World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
36
Citations
9124
World Ranking
2040
National Ranking
67

Dries Faems publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dries Faems sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 155 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Dries Faems D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dries Faems sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dries Faems is affiliated with the WHU-Otto Beisheim School of Management in Germany. Their research focuses on various aspects within the field of Business, Management and Accounting, with a particular emphasis on Strategy and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, and Marketing.

The main topics addressed in their work include Innovation and Knowledge Management, Innovation Policy and R&D, Management and Organizational Studies, Family Business Performance and Succession, Business Strategy and Innovation, Innovation and Socioeconomic Development, and Economic and Technological Innovation.

Faems has contributed multiple scholarly articles to prominent publication venues. Frequent publication outlets include Research Policy, Academy of Management Proceedings, Journal of Management Studies, R and D Management, and Journal of Product Innovation Management.

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Moving forward quantitative research on innovation management: a call for an inductive turn on using and presenting quantitative research, 2020, R and D Management
  • Should SMEs get out of the building? Examining the role of customer co-creation on radical organizational creativity, 2020, R and D Management
  • Ties that matter: The impact of alliance partner knowledge recombination novelty on knowledge utilization in R&D alliances, 2020, Research Policy
  • Managing Technological, Sociopolitical, and Institutional Change in the New Normal, 2020, Journal of Management Studies
  • Theorizing Diversity in Management Studies: New Perspectives and Future Directions, 2021, Journal of Management Studies

Faems frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Holmer Kok, Pedro de Faria, David Ahlström, Jean-Luc Arrègle, and Michael A. Hitt.

Best Publications

  • Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach

    Dries Faems;Bart Van Looy;Koenraad Debackere

  • Toward An Integrative Perspective on Alliance Governance: Connecting Contract Design, Trust Dynamics, and Contract Application

    Dries Faems;Maddy Janssens;Anoop Madhok;Anoop Madhok;Bart Van Looy

  • Book review: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm / by H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West. - Oxford University Press. - ISBN 978-0-19929072-7

    Dries Faems

  • Technology Alliance Portfolios and Financial Performance: Value-Enhancing and Cost-Increasing Effects of Open Innovation*

    Dries Faems;Matthias de Visser;Petra Andries;Bart Van Looy

  • Coopetition and product innovation performance : The role of internal knowledge sharing mechanisms and formal knowledge protection mechanisms

    Isabel Estrada;Dries Faems;Pedro de Faria

  • Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners

    René Belderbos;René Belderbos;Bruno Cassiman;Bruno Cassiman;Bruno Cassiman;Driems Faems;Driems Faems;Bart Leten

  • Technological Activities and Their Impact on the Financial Performance of the Firm: Exploitation and Exploration within and between Firms*

    Rene Belderbos;Dries Faems;Bart Leten;Bart Van Looy

  • Unravelling the HRM–Performance Link: Value-Creating and Cost-Increasing Effects of Small Business HRM*

    Luc Sels;Sophie De Winne;Johan Maes;Jeroen Delmotte

  • Linking HRM and small business performance: An examination of the impact of HRM intensity on the productivity and financial performance of small businesses

    Luc Sels;Sophie De Winne;Jeroen Delmotte;Johan Maes

  • Managing Technological, Sociopolitical, and Institutional Change in the New Normal

    David Ahlstrom;Jean-Luc Arregle;Michael A. Hitt;Gongming Qian

  • Structural ambidexterity in NPD processes: A firm-level assessment of the impact of differentiated structures on innovation performance

    Matthias de Visser;Petronella C. de Weerd-Nederhof;D.L.M. Faems;Michael Song

  • Toward a Dynamic Perspective on Open Innovation: A Longitudinal Assessment of the Adoption of Internal and External Innovation Strategies in the Netherlands

    Tom Poot;Dries Faems;Wim Vanhaverbeke

  • Patenting Activities and Firm Performance: Does Firm Size Matter?

    Unknown

  • The effect of individual HR domains on financial performance: Evidence from Belgian small businesses

    Dries Faems;L Sels;S De Winne;J Maes

  • The impact of continuous and discontinuous alliance strategies on startup innovation performance

    Inge Neyens;Dries Faems;Luc Sels

  • R&D manpower and technological performance: The impact of demographic and task-related diversity

    D.L.M. Faems;A. Subramaniam

  • Toward a dynamic perspective on open innovation: A longitudinal assessment of the adoption of internal and external innovation strategies in the Netherlands

    T. Poot;D.L.M. Faems;W. Vanhaverbeke;J. Tidd

  • The role of interpartner dissimilarities in Industry-University alliances : Insights from a comparative case study

    Isabel Estrada Vaquero;Dries Faems;Natalia Martin-Cruz;M Pilar Perez-Santana

  • The Initiation and Evolution of Interfirm Knowledge Transfer in R&D Relationships

    Dries Faems;Maddy Janssens;Bart van Looy

  • Alliance Portfolios and Innovation Performance: Connecting Structural and Managerial Perspectives

    Dries Faems;Maddy Janssens;Inge Neyens

  • Managing the Co-operation–Competition Dilemma in R&D Alliances: A Multiple Case Study in the Advanced Materials Industry

    Dries Faems;Maddy Janssens;Bart Van Looy

  • Linking Hrm and Small Business Performance: An Examination of the Impact of Hrm Intensity on the Productivity and Financial Performance of Small Businesses

    Jeroen Delmotte;Johan Maes;Dries Faems;Anneleen Forrier

Frequent Co-Authors

Bart Van Looy
Bart Van Looy KU Leuven
Luc Sels
Luc Sels KU Leuven
Wim Vanhaverbeke
Wim Vanhaverbeke University of Antwerp
Anoop Madhok
Anoop Madhok York University
Bart Nooteboom
Bart Nooteboom University of Groningen
Igor Filatotchev
Igor Filatotchev King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management doesn’t just mean traditional, in-person study. Today, there are a wide range of affordable online masters programs available, making it easier than ever to earn advanced credentials without breaking the bank. These programs offer flexibility for working professionals and students balancing other commitments.

As technology transforms the business landscape, specialized degrees such as the cheapest online data science masters can enhance your skillset in data-driven decision-making—a critical asset in modern enterprises.

For those seeking leadership roles or academic careers, pursuing a phd in organizational leadership online is a cost-effective pathway to the highest level of expertise in management and organizational strategy.

It’s vital to choose a school with recognized credentials. Research the nationally accredited colleges to ensure your degree is respected and valued by employers nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Dries Faems

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles