World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen

Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
35
Citations
6301
World Ranking
2189
National Ranking
28

Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 150 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen is affiliated with the University of Oulu in Finland and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of Business, Management and Accounting. Their work spans several subfields including Strategy and Management, Marketing, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, and Communication.

Their research focuses on multiple interconnected topics such as Innovation and Knowledge Management, International Business and Foreign Direct Investment, Service and Product Innovation, Knowledge Management and Sharing, Digital Marketing and Social Media, Management and Organizational Studies, and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Adaptive learning in cross-sector collaboration during global emergency: conceptual insights in the context of COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Multinational Business Review
  • Orchestrating innovation networks: Alignment and orchestration profile approach, 2021, Journal of Business Research
  • The dark side of open innovation: Individual affective responses as hidden tolls of the paradox of openness, 2021, Journal of Business Research
  • How to Appropriate Value from General-Purpose Technology by Applying Open Innovation, 2021, California Management Review
  • Distinguishing between appropriability and appropriation: A systematic review and a renewed conceptual framing, 2021, Research Policy

Frequently publishing in prominent venues, Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen's work appears often in the International Journal of Innovation Management, Academy of Management Proceedings, Technovation, Journal of Business Research, and Innovation.

Collaborations with other researchers play a significant role in their work. Frequent co-authors include Jialei Yang, Lauri Haapanen, Ahmad Arslan, Ioana Stefan, and Wim Vanhaverbeke, reflecting a sustained engagement with scholars active in innovation and management research.

Best Publications

  • Incremental and Radical Innovation in Coopetition—The Role of Absorptive Capacity and Appropriability

    Paavo Ritala;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen

  • What's in it for me? Creating and appropriating value in innovation-related coopetition

    Paavo Ritala;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen

  • Playing the collaboration game right—balancing trust and contracting

    Kirsimarja Blomqvist;Pia Hurmelinna;Risto Seppänen

  • Nature and dynamics of appropriability: strategies for appropriating returns on innovation

    Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Kaisu Puumalainen

  • Appropriability regime for radical and incremental innovations

    Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Liisa-Maija Sainio;Tiina Jauhiainen

  • Intellectual capital in service‐ and product‐oriented companies

    Aino Kianto;Pia Hurmelinna‐Laukkanen;Paavo Ritala

  • Constituents of radical innovation—exploring the role of strategic orientations and market uncertainty

    Liisa-Maija Sainio;Paavo Ritala;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen

  • Orchestrating R&D networks: Absorptive capacity, network stability, and innovation appropriability

    Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Heidi Olander;Kirsimarja Blomqvist;Victoria Panfilii

  • The role of trust and contracts in the internationalization of technology-intensive Born Globals

    Kirsimarja Blomqvist;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Niina Nummela;Sami Saarenketo

  • The Janus face of the appropriability regime in the protection of innovations: Theoretical re-appraisal and empirical analysis

    Unknown

  • Tug of war in innovation - coopetitive service development

    Paavo Ritala;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Kirsimarja Blomqvist

  • Enabling collaborative innovation – knowledge protection for knowledge sharing

    Pia Hurmelinna‐Laukkanen

  • Orchestrator types, roles and capabilities – A framework for innovation networks

    Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Satu Nätti

  • Coping with rivals’ absorptive capacity in innovation activities

    Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Heidi Olander

  • Managing the appropriability of R&D collaboration

    Kaisa Henttonen;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Paavo Ritala

  • The dynamics of relational and contractual governance mechanisms in knowledge sharing of collaborative R&D projects

    Heidi Olander;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Kirsimarja Blomqvist;Paavo Ritala

  • WHAT'S SMALL SIZE GOT TO DO WITH IT? PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL ASSETS IN SMEs

    Heidi Olander;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Jukka Mähönen

  • Coordination in innovation‐generating business networks – the case of Finnish Mobile TV development

    Paavo Ritala;Pia Hurmelinna‐Laukkanen;Satu Nätti

  • Protection for profiting from collaborative service innovation

    Pia Hurmelinna‐Laukkanen;Paavo Ritala

  • Orchestrating innovation networks: Alignment and orchestration profile approach

    Unknown

  • Constituents and outcomes of absorptive capacity – appropriability regime changing the game

    Pia Hurmelinna‐Laukkanen

  • Absorptive capacity and network orchestration in innovation communities – promoting service innovation

    Satu Nätti;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Wesley J. Johnston

  • DO SMEs BENEFIT FROM HRM-RELATED KNOWLEDGE PROTECTION IN INNOVATION MANAGEMENT?

    Heidi Olander;Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen;Pia Heilmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Paavo Ritala
Paavo Ritala Lappeenranta University of Technology
Kirsimarja Blomqvist
Kirsimarja Blomqvist Lappeenranta University of Technology
Kaisu Puumalainen
Kaisu Puumalainen Lappeenranta University of Technology
Wim Vanhaverbeke
Wim Vanhaverbeke University of Antwerp
Sami Saarenketo
Sami Saarenketo Lappeenranta University of Technology
Ismail Golgeci
Ismail Golgeci University of Auckland
Zaheer Khan
Zaheer Khan University of Aberdeen
Aino Kianto
Aino Kianto Lappeenranta University of Technology
Kristian Möller
Kristian Möller Aalto University
Ilan Alon
Ilan Alon Ariel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring business and management in the USA opens doors to a wide array of online degree options and professional pathways. Many students seek niche management roles by pursuing a construction management masters degree online, gaining specialized skills for overseeing complex building projects.

For experienced professionals aiming to move into executive or senior leadership, an online executive mba offers flexible learning while developing high-level strategic skills needed for C-suite roles.

Affordability is a crucial factor. Prospective students can compare diverse affordable graduate schools that offer respected business and management degrees without the burden of excessive student debt.

Additionally, the growing importance of data-driven decision-making is pushing many business students toward top data science programs, equipping them for in-demand roles in data analytics and business intelligence.

Best Scientists Citing Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen

Trending Scientists