What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Management
- Marketing
- Social science
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Open innovation, Knowledge management, Marketing, Industrial organization and Knowledge Search.
The concepts of his Open innovation study are interwoven with issues in Project management, Operations management and Scope.
His work deals with themes such as Developing country, Knowledge sources and Change management, which intersect with Scope.
His study in the field of Innovation management and Innovation intermediary is also linked to topics like Key and Focus.
His studies deal with areas such as Empirical research, Function and Embeddedness as well as Marketing.
He combines subjects such as Entrepreneurship and Revenue with his study of Industrial organization.
His most cited work include:
- Open innovation : researching a new paradigm (2376 citations)
- Open innovation: The next decade (483 citations)
- Open innovation: The next decade (483 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Open innovation, Industrial organization, Knowledge management, Marketing and Innovation management.
Wim Vanhaverbeke works mostly in the field of Open innovation, limiting it down to topics relating to Process and, in certain cases, Process management.
His studies examine the connections between Industrial organization and genetics, as well as such issues in Clique, with regards to Liability.
His work in the fields of Absorptive capacity overlaps with other areas such as Key.
His research integrates issues of Developing country, Knowledge sources, Dimension, Knowledge Search and Empirical research in his study of Marketing.
The various areas that Wim Vanhaverbeke examines in his Knowledge Search study include Data science and Boundary spanning.
He most often published in these fields:
- Open innovation (96.43%)
- Industrial organization (54.29%)
- Knowledge management (44.29%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Open innovation (96.43%)
- Knowledge management (44.29%)
- Industrial organization (54.29%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Open innovation, Knowledge management, Industrial organization, Innovation management and Process management.
His Open innovation study improves the overall literature in Marketing.
His study in Marketing is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Entrepreneurial culture, Value and Multitude.
His studies in Knowledge management integrate themes in fields like New business development, Qualitative research, Position and Value.
His Industrial organization research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Value capture, Private sector, Commerce and Public policy.
His Innovation management research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Competitive advantage, Needs assessment and Risk management.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- How start-ups successfully organize and manage open innovation with large companies (45 citations)
- Managing Open Innovation in SMEs (29 citations)
- A Systematic Review of the Literature on Open Innovation in SMEs (18 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Management
- Social science
- Marketing
Wim Vanhaverbeke mostly deals with Open innovation, Knowledge management, Innovation management, Industrial organization and Business model.
He integrates many fields in his works, including Open innovation and Autonomy.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Empirical evidence, Stakeholder theory, Stakeholder, Value and Process.
His work deals with themes such as Knowledge sharing and Knowledge engineering, which intersect with Process.
He regularly ties together related areas like Commerce in his Industrial organization studies.
His studies deal with areas such as Field, Exploratory research, Order and Liability as well as Entrepreneurship.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
