anne Maass, a Psychology scholar from University of Padua, records 156 publications - the 52nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 52% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Anne Maass, and about 48% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Anne Maass falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Anne Maass D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Maass sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 61
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Anne Maass D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Anne Maass, a Psychology scholar from University of Padua, records 61 D-Index - the 71st percentile of the discipline.
  • 71% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Anne Maass, and about 29% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Anne Maass ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Anne Maass is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy and has made contributions primarily in the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main topics addressed in their work cover Social and Intergroup Psychology, Cultural Differences and Values, Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, Taxation and Compliance Studies, Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection, Linguistic Variation and Morphology, and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics.

Recent publications by Anne Maass include:

  • Language and Social Cognition (2022), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology
  • The Language of Derogation and Hate: Functions, Consequences, and Reappropriation (2020), Journal of Language and Social Psychology
  • Gay Voice: Stable Marker of Sexual Orientation or Flexible Communication Device? (2020), Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Tax the élites! The role of economic inequality and conspiracy beliefs on attitudes towards taxes and redistribution intentions (2022), British Journal of Social Psychology
  • "Make it Happen!" (2021), Social Psychology

Anne Maass frequently collaborates with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Carmen Cervone
  • Caterina Suitner
  • Bruno Gabriel Salvador Casara
  • Federica Durante
  • Attila Gáspár

The scientist's work has been published repeatedly in several academic venues, among which the most frequent include:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Journal of Language and Social Psychology
  • British Journal of Social Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Best Publications

  • Language use in intergroup contexts: the linguistic intergroup bias

    Anne Maass;Daniela Salvi;Luciano Arcuri;Gün R. Semin

  • Why Do Women Underperform Under Stereotype Threat? Evidence for the Role of Negative Thinking

    Mara Cadinu;Anne Maass;Alessandra Rosabianca;Jeff Kiesner

  • The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome?

    Naomi Ellemers;Henriette van den Heuvel;Dick de Gilder;Anne Maass

  • Sexual harassment under social identity threat: the computer harassment paradigm.

    Anne Maass;Mara Cadinu;Gaia Guarnieri;Annalisa Grasselli

  • Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research.

    Anne Maass;Russell D. Clark

  • Stereotype threat: The effect of expectancy on performance.

    Mara Cadinu;Anne Maass;Sara Frigerio;Lisa Impagliazzo

  • Linguistic Intergroup Bias: Stereotype Perpetuation Through Language

    Anne Maass

  • Accuracy of eyewitness identification in a field setting.

    John C. Brigham;Anne Maass;Larry D. Snyder;Kenneth Spaulding

  • Group Norms, Threat, and Children's Racial Prejudice

    Drew Nesdale;Anne Maass;Kevin Durkin;Judith Griffiths

  • Directional Bias in the Mental Representation of Spatial Events Nature or Culture

    Anne Maass;Aurore Russo

  • Eyewitness identification: Simulating the “Weapon effect”

    Anne Maass;Günther Köhnken

  • Threat, Group Identification, and Children's Ethnic Prejudice

    Drew Nesdale;Kevin Durkin;Anne Maass;Judith Anne Griffiths

  • Linguistic intergroup bias: Evidence for in-group-protective motivation.

    Anne Maass;Roberta Ceccarelli;Samantha Rudin

  • Nomina Sunt Omina: On the Inductive Potential of Nouns and Adjectives in Person Perception

    Andrea Carnaghi;Anne Maass;Sara Gresta;Mauro Bianchi

  • Objectifying Media Their Effect on Gender Role Norms and Sexual Harassment of Women

    Silvia Galdi;Anne Maass;Maria Rosaria Cadinu

  • Linguistic intergroup bias: differential expectancies or in-group protection?

    Anne Maass;Angela Milesi;Silvia Zabbini;Dagmar Stahlberg

  • Internalization versus compliance: Differential processes underlying minority influence and conformity

    Anne Maass;Russell D. Clark

  • Seeing women as objects: The sexual body part recognition bias

    Sarah J. Gervais;Theresa K. Vescio;Jens Förster;Anne Maass

  • Intentional control over prejudice: when the choice of the measure matters

    Francesca M. Franco;Anne Maass

  • Empathy, group norms and children's ethnic attitudes

    Drew Nesdale;Judith Griffith;Kevin Durkin;Anne Maass

Frequent Co-Authors

Drew Nesdale
Drew Nesdale Griffith University
Kevin Durkin
Kevin Durkin University of Strathclyde
Howard Giles
Howard Giles University of California, Santa Barbara
John C. Brigham
John C. Brigham Florida State University
Sabine Koch
Sabine Koch Karolinska Institute
Stephen G. West
Stephen G. West Arizona State University
Sabine Sczesny
Sabine Sczesny University of Bern
Luigi Castelli
Luigi Castelli University of Padua
Jens Förster
Jens Förster RWTH Aachen University
Maria Paola Paladino
Maria Paola Paladino University of Trento

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers. With the flexibility of online degrees, students can pursue specialties such as clinical psychology, counseling, or mental health services from anywhere. These programs often serve as essential steps for those who wish to become licensed therapists.

Licensing requirements can differ significantly by location. For example, learn more about how to become a licensed therapist in Tucson or discover the specific licensed therapist requirements in Tulsa. If you're considering practice in the eastern US, see the detailed steps for becoming a licensed therapist in Virginia Beach. There are also distinct pathways and regulations for how to become a licensed therapist in Washington DC.

Carefully researching your chosen state’s requirements and selecting the right online degree can set you up for a successful career in psychology or counseling. Always check local regulations and seek accredited programs to ensure the best professional outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Anne Maass

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles