World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maj Rundlöf

Maj Rundlöf

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
56
Citations
20338
World Ranking
2774
National Ranking
74

Maj Rundlöf publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maj Rundlöf sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Maj Rundlöf D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maj Rundlöf sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maj Rundlöf is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and has contributed extensively to research within the Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work primarily spans insect science, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, genetics, plant science, and food science.

The areas of study Maj Rundlöf focuses on include:

  • Plant and animal studies
  • Insect and pesticide research
  • Insect and arachnid ecology and behavior
  • Plant parasitism and resistance
  • Insect-plant interactions and control
  • Ecology and vegetation dynamics studies
  • Agricultural safety and regulations

They have published papers in multiple prominent journals, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Journal of Applied Ecology
  • EFSA Journal
  • EFSA Supporting Publications
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Maj Rundlöf has collaborated regularly with a number of researchers, including:

  • Simon G. Potts
  • Matthias Albrecht
  • Henrik G. Smith
  • Jane C. Stout
  • Alexandra-Maria Klein

Some of their notable recent papers include:

  • The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis (2020, Ecology Letters)
  • Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees) (2023, EFSA Journal)
  • Crop diversity benefits carabid and pollinator communities in landscapes with semi-natural habitats (2020, Journal of Applied Ecology)
  • A critical analysis of the potential for EU Common Agricultural Policy measures to support wild pollinators on farmland (2020, Journal of Applied Ecology)
  • Pesticide use negatively affects bumble bees across European landscapes (2023, Nature)

Best Publications

  • Wild Pollinators Enhance Fruit Set of Crops Regardless of Honey Bee Abundance

    Lucas A Garibaldi;Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter;Rachael Winfree;Marcelo A Aizen

  • A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems

    Christina M. Kennedy;Eric Lonsdorf;Maile C. Neel;Neal M. Williams

  • Seed coating with a neonicotinoid insecticide negatively affects wild bees

    Maj Rundlöf;Georg K.S. Andersson;Riccardo Bommarco;Ingemar Fries

  • Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation

    David Kleijn;Rachael Winfree;Ignasi Bartomeus;Luísa G. Carvalheiro;Luísa G. Carvalheiro

  • Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination

    Romina Rader;Ignasi Bartomeus;Lucas A. Garibaldi;Michael P.D. Garratt

  • A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production

    Matteo Dainese;Emily A. Martin;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • Does conservation on farmland contribute to halting the biodiversity decline

    David Kleijn;Maj Rundlöf;Maj Rundlöf;Jeroen Scheper;Henrik G. Smith

  • The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe

    Emily A. Martin;Matteo Dainese;Yann Clough;András Báldi

  • The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis.

    Matthias Albrecht;David Kleijn;Neal M. Williams;Matthias Tschumi

  • Environmental factors driving the effectiveness of European agri‐environmental measures in mitigating pollinator loss – a meta‐analysis

    Jeroen Scheper;Andrea Holzschuh;Mikko Kuussaari;Simon G. Potts

  • A global synthesis of the effects of diversified farming systems on arthropod diversity within fields and across agricultural landscapes.

    Elinor M. Lichtenberg;Elinor M. Lichtenberg;Christina M. Kennedy;Claire Kremen;Péter Batáry

  • Neonicotinoid Insecticides and Their Impacts on Bees: A Systematic Review of Research Approaches and Identification of Knowledge Gaps.

    Ola Lundin;Maj Rundlöf;Henrik G. Smith;Ingemar Fries

  • Drastic historic shifts in bumble-bee community composition in Sweden

    Riccardo Bommarco;Ola Lundin;Henrik G. Smith;Maj Rundlöf

  • The effect of organic farming on butterfly diversity depends on landscape context

    Maj Rundlöf;Henrik Smith

  • Interacting effects of farming practice and landscape context on bumble bees

    Maj Rundlöf;Helena Nilsson;Henrik G. Smith

  • Local and landscape-level floral resources explain effects of wildflower strips on wild bees across four European countries

    Jeroen Scheper;Riccardo Bommarco;Andrea Holzschuh;Simon G. Potts

  • Mass‐flowering crops dilute pollinator abundance in agricultural landscapes across Europe

    Andrea Holzschuh;Matteo Dainese;Juan P. González‐Varo;Sonja Mudri‐Stojnić

  • The potential for indirect effects between co-flowering plants via shared pollinators depends on resource abundance, accessibility and relatedness

    Luísa Gigante Carvalheiro;Luísa Gigante Carvalheiro;Jacobus Christiaan Biesmeijer;Jacobus Christiaan Biesmeijer;Gita Benadi;Jochen Fründ

  • Meta-analysis reveals that pollinator functional diversity and abundance enhance crop pollination and yield

    Ben A. Woodcock;M. P. D. Garratt;G.D. Powney;R.F. Shaw

  • Optimizing agri-environment schemes for biodiversity, ecosystem services or both?

    Johan Ekroos;Ola Olsson;Maj Rundlöf;Maj Rundlöf;Frank Wätzold

  • Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees)

    Unknown

  • Late-season mass-flowering red clover increases bumble bee queen and male densities

    Maj Rundlöf;Maj Rundlöf;Anna S. Persson;Henrik G. Smith;Riccardo Bommarco

Frequent Co-Authors

Henrik G. Smith
Henrik G. Smith Lund University
Riccardo Bommarco
Riccardo Bommarco Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Luísa G. Carvalheiro
Luísa G. Carvalheiro Universidade Federal de Goiás
Simon G. Potts
Simon G. Potts University of Reading
Andrea Holzschuh
Andrea Holzschuh University of Würzburg
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter University of Würzburg
David Kleijn
David Kleijn Wageningen University & Research
Johan Ekroos
Johan Ekroos Lund University
Teja Tscharntke
Teja Tscharntke University of Göttingen
Ignasi Bartomeus
Ignasi Bartomeus Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degrees and interdisciplinary careers. Many students interested in ecology, evolutionary biology, or related fields also explore careers in healthcare, such as nursing, due to their strong scientific background. For those intrigued by this crossover, understanding the psych np salary across different states is essential for informed career planning. Compensation can vary significantly depending on location and specialization.

If you are considering advancing your nursing career rapidly, you may ask, how long to become a nurse practitioner? Some online programs can accelerate this journey, making it more accessible for those balancing work and study.

For registered nurses eager to expand their skills quickly, exploring a 6-month rn to bsn program provides a fast-tracked pathway. Additionally, those interested in advanced practice can benefit from flexible rn to np programs online that bridge the gap from associate degrees to graduate-level nursing.

These online pathways illustrate how foundational knowledge in ecology and evolution can support a broader scientific or healthcare career, offering flexibility and diverse opportunities for graduates.

Best Scientists Citing Maj Rundlöf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles