World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
53
Citations
17952
World Ranking
3214
National Ranking
94

Ignasi Bartomeus publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ignasi Bartomeus sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 161 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Ignasi Bartomeus D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ignasi Bartomeus sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ignasi Bartomeus is affiliated with the Spanish National Research Council in Spain. Their academic contributions primarily focus on the intersection of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science.

The scientist's research spans several specialized subfields including Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Genetics, and Insect Science. Bartomeus has produced a substantial body of work with a particular emphasis on topics such as Plant and Animal Studies, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics, Plant Parasitism and Resistance, Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior, Insect and Pesticide Research, Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies, and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation.

The research output includes notable papers such as:

  • "Working landscapes need at least 20% native habitat," 2020, Conservation Letters
  • "A critical analysis of the potential for EU Common Agricultural Policy measures to support wild pollinators on farmland," 2020, Journal of Applied Ecology
  • "The potential and realized foraging movements of bees are differentially determined by body size and sociality," 2022, Ecology
  • "Crop pollination management needs flower-visitor monitoring and target values," 2020, Journal of Applied Ecology
  • "Field margin floral enhancements increase pollinator diversity at the field edge but show no consistent spillover into the crop field: a meta-analysis," 2020, Insect Conservation and Diversity

Bartomeus frequently collaborates with other researchers, with coauthor partnerships including Óscar Godoy, David Kleijn, Francisco P. Molina, Alfonso Allen-Perkins, and Blanca Arroyo-Correa.

Major venues for publication include Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Applied Ecology, Ecology Letters, and Ecosistemas.

Best Publications

  • Wild Pollinators Enhance Fruit Set of Crops Regardless of Honey Bee Abundance

    Lucas A Garibaldi;Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter;Rachael Winfree;Marcelo A Aizen

  • Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation

    David Kleijn;Rachael Winfree;Ignasi Bartomeus;Luísa G. Carvalheiro;Luísa G. Carvalheiro

  • Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination

    Romina Rader;Ignasi Bartomeus;Lucas A. Garibaldi;Michael P.D. Garratt

  • A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production

    Matteo Dainese;Emily A. Martin;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • Functional identity and diversity of animals predict ecosystem functioning better than species-based indices

    Vesna Gagic;Ignasio Bartomeus;Tomas Jonsson;Astrid Taylor

  • Native Pollinators in Anthropogenic Habitats

    Rachael Winfree;Ignasi Bartomeus;Daniel P. Cariveau

  • Climate-associated phenological advances in bee pollinators and bee-pollinated plants.

    Ignasi Bartomeus;John S. Ascher;David Wagner;Bryan N. Danforth

  • Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits

    Ignasi Bartomeus;John S. Ascher;John S. Ascher;Jason Gibbs;Bryan N. Danforth

  • The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe

    Emily A. Martin;Matteo Dainese;Yann Clough;András Báldi

  • Contrasting effects of invasive plants in plant-pollinator networks.

    Ignasi Bartomeus;Montserrat Vilà;Luís Santamaría

  • Contribution of insect pollinators to crop yield and quality varies with agricultural intensification.

    Ignasi Bartomeus;Simon G. Potts;Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter;Bernard E. Vaissière

  • Species turnover promotes the importance of bee diversity for crop pollination at regional scales.

    Rachael Winfree;James R. Reilly;Ignasi Bartomeus;Daniel P. Cariveau;Daniel P. Cariveau

  • Unraveling the Life History of Successful Invaders

    Daniel Sol;Joan Maspons;Miquel Vall-llosera;Ignasi Bartomeus

  • Biodiversity ensures plant–pollinator phenological synchrony against climate change

    Ignasi Bartomeus;Ignasi Bartomeus;Mia G. Park;Jason Gibbs;Jason Gibbs;Bryan N. Danforth

  • The potential for indirect effects between co-flowering plants via shared pollinators depends on resource abundance, accessibility and relatedness

    Luísa Gigante Carvalheiro;Luísa Gigante Carvalheiro;Jacobus Christiaan Biesmeijer;Jacobus Christiaan Biesmeijer;Gita Benadi;Jochen Fründ

  • Exploring or avoiding novel food resources? The novelty conflict in an invasive bird.

    Daniel Sol;Daniel Sol;Andrea S. Griffin;Ignasi Bartomeus;Hayley Boyce

  • Invasive plant integration into native plant–pollinator networks across Europe

    Montserrat Vilà;Ignasi Bartomeus;Anke C. Dietzsch;Theodora Petanidou

  • A common framework for identifying linkage rules across different types of interactions

    Ignasi Bartomeus;Dominique Gravel;Jason M. Tylianakis;Jason M. Tylianakis;Marcelo A. Aizen

  • Working landscapes need at least 20% native habitat

    Lucas Alejandro Garibaldi;Facundo José Oddi;Fernando E. Miguez;Ignasi Bartomeus

  • Urbanisation and the loss of phylogenetic diversity in birds

    Daniel Sol;Ignasi Bartomeus;César González-Lagos;Sandrine Pavoine

  • Native bees buffer the negative impact of climate warming on honey bee pollination of watermelon crops

    Romina Rader;James Reilly;Ignasi Bartomeus;Rachael Winfree

  • The winners and losers of land use intensification: pollinator community disassembly is non‐random and alters functional diversity

    Romina Rader;Romina Rader;Romina Rader;Ignasi Bartomeus;Jason M. Tylianakis;Jason M. Tylianakis;Etienne Laliberté

Frequent Co-Authors

Romina Rader
Romina Rader University of New England
Luísa G. Carvalheiro
Luísa G. Carvalheiro Universidade Federal de Goiás
Daniel Sol
Daniel Sol Spanish National Research Council
Riccardo Bommarco
Riccardo Bommarco Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Rachael Winfree
Rachael Winfree Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Andrea Holzschuh
Andrea Holzschuh University of Würzburg
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter University of Würzburg
Maj Rundlöf
Maj Rundlöf Lund University
Simon G. Potts
Simon G. Potts University of Reading
Montserrat Vilà
Montserrat Vilà Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens the door to a variety of online degree and career options, especially for those eager to blend science with real-world impact. Many students consider switching fields or pursuing further studies through flexible online programs. For instance, those with a bachelor’s degree in science but no formal nursing background might look into direct entry msn programs for non nurses online, rapidly gaining new skills for emerging healthcare and research careers.

Choosing the right institution is crucial. When comparing options, students often weigh factors such as accreditation, affordability, and reputation. If you’re not sure which school is better snhu vs wgu, thorough comparisons can help you determine the best fit for your goals and learning style.

Career advancement is another key consideration. Professionals looking to expand their qualifications efficiently might explore online bsn to msn programs to bridge their education and unlock higher-level scientific and administrative roles.

Lastly, for those who prioritize quality and ethical standards, attending a non profit university can ensure you receive a reputable education while maintaining trust and value in your academic investment.

Best Scientists Citing Ignasi Bartomeus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles