World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 38 6018 5593 432 416 167 4518

Jim Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jim Smith between 1958 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jim Smith published across 68 years, from 1958 to 2025, averaging 2.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2003. 6 of the 183 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1958 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2003. 1958: 1 publication 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1958 2025

183 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jim Smith: publications per year, 1958 to 2025
Year Publications
1958 1
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 2
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 4
1999 2
2000 11
2001 3
2002 5
2003 15
2004 9
2005 10
2006 3
2007 2
2008 2
2009 5
2010 7
2011 13
2012 9
2013 11
2014 6
2015 11
2016 13
2017 9
2018 7
2019 4
2020 1
2021 0
2022 3
2023 4
2024 2
2025 4
Total 183
Download as CSV

Jim Smith publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 167 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 167
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Jim Smith D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jim Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278 38
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Jim Smith is affiliated with Bond University in Australia and conducts research primarily within the fields of Medicine and Environmental Science. Their work spans varied subfields including Surgery, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their recent publications reflect a diverse research interest across ecosystem dynamics, fire history, surgical techniques, and cultural heritage. Notable papers include:

  • Vegetation dynamics models: a comprehensive set for natural resource assessment and planning in the United States (2021, Ecosphere)
  • Integration of vegetation classification with land cover mapping: lessons from regional mapping efforts in the Americas (2022, Vegetation Classification and Survey)
  • Single-stage nasal reconstruction with the islanded forehead flap (2020, Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery)
  • Contemporary (1984-2020) fire history metrics for the conterminous United States and ecoregional differences by land ownership (2022, International Journal of Wildland Fire)
  • Challenging Uncomfortableness: The Adaptive Reuse of Bendigo Gaol into Ulumbarra Theater and School (2023, Heritage & Society)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jim Smith include Kori Blankenship, Randy Swaty, Kimberly R. Hall, Sarah Hagen, and Kelly A. Pohl.

The venues where Jim Smith frequently publishes research are:

  • Ecosphere
  • Vegetation Classification and Survey
  • International Journal of Wildland Fire
  • Heritage & Society
  • Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery

Key topics addressed in their research are fire effects on ecosystems, rangeland and wildlife management, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, species distribution and climate change, fire dynamics and safety research, fire detection and safety systems, and cultural heritage management and preservation.

Their research contributions include exploration of fire history and ecosystem responses, advances in surgical methods, and integration of ecological classification systems for natural resource management. This multidisciplinary focus bridges environmental science and medicine, highlighting connections between ecological processes and human health and heritage conservation.

Best Publications

  • Life Cycle Critical Success Factors for Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects

    Junxiao Liu;Peter E. D. Love;Jim Smith;Michael Regan

  • BENCHMARKING, BENCHACTION, AND BENCHLEARNING: REWORK MITIGATION IN PROJECTS

    Peter E. D. Love;Jim Smith

  • Conceptual Framework for the Performance Measurement of Public-Private Partnerships

    Junxiao Liu;Peter E. D. Love;Peter R. Davis;Jim Smith

  • Modelling the dynamics of design error induced rework in construction

    Peter E. D. Love;Purnendu Mandal;Jim Smith;Heng Li

  • Public-Private Partnerships: A Review of Theory and Practice of Performance Measurement

    Junxiao Liu;Peter E.D. Love;Jim Smith;Michael Regan

  • Future Proofing PPPs: Life-Cycle Performance Measurement and Building Information Modelling

    Peter E.D. Love;Junxiao Liu;Jane Matthews;Chun Pong Sing

  • AdaptSTAR model: A climate-friendly strategy to promote built environment sustainability

    Sheila Conejos;Craig Langston;Jim Smith

  • Understanding the Landscape of Overruns in Transport Infrastructure Projects

    Peter E D Love;Jim Smith;Ian Simpson;Michael Regan

  • Impact of the Capital Market Collapse on Public-Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects

    Michael Regan;Michael Regan;Jim Smith;Jim Smith;Peter E. D. Love;Peter E. D. Love

  • Infrastructure procurement: Learning from private - public partnership experiences 'down under'

    Michael Regan;Jim Smith;Peter Love

  • A comparison of defects in houses constructed by owners and registered builders in the Australian State of Victoria

    Jim Georgiou;Peter Love;Jim Smith

  • Designing for better building adaptability: A comparison of adaptSTAR and ARP models

    Sheila Conejos;Craig Langston;Jim Smith

  • Divergence or Congruence? A Path Model of Rework for Building and Civil Engineering Projects

    Peter E. D. Love;David J. Edwards;Jim Smith;Derek H. T. Walker

  • Building Cost Planning for the Design Team

    Jim Smith;David Jaggar

  • Improving the implementation of adaptive reuse strategies for historic buildings

    Sheila Conejos;Craig Ashley Langston;Jim Smith

  • Stakeholder Management during Project Inception: Strategic Needs Analysis

    Jim Smith;Peter E. D. Love

  • The propagation of rework benchmark metrics for construction

    P. E.D. Love;J. Smith;Heng Li

  • Contract Documentation and the Incidence of Rework in Projects

    Peter E.D. Love;David J. Edwards;Jim Smith

  • Praxis of Performance Measurement in Public-Private Partnerships: Moving beyond the Iron Triangle

    Junxiao Liu;Peter E.D. Love;Jim Smith;Jane Matthews

  • Rework causation: Emergent theoretical insights and implications for research

    Peter E. D. Love;David J. Edwards;Jim Smith

  • Building Design Cost Management

    D. Jaggar;A. Ross;Jim Smith;Peter Love

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter E.D. Love
Peter E.D. Love Curtin University
David J. Edwards
David J. Edwards Birmingham City University
Fran Ackermann
Fran Ackermann Curtin University
Zahir Irani
Zahir Irani University of Bradford
Heng Li
Heng Li Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Xiangyu Wang
Xiangyu Wang Curtin University
Liyin Shen
Liyin Shen Chongqing University
David M. Holland
David M. Holland New York University
Keith W. Nicholls
Keith W. Nicholls Natural Environment Research Council
Nick Hajli
Nick Hajli Loughborough University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities can open doors to a wide range of flexible online degree options, tailored to fit diverse career goals and schedules. Many students are turning to accelerated online degree programs to fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner. These accelerated tracks can be particularly attractive for those eager to make a quick career transition or obtain advanced skills without spending years on campus.

For those interested in mental health, education, or social research, there are several specialized online degree options. Affordable programs are available for students seeking advanced credentials, such as the wide range of cheap psychology masters programs. For educators seeking leadership roles or administrative positions, enrolling in one of the fastest online edd programs is a practical path to gaining advanced knowledge in a condensed time frame.

Busy professionals and recent graduates alike can also pursue comprehensive one year masters programs online. These condensed programs are designed to help you upskill efficiently, making it easier to balance work, family, and study commitments while advancing in your chosen field.

Best Scientists Citing Jim Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles