World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Luísa G. Carvalheiro

Luísa G. Carvalheiro

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
43
Citations
16297
World Ranking
5188
National Ranking
93

Luísa G. Carvalheiro publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luísa G. Carvalheiro sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 94 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Luísa G. Carvalheiro D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luísa G. Carvalheiro sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luísa G. Carvalheiro is affiliated with the Universidade Federal de Goiás in Brazil. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science, with a significant focus on interdisciplinary studies related to ecology and insect science.

Their work encompasses various subfields including Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, and Genetics. This broad range underscores a multidisciplinary approach to understanding ecological and biological systems.

Main topics investigated by Luísa G. Carvalheiro involve:

  • Plant and animal studies
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Simon G. Potts
  • David Kleijn
  • Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez
  • Tereza Cristina Giannini
  • M. M. Maués

Luísa G. Carvalheiro has contributed research to prominent publication venues such as:

  • Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
  • Journal of Applied Ecology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Recent papers published by this researcher include:

  • Wild insect diversity increases inter-annual stability in global crop pollinator communities, 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Soil-derived Nature's Contributions to People and their contribution to the UN Sustainable Development Goals, 2021, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Forest and connectivity loss simplify tropical pollination networks, 2020, Oecologia
  • Key tropical crops at risk from pollinator loss due to climate change and land use, 2023, Science Advances
  • Virtual pollination trade uncovers global dependence on biodiversity of developing countries, 2021, Science Advances

Best Publications

  • Wild Pollinators Enhance Fruit Set of Crops Regardless of Honey Bee Abundance

    Lucas A Garibaldi;Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter;Rachael Winfree;Marcelo A Aizen

  • A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems

    Christina M. Kennedy;Eric Lonsdorf;Maile C. Neel;Neal M. Williams

  • Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits

    Lucas A. Garibaldi;Lucas A. Garibaldi;Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter;Claire Kremen;Juan M. Morales

  • Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation

    David Kleijn;Rachael Winfree;Ignasi Bartomeus;Luísa G. Carvalheiro;Luísa G. Carvalheiro

  • Non-bee insects are important contributors to global crop pollination

    Romina Rader;Ignasi Bartomeus;Lucas A. Garibaldi;Michael P.D. Garratt

  • A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production

    Matteo Dainese;Emily A. Martin;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition

    Daniel S. Karp;Rebecca E Chaplin-Kramer;Timothy D. Meehan;Emily A. Martin

  • From research to action: Enhancing crop yield through wild pollinators

    Lucas A Garibaldi;Luísa G Carvalheiro;Luísa G Carvalheiro;Sara D Leonhardt;Marcelo A Aizen

  • Mutually beneficial pollinator diversity and crop yield outcomes in small and large farms

    Lucas A. Garibaldi;Luísa G. Carvalheiro;Bernard E. Vaissière;Barbara Gemmill-Herren

  • Species richness declines and biotic homogenisation have slowed down for NW-European pollinators and plants

    Luísa Gigante Carvalheiro;Luísa Gigante Carvalheiro;William E. Kunin;Petr Keil;Petr Keil;Jesus Aguirre-Gutiérrez

  • Natural and within‐farmland biodiversity enhances crop productivity

    Luísa Gigante Carvalheiro;Ruan Veldtman;Awraris Getachew Shenkute;Gebreamlak Bezabih Tesfay

  • A global synthesis of the effects of diversified farming systems on arthropod diversity within fields and across agricultural landscapes.

    Elinor M. Lichtenberg;Elinor M. Lichtenberg;Christina M. Kennedy;Claire Kremen;Péter Batáry

  • Pollination services decline with distance from natural habitat even in biodiversity-rich areas

    Luísa G. Carvalheiro;Colleen L. Seymour;Ruan Veldtman;Susan W. Nicolson

  • Fit-for-purpose: species distribution model performance depends on evaluation criteria - Dutch Hoverflies as a case study.

    Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez;Jesús Aguirre-Gutiérrez;Luísa G. Carvalheiro;Luísa G. Carvalheiro;Chiara Polce;E. Emiel van Loon

  • The potential for indirect effects between co-flowering plants via shared pollinators depends on resource abundance, accessibility and relatedness

    Luísa Gigante Carvalheiro;Luísa Gigante Carvalheiro;Jacobus Christiaan Biesmeijer;Jacobus Christiaan Biesmeijer;Gita Benadi;Jochen Fründ

  • Pollinator conservation - The difference between managing for pollination services and preserving pollinator diversity

    Deepa Senapathi;Jacobus C Biesmeijer;Thomas D Breeze;David Kleijn

  • The impact of over 80 years of land cover changes on bee and wasp pollinator communities in England

    Deepa Senapathi;Luísa G. Carvalheiro;Luísa G. Carvalheiro;Jacobus C. Biesmeijer;Cassie Ann Dodson

  • Creating patches of native flowers facilitates crop pollination in large agricultural fields: mango as a case study

    Luísa G. Carvalheiro;Colleen L. Seymour;Susan W. Nicolson;Ruan Veldtman

  • Trait matching of flower visitors and crops predicts fruit set better than trait diversity

    Lucas A. Garibaldi;Ignasi Bartomeus;Riccardo Bommarco;Alexandra M. Klein

  • Economic and ecological implications of geographic bias in pollinator ecology in the light of pollinator declines

    C. R. Archer;C. W. W. Pirk;L. G. Carvalheiro;L. G. Carvalheiro;S. W. Nicolson

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon G. Potts
Simon G. Potts University of Reading
Lucas A. Garibaldi
Lucas A. Garibaldi National Scientific and Technical Research Council
Maj Rundlöf
Maj Rundlöf Lund University
Riccardo Bommarco
Riccardo Bommarco Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Andrea Holzschuh
Andrea Holzschuh University of Würzburg
Claire Kremen
Claire Kremen University of British Columbia
David Kleijn
David Kleijn Wageningen University & Research
Teja Tscharntke
Teja Tscharntke University of Göttingen
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter University of Würzburg
Rufus Isaacs
Rufus Isaacs Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students of Ecology and Evolution, related online degrees in nursing offer flexible options for those interested in both natural sciences and healthcare. Many professionals explore online degree programs to pivot or advance in fast-growing fields, such as nurse practitioner roles. If you’re keen on a quicker route, fast track nurse practitioner programs can help accelerate your career progress.

Registered nurses seeking advancement may benefit from rn to bsn 6 months programs, which compress traditional coursework into a shorter time frame. Additionally, nurses holding an associate degree can consider asn to fnp programs that provide a pathway from entry-level nursing up to advanced practice roles like Family Nurse Practitioner.

Salary prospects can vary widely depending on specialization and location. Exploring compensation data—such as pmhnp salary by state—can inform your decisions as you consider the link between advanced degrees and career outcomes. These resources help aspiring professionals make informed choices about their next steps in healthcare or allied science fields.

Best Scientists Citing Luísa G. Carvalheiro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles