World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bruno Cassiman

Bruno Cassiman

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 34 2248 2117 21 20 126 15015

Bruno Cassiman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bruno Cassiman between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bruno Cassiman published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2007. 6 of the 142 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2007. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 5 publications
1992 2025

142 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bruno Cassiman: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 1
1998 3
1999 4
2000 5
2001 2
2002 10
2003 5
2004 5
2005 8
2006 10
2007 12
2008 3
2009 7
2010 6
2011 8
2012 6
2013 4
2014 4
2015 4
2016 4
2017 4
2018 5
2019 0
2020 3
2021 2
2022 4
2023 4
2024 1
2025 5
Total 142
Download as CSV

Bruno Cassiman publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Cassiman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 125–129 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 126 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93 126
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Bruno Cassiman D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Cassiman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135 34
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Bruno Cassiman is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium and has contributed primarily to the field of Business, Management and Accounting through research focused on strategy and management. Their work addresses various aspects of innovation, economic growth, and firm performance within digital and corporate contexts.

The scientist's recent publication record includes papers in notable venues such as Strategy Science, Academy of Management Proceedings, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Management Science. Some key papers authored or co-authored by them are:

  • Commitment and Competitive Advantage in a Digital World, 2022, Strategy Science
  • Strategy Through a Ghemawat Lens: Honoring and Building on the Contributions of Pankaj Ghemawat, 2022, Strategy Science

Other recent papers by collaborators within the research network, reflecting related themes of technology and firm performance, include:

  • Position and Differentiation of Firms in Technology Space, 2023, Management Science
  • Technology Differentiation and Firm Performance, 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • How is Corporate R&D Changing? Recent Research on Trends Affecting the Nature of Corporate R&D, 2020, Academy of Management Proceedings

The primary research topics Cassiman has engaged with include:

  • Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
  • ICT Impact and Policies

Within the broader field of Business, Management and Accounting, the scientist's subfields of study cover:

  • Strategy and Management
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Media Technology
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Frequent co-authors contributing to Cassiman's body of work include:

  • Sam Arts
  • Jianan Hou
  • Yuan Shi
  • Rachelle C. Sampson
  • Sharon Belenzon

The scientist has published extensively in venues such as Academy of Management Proceedings, Strategy Science, and SSRN Electronic Journal among others, reflecting a consistent focus on topics relating to innovation management, business strategy, and the evolving economic context of corporate activity.

Best Publications

  • In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition

    Bruno Cassiman;Reinhilde Veugelers

  • R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium

    Bruno Cassiman;Reinhilde Veugelers

  • Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms

    Reinhilde Veugelers;Bruno Cassiman

  • R&D cooperation between firms and universities. Some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing

    Reinhilde Veugelers;Reinhilde Veugelers;Bruno Cassiman;Bruno Cassiman

  • Innovation and internationalization through exports

    Bruno Cassiman;Bruno Cassiman;Bruno Cassiman;Elena Golovko

  • THE IMPACT OF M&A ON THE R&D PROCESS. AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF TECHNOLOGICAL AND MARKET RELATEDNESS

    Bruno Cassiman;Bruno Cassiman;Massimo G. Colombo;Paola Garrone;Reinhilde Veugelers;Reinhilde Veugelers

  • Innovation, exports and productivity

    Bruno Cassiman;Elena Golovko;Ester Martínez-Ros

  • Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners

    René Belderbos;René Belderbos;Bruno Cassiman;Bruno Cassiman;Bruno Cassiman;Driems Faems;Driems Faems;Bart Leten

  • Open innovation: Are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary?

    Bruno Cassiman;Giovanni Valentini

  • Foreign subsidiaries as a channel of international technology diffusion: Some direct firm level evidence from Belgium

    Reinhilde Veugelers;Reinhilde Veugelers;Bruno Cassiman

  • Optimal Project Rejection and New Firm Start-ups

    Bruno Cassiman;Masako Ueda

  • In search of performance effects of (in)direct industry-science links

    Bruno Cassiman;Reinhilde Veugelers;Pluvia Zuniga

  • The degree of spillovers and the number of rivals for maximum effective R &D

    Raymond De Bondt;Patrick Slaets;Bruno Cassiman

  • Complementarity in the innovation strategy: Internal R&D, external technology acquisition, and cooperation in R&D

    Bruno Cassiman;Reinhilde Veugelers

  • Organising R&D Projects to Profit From Innovation: Insights From Co-opetition

    Bruno Cassiman;Maria Chiara Di Guardo;Giovanni Valentini

  • Complementarity in the Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D, External Technology Acquisition and Cooperation

    Bruno Cassiman;Reinhilde Veugelers

  • Text matching to measure patent similarity

    Sam Arts;Bruno Cassiman;Juan Carlos Gomez

  • Exploring the scope of open innovation: a bibliometric review of a decade of research

    Adrián Kovács;Bart Looy;Bruno Cassiman

  • Endogenizing know-how flows through the nature of R&D investments

    Bruno Cassiman;David Pérez-Castrillo;Reinhilde Veugelers;Reinhilde Veugelers

  • Organizing links with science: Cooperate or contract?: A project-level analysis

    Bruno Cassiman;Maria Chiara Di Guardo;Giovanni Valentini

Frequent Co-Authors

Bart Van Looy
Bart Van Looy KU Leuven
Massimo G. Colombo
Massimo G. Colombo Polytechnic University of Milan
Pankaj Ghemawat
Pankaj Ghemawat University of Navarra
Dries Faems
Dries Faems WHU-Otto Beisheim School of Management
Keld Laursen
Keld Laursen Copenhagen Business School
Alfonso Gambardella
Alfonso Gambardella Bocconi University
David Pérez-Castrillo
David Pérez-Castrillo Autonomous University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Business and Management opens doors to a wide range of online educational opportunities and career options. For those interested in advancing to top leadership roles, considering an online PhD in organizational leadership can equip you with advanced strategic skills and credentials valued in many industries.

It's essential to choose a program that is recognized for its quality. Enrolling in nationally accredited colleges ensures that your degree is respected by employers and can help with credit transfer opportunities or licensure considerations.

For those looking to quickly enter specialized fields, there are flexible, fast-paced options available. The fastest online construction management degree programs are ideal for aspiring managers in engineering or the building industry, while a healthcare administration online degree prepares students for dynamic roles in hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare settings.

Whether you want to lead organizations, manage complex projects, or oversee healthcare operations, online degrees in these areas provide flexibility and direct pathways to rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno Cassiman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles