World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
40
Citations
8903
World Ranking
6003
National Ranking
2047

Shalene Jha publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shalene Jha sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 108 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Shalene Jha D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shalene Jha sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shalene Jha is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in agricultural and biological sciences as well as environmental science. Their work spans key areas such as ecology, evolution, behavior, systematics, plant science, insect science, genetics, and health-related toxicology and mutagenesis.

The scientist's recent publications include notable papers such as:

  • Towards a U.S. national program for monitoring native bees (2020) - Biological Conservation
  • Wild insect diversity increases inter-annual stability in global crop pollinator communities (2021) - Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • The relationship between pollinator community and pollination services is mediated by floral abundance in urban landscapes (2020) - Urban Ecosystems
  • Gardener demographics, experience, and motivations drive differences in plant species richness and composition in urban gardens (2020) - Ecology and Society
  • Fine-scale monitoring and mapping of biodiversity and ecosystem services reveals multiple synergies and few tradeoffs in urban green space management (2022) - The Science of The Total Environment

Shalene Jha's frequent co-authors include Stacy M. Philpott, Heidi Liere, Brenda B. Lin, Peter Bichier, and John L. Neff. The scientist has published multiple articles in venues such as The Science of The Total Environment, Urban Ecosystems, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Ecological Applications.

Their research topics cover a broad range within biological and environmental domains, focusing on:

  • Plant and animal studies
  • Insect and pesticide research
  • Plant parasitism and resistance
  • Insect and arachnid ecology and behavior
  • Urban green space and health
  • Ecology and vegetation dynamics studies
  • Urban agriculture and sustainability

Jha's work frequently addresses ecological interactions involving pollinators and urban ecosystems, reflecting a multidimensional approach to environmental science and agricultural sustainability. Their research combines field data and ecological theory to examine biodiversity patterns, pollination services, and human impacts on natural systems.

Best Publications

  • A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems

    Christina M. Kennedy;Eric Lonsdorf;Maile C. Neel;Neal M. Williams

  • Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation

    David Kleijn;Rachael Winfree;Ignasi Bartomeus;Luísa G. Carvalheiro;Luísa G. Carvalheiro

  • A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production

    Matteo Dainese;Emily A. Martin;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • The future of urban agriculture and biodiversity-ecosystem services: Challenges and next steps

    Brenda B. Lin;Stacy M. Philpott;Shalene Jha

  • Shade Coffee: Update on a Disappearing Refuge for Biodiversity

    Shalene Jha;Christopher M. Bacon;Stacy M. Philpott;V. Ernesto Méndez

  • A global synthesis of the effects of diversified farming systems on arthropod diversity within fields and across agricultural landscapes.

    Elinor M. Lichtenberg;Elinor M. Lichtenberg;Christina M. Kennedy;Claire Kremen;Péter Batáry

  • Resource diversity and landscape-level homogeneity drive native bee foraging

    Shalene Jha;Claire Kremen

  • A multi-scale assessment of hurricane impacts on agricultural landscapes based on land use and topographic features

    Stacy M. Philpott;Brenda B. Lin;Shalene Jha;Shannon J. Brines

  • Urban land use limits regional bumble bee gene flow.

    Shalene Jha;C. Kremen

  • Impacts of coffee agroforestry management on tropical bee communities.

    Shalene Jha;Shalene Jha;J. H. Vandermeer

  • Population growth, human development, and deforestation in biodiversity hotspots.

    S Jha;S Jha;S Kamaljit Bawa

  • A Review of Ecosystem Services, Farmer Livelihoods, and Value Chains in Shade Coffee Agroecosystems

    Shalene Jha;Christopher M. Bacon;Stacy M. Philpott;Robert A. Rice

  • Contemporary human-altered landscapes and oceanic barriers reduce bumble bee gene flow

    S. Jha

  • Natural land cover drives pollinator abundance and richness, leading to reductions in pollen limitation in cotton agroecosystems

    Sarah Cusser;John L. Neff;Shalene Jha

  • Native bees mediate long-distance pollen dispersal in a shade coffee landscape mosaic

    Shalene Jha;Christopher W. Dick;Christopher W. Dick

  • Landscape genetics of a tropical rescue pollinator

    Rodolfo Jaffé;Antonio Castilla;Nathaniel Pope;Vera Lucia Imperatriz-Fonseca

  • Towards a U.S. national program for monitoring native bees

    S. Hollis Woodard;Sarah Federman;Rosalind R. James;Bryan N. Danforth

  • Wild insect diversity increases inter-annual stability in global crop pollinator communities

    Deepa Senapathi;Jochen Fründ;Matthias Albrecht;Michael P.D. Garratt

  • A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production

    Matteo Dainese;Emily A. Martin;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • Wild bee nutritional ecology: predicting pollinator population dynamics, movement, and services from floral resources.

    S Hollis Woodard;Shalene Jha

  • Contrasting bee foraging in response to resource scale and local habitat management

    Shalene Jha;John H. Vandermeer

Frequent Co-Authors

Stacy M. Philpott
Stacy M. Philpott University of California, Santa Cruz
Luísa G. Carvalheiro
Luísa G. Carvalheiro Universidade Federal de Goiás
Brenda B. Lin
Brenda B. Lin Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Claire Kremen
Claire Kremen University of British Columbia
Maj Rundlöf
Maj Rundlöf Lund University
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter University of Würzburg
Simon G. Potts
Simon G. Potts University of Reading
Andrea Holzschuh
Andrea Holzschuh University of Würzburg
Peter Bichier
Peter Bichier University of California, Santa Cruz
Bryan N. Danforth
Bryan N. Danforth Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in studying Ecology and Evolution, online education offers flexible pathways to launch or advance your career. Many choose to pursue specialized graduate degrees or complement their science background with credentials in healthcare or education.

Online options are growing in fields related to biology, nursing, and conservation. If you are considering advancing your studies in nursing, there are direct entry msn programs designed for non-nurses looking to transition quickly into the healthcare sector. For those comparing nursing programs, you can review differences and similarities in formats and outcomes between schools such as wgu vs chamberlain to find the best fit for your professional goals.

Professionals with a BSN looking to further their education can explore online bsn to msn programs that offer bridge options at affordable rates. When choosing a program, consider institutions recognized for quality and credibility such as the nonprofit online universities listed by leading education guides.

Careers following Ecology and Evolution studies can include research, policy, teaching, or roles within healthcare and environmental organizations. Online degree options make it easier than ever to tailor your education to your future pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Shalene Jha

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles