World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
39
Citations
11035
World Ranking
6250
National Ranking
493

Romina Rader publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Romina Rader sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Romina Rader D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Romina Rader sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Romina Rader is affiliated with the University of New England in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a total of 124 publications in this main area. Their research spans several subfields including Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science, Genetics, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

Their work primarily addresses topics such as Plant and Animal Studies, Insect and Pesticide Research, Plant Parasitism and Resistance, Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Insect-Plant Interactions and Control, and Bat Biology and Ecology Studies.

Among their recent papers are:

  • The Role of Flies as Pollinators of Horticultural Crops: An Australian Case Study with Worldwide Relevance (2020, Insects)
  • Wild insect diversity increases inter-annual stability in global crop pollinator communities (2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences)
  • How international journals can support ecology from the Global South (2021, Journal of Applied Ecology)
  • Self-compatible blueberry cultivars require fewer floral visits to maximize fruit production than a partially self-incompatible cultivar (2020, Journal of Applied Ecology)
  • Opportunities to reduce pollination deficits and address production shortfalls in an important insect-pollinated crop (2021, Ecological Applications)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Romina Rader include:

  • Manu E. Saunders
  • Karen C. B. S. Santos
  • Jamie R. Stavert
  • Liam Kendall
  • Jeremy Jones

Publication venues where Romina Rader has commonly published include:

  • Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
  • Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Basic and Applied Ecology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Ecological Solutions and Evidence

Best Publications

  • Wild Pollinators Enhance Fruit Set of Crops Regardless of Honey Bee Abundance

    Lucas A Garibaldi;Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter;Rachael Winfree;Marcelo A Aizen

  • Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation

    David Kleijn;Rachael Winfree;Ignasi Bartomeus;Luísa G. Carvalheiro;Luísa G. Carvalheiro

  • Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination

    Romina Rader;Ignasi Bartomeus;Lucas A. Garibaldi;Michael P.D. Garratt

  • A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production

    Matteo Dainese;Emily A. Martin;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • Summary for policymakers of the assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production

    Simon G. Potts;Vera Imperatriz Fonseca;Hien T. Ngo;Jacobus C. Biesmeijer

  • Alternative pollinator taxa are equally efficient but not as effective as the honeybee in a mass flowering crop

    Romina Rader;Romina Rader;Bradley G. Howlett;Saul A. Cunningham;David A. Westcott;David A. Westcott

  • The dimensionality of ecological networks

    Anna Eklöf;Ute Jacob;Jason Kopp;Jordi Bosch

  • The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

    Lawrence N. Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L.L. Hill;Samantha L.L. Hill

  • Non-Bee Insects as Visitors and Pollinators of Crops: Biology, Ecology and Management

    R Rader;S A Cunningham;B G Howlett;D W Inouye;D W Inouye

  • Native bees buffer the negative impact of climate warming on honey bee pollination of watermelon crops

    Romina Rader;James Reilly;Ignasi Bartomeus;Rachael Winfree

  • Small-scale urban agriculture results in high yields but requires judicious management of inputs to achieve sustainability

    Robert McDougall;Paul Kristiansen;Romina Rader

  • The winners and losers of land use intensification: pollinator community disassembly is non‐random and alters functional diversity

    Romina Rader;Romina Rader;Romina Rader;Ignasi Bartomeus;Jason M. Tylianakis;Jason M. Tylianakis;Etienne Laliberté

  • Linking species functional roles to their network roles.

    Camille Coux;Romina Rader;Ignasi Bartomeus;Jason M. Tylianakis;Jason M. Tylianakis

  • Pollen transport differs among bees and flies in a human-modified landscape

    Romina Rader;Romina Rader;Will Edwards;David A. Westcott;David A. Westcott;Saul A. Cunningham

  • Spatial and temporal variation in pollinator effectiveness: do unmanaged insects provide consistent pollination services to mass flowering crops?

    Romina Rader;Romina Rader;Bradley G. Howlett;Saul A. Cunningham;David A. Westcott;David A. Westcott

  • Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes : Effects of geographic and taxonomic biases

    Adriana De Palma;Adriana De Palma;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • The Role of Flies as Pollinators of Horticultural Crops: An Australian Case Study with Worldwide Relevance.

    David F Cook;Sasha C Voss;Jonathan T D Finch;Romina C Rader

  • Pollinator size and its consequences: Robust estimates of body size in pollinating insects

    Liam L.K. Kendall;Liam L.K. Kendall;Romina Rader;Vesna Gagic;Daniel D.P. Cariveau

  • Relationships between multiple biodiversity components and ecosystem services along a landscape complexity gradient

    Klaus Birkhofer;Klaus Birkhofer;Georg K.S. Andersson;Georg K.S. Andersson;Janne Bengtsson;Riccardo Bommarco

  • Pollinators, pests, and predators: Recognizing ecological trade-offs in agroecosystems

    Manu E. Saunders;Rebecca K. Peisley;Romina Rader;Gary W. Luck

  • Wild insect diversity increases inter-annual stability in global crop pollinator communities

    Deepa Senapathi;Jochen Fründ;Matthias Albrecht;Michael P.D. Garratt

  • A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production

    Matteo Dainese;Emily A. Martin;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

Frequent Co-Authors

Saul A. Cunningham
Saul A. Cunningham Australian National University
Ignasi Bartomeus
Ignasi Bartomeus Spanish National Research Council
Luísa G. Carvalheiro
Luísa G. Carvalheiro Universidade Federal de Goiás
Jason M. Tylianakis
Jason M. Tylianakis University of Canterbury
Teja Tscharntke
Teja Tscharntke University of Göttingen
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter University of Würzburg
Catrin Westphal
Catrin Westphal University of Göttingen
Marcelo A. Aizen
Marcelo A. Aizen National University of Comahue
Nick Reid
Nick Reid University of New England
Andrea Holzschuh
Andrea Holzschuh University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA, you may also be considering flexible learning paths and careers that intersect with science, research, and healthcare. Online degrees now make it easier for students and professionals to transition between related disciplines, upgrade credentials, or shift careers entirely.

Many learners are seeking accelerated options to jump-start their careers. For example, nurses interested in advancing their education can opt for a 6-month rn to bsn program or explore adn to np programs online to broaden their expertise. For those without a nursing background aiming for advanced healthcare roles, direct entry msn programs for non-nurses offer a direct route to leadership roles and expanded skillsets.

Choosing the right online institution is also crucial. Comparing program flexibility, accreditation, and student support can influence your success. Unsure where to start? Learn more about how various universities compare—like which school is better snhu vs wgu—by researching reputable reviews and student outcomes.

As the landscape of higher education evolves, these online pathways open doors for ecology and evolution students to leverage their science background in diverse and fulfilling careers.

Best Scientists Citing Romina Rader

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles