World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
S. Alexander Haslam

S. Alexander Haslam

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 128 180 157 11 11 484 73123

S. Alexander Haslam publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by S. Alexander Haslam between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. S. Alexander Haslam published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 17.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 61 publications in 2025. 83 of the 620 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 61. Peak 61 publications in 2025. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 37 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 33 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 61 publications
1991 2025

620 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
S. Alexander Haslam: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 2
1993 3
1994 5
1995 6
1996 4
1997 2
1998 7
1999 3
2000 2
2001 7
2002 4
2003 6
2004 8
2005 9
2006 13
2007 16
2008 17
2009 16
2010 26
2011 19
2012 27
2013 23
2014 29
2015 37
2016 32
2017 29
2018 33
2019 26
2020 27
2021 38
2022 36
2023 24
2024 22
2025 61
Total 620
Download as CSV

S. Alexander Haslam publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where S. Alexander Haslam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–490 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 484 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28 484
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

S. Alexander Haslam D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where S. Alexander Haslam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 128–129 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19 128
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

S. Alexander Haslam is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and social sciences, with a notable concentration in subfields including social psychology, sociology and political science, general health professions, organizational behavior and human resource management, and health.

Their work addresses several key topics, among which are:

  • Social and intergroup psychology
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Cultural differences and values
  • Sport psychology and performance
  • Job satisfaction and organizational behavior
  • Motivation and self-concept in sports
  • Community health and development

Haslam has contributed to multiple scientific papers, with recent publications including:

  • "Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response" (2020), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Advancing the social identity theory of leadership: A meta-analytic review of leader group prototypicality" (2020), published in Organizational Psychology Review
  • "Life Change, Social Identity, and Health" (2020), published in Annual Review of Psychology
  • "Neoliberalism can reduce well-being by promoting a sense of social disconnection, competition, and loneliness" (2021), published in British Journal of Social Psychology
  • "Social identity makes group-based social connection possible: Implications for loneliness and mental health" (2021), published in Current Opinion in Psychology

Frequent co-authors working alongside Haslam include:

  • Niklas K. Steffens
  • Catherine Haslam
  • Tegan Cruwys
  • Jolanda Jetten
  • Sarah V. Bentley

Their research has been published repeatedly in several venues, with the most prolific publication outlets being:

  • British Journal of Social Psychology
  • Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • The Leadership Quarterly
  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology

In addition to articles, Haslam has contributed to book publications, including one titled Groups 4 Health, scheduled for release by Oxford University Press in 2025.

The scientist has been recognized by their peers as a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

    Jay J. Van Bavel;Katherine Baicker;Paulo S. Boggio;Valerio Capraro

  • Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context:

    John C. Turner;Penelope J. Oakes;S. Alexander Haslam;Craig McGarty

  • Stereotyping and Social Reality

    Penelope J. Oakes;S. Alexander Haslam;John C. Turner

  • Psychology in Organizations: The Social-Identity Approach

    S. Alexander Haslam

  • The New Psychology of Leadership: Identity, Influence and Power

    S. Alexander Haslam;Stephen D. Reicher;Michael J. Platow

  • The Glass Cliff: Evidence that Women are Over‐Represented in Precarious Leadership Positions

    Michelle K. Ryan;S. Alexander Haslam

  • Social Identity, Health and Well-Being: An Emerging Agenda for Applied Psychology

    S. Alexander Haslam;Jolanda Jetten;Tom Postmes;Catherine Haslam

  • Motivating Individuals and Groups at Work: A Social Identity Perspective on Leadership and Group Performance

    Naomi Ellemers;Dick De Gilder;S. Alexander Haslam

  • The Glass Cliff: Exploring the Dynamics Surrounding the Appointment of Women to Precarious Leadership Positions

    Michelle K. Ryan;S. Alexander Haslam

  • The social cure : identity, health and well-being

    Jolanda Jetten;Catherine Haslam;S. Alexander Haslam

  • A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility

    Tom Postmes;S. Alexander Haslam;Lise Jans

  • Taking the strain: Social identity, social support, and the experience of stress

    S. Alexander Haslam;Anne O'Brien;Jolanda Jetten;Karine Vormedal

  • Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality

    Stephen Reicher;S. Alexander Haslam;Nick Hopkins

  • Social Identity, Organizational Identity and Corporate Identity: Towards an Integrated Understanding of Processes, Patternings and Products

    Joep P. Cornelissen;S. Alexander Haslam;John M. T. Balmer

  • The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations

    S. Alexander Haslam;Michelle K. Ryan

  • Think crisis-think female: the glass cliff and contextual variation in the think manager-think male stereotype.

    Michelle K. Ryan;S. Alexander Haslam;Mette D. Hersby;Renata Bongiorno

  • The New Psychology of Health : Unlocking the Social Cure

    Catherine Haslam;Jolanda Jetten;Tegan Cruwys;Genevieve A. Dingle

  • Maintaining group memberships: Social identity continuity predicts well-being after stroke

    Catherine Haslam;Abigail Holme;S. Alexander Haslam;Aarti Iyer

  • Stressing the group: social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress.

    S. Alexander Haslam;Stephen Reicher

  • Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations

    Penelope J. Oakes;John C. Turner;S. Alexander Haslam

  • Social Identity, Self-categorization, and Work Motivation: Rethinking the Contribution of the Group to Positive and Sustainable Organisational Outcomes

    S. Alexander Haslam;Clare Powell;John C. Turner

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen Reicher
Stephen Reicher University of St Andrews
Jolanda Jetten
Jolanda Jetten University of Queensland
Catherine Haslam
Catherine Haslam University of Queensland
Niklas K. Steffens
Niklas K. Steffens University of Queensland
Tegan Cruwys
Tegan Cruwys Australian National University
Michael J. Platow
Michael J. Platow Australian National University
Michelle K. Ryan
Michelle K. Ryan University of Exeter
Katherine J. Reynolds
Katherine J. Reynolds Australian National University
John C. Turner
John C. Turner Australian National University
Tom Postmes
Tom Postmes University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your education in psychology often means exploring related online degrees, especially in counseling, which offers flexible career options and growing job prospects. Accredited counseling programs can open doors to careers as school counselors, mental health counselors, and other vital roles supporting individuals and communities.

When evaluating your options, consider both the academic reputation and the return on investment. To start, compare programs like the most valuable counseling programs in Missouri. If you’re looking beyond Missouri, the best value counseling degrees in Pennsylvania highlight top schools with a balance of affordability and industry respect.

Location can make a difference too. For those interested in larger cities, explore the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Philadelphia. Alternatively, the best value counseling programs in Seattle offer opportunities in the Pacific Northwest.

By researching these online degree options, students can find pathways that combine flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and strong career outcomes in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing S. Alexander Haslam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles