World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
68
Citations
13383
World Ranking
7951
National Ranking
267

Aline Dumuis publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aline Dumuis sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 111 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Aline Dumuis D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aline Dumuis sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Aline Dumuis is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research focuses primarily on Neuroscience with an emphasis on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work centers around several main topics including:

  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Aline Dumuis has contributed to multiple publications in leading venues, notably the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE and UNC Libraries. The following recent papers are part of their scholarly output:

  • 5-Hydroxytryptamine receptors in GtoPdb v.2023.1 (2023) - IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE
  • Engineering GPCR signaling pathways with RASSLs (2020) - UNC Libraries
  • 5-Hydroxytryptamine receptors in GtoPdb v.2025.1 (2025) - IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE
  • 5-Hydroxytryptamine receptors in GtoPdb v.2025.3 (2025) - IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Bryan L. Roth
  • Nicholas M. Barnes
  • Gordon S. Baxter
  • Joël Bockaert
  • Theresa A. Branchek

Best Publications

  • NMDA receptors activate the arachidonic acid cascade system in striatal neurons

    A. Dumuis;M. Sebben;L. Haynes;J. P. Pin

  • A nonclassical 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor positively coupled with adenylate cyclase in the central nervous system

    A Dumuis;R Bouhelal;M Sebben;R Cory

  • The gastrointestinal prokinetic benzamide derivatives are agonists at the non-classical 5-HT receptor (5-HT4) positively coupled to adenylate cyclase in neurons

    Aline Dumuis;Michèle Sebben;Joël Bockaert

  • GPCR interacting proteins (GIP).

    Joël Bockaert;Laurent Fagni;Aline Dumuis;Philippe Marin

  • The 5-HT4 receptor: a place in the sun.

    Joël Bockaert;John R. Fozard;Aline Dumuis;David E. Clarke

  • Neuronal 5-HT metabotropic receptors: fine-tuning of their structure, signaling, and roles in synaptic modulation

    Joël Bockaert;Sylvie Claeysen;Carine Bécamel;Aline Dumuis

  • Central 5-HT4 receptors

    Richard M. Eglen;Erik H.F. Wong;Aline Dumuis;Joël Bockaert

  • The ‘magic tail’ of G protein-coupled receptors: an anchorage for functional protein networks

    Joël Bockaert;Philippe Marin;Aline Dumuis;Laurent Fagni

  • Alternative splicing in the N-terminal extracellular domain of the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) receptor modulates receptor selectivity and relative potencies of PACAP-27 and PACAP-38 in phospholipase C activation.

    Colette Pantaloni;Philippe Brabet;Benoit Bilanges;Aline Dumuis

  • Arachidonic acid released from striatal neurons by joint stimulation of ionotropic and metabotropic quisqualate receptors.

    Aline Dumuis;Jean Philippe Pin;Kiyoshi Oomagari;Michèle Sebben

  • Engineering GPCR signaling pathways with RASSLs

    Bruce R. Conklin;Edward C. Hsiao;Sylvie Claeysen;Aline Dumuis

  • Pharmacological characterization of 5-hydroxytryptamine4(5-HT4) receptors positively coupled to adenylate cyclase in adult guinea pig hippocampal membranes: effect of substituted benzamide derivatives.

    J Bockaert;M Sebben;A Dumuis

  • 5-HT7 Receptor Is Coupled to Gα Subunits of Heterotrimeric G12-Protein to Regulate Gene Transcription and Neuronal Morphology

    Elena Kvachnina;Guoquan Liu;Alexander Dityatev;Ute Renner

  • Novel brain-specific 5-HT4 receptor splice variants show marked constitutive activity: role of the C-terminal intracellular domain.

    Sylvie Claeysen;Michèle Sebben;Carine Becamel;Joël Bockaert

  • 5-HT4 receptors.

    Joël Bockaert;S. Claeysen;Valerie Compan;Aline Dumuis

  • Synaptic multiprotein complexes associated with 5-HT2C receptors: a proteomic approach

    Carine Bécamel;Gérard Alonso;Nathalie Galéotti;Emmanuelle Demey

  • The Serotonin 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C Receptors Interact with Specific Sets of PDZ Proteins

    Carine Bécamel;Sophie Gavarini;Benjamin Chanrion;Gérard Alonso

  • Interaction of Serotonin 5-Hydroxytryptamine Type 2C Receptors with PDZ10 of the Multi-PDZ Domain Protein MUPP1

    Carine Bécamel;Andrea Figge;Sebastian Poliak;Aline Dumuis

  • Pharmacology of 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A receptors which inhibit cAMP production in hippocampal and cortical neurons in primary culture.

    A Dumuis;M Sebben;J Bockaert

  • Regional distribution and ontogeny of 5-HT4 binding sites in rodent brain

    C. Waeber;M. Sebben;A. Nieoullon;J. Bockaert

Frequent Co-Authors

Joël Bockaert
Joël Bockaert University of Montpellier
Sylvie Claeysen
Sylvie Claeysen Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Jean-Philippe Pin
Jean-Philippe Pin University of Montpellier
Philippe Marin
Philippe Marin University of Montpellier
Evgeni Ponimaskin
Evgeni Ponimaskin Hannover Medical School
Eric Reiter
Eric Reiter François Rabelais University
Olivier J. Manzoni
Olivier J. Manzoni Aix-Marseille University
Diethelm W. Richter
Diethelm W. Richter University of Göttingen
Christian Waeber
Christian Waeber University College Cork
René Hen
René Hen Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering studying Biology or Biochemistry in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities in healthcare and science. Many students interested in these fields find value in specialized programs that offer practical skills and flexible learning options. For example, online ultrasound tech programs are a popular choice for those who want to enter the growing field of diagnostic medical imaging.

For a fast track into healthcare, students may look into 1 year radiology tech programs online. These programs provide a quicker route to certification and employment as radiologic technologists.

Other biology-related pathways include nutrition and healthcare assistance roles. Those passionate about health, food science, and public health could consider the best dietetics programs to become registered dietitians. Alternatively, if you are seeking entry-level roles with opportunities for advancement, online medical assistant programs that accept financial aid offer a flexible and cost-effective option.

Each pathway can complement a background in biology or biochemistry, providing practical skills for immediate employment or further specialization in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Aline Dumuis

Trending Scientists