World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 77 18542 17421 9235 8532 414 18511

Mark K. Ferguson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark K. Ferguson between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark K. Ferguson published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 9.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2023. 22 of the 479 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2023. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 4 publications 1986: 13 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 13 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 44 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 8 publications
1977 2025

479 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark K. Ferguson: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 1
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 2
1983 0
1984 1
1985 4
1986 13
1987 7
1988 13
1989 10
1990 9
1991 7
1992 5
1993 11
1994 9
1995 7
1996 8
1997 8
1998 4
1999 7
2000 7
2001 2
2002 4
2003 12
2004 5
2005 3
2006 9
2007 13
2008 20
2009 18
2010 14
2011 17
2012 15
2013 17
2014 21
2015 12
2016 22
2017 16
2018 7
2019 9
2020 21
2021 12
2022 9
2023 44
2024 14
2025 8
Total 479
Download as CSV

Mark K. Ferguson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark K. Ferguson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 414 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 414
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark K. Ferguson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark K. Ferguson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730 77
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark K. Ferguson is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with notable contributions in several subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Geriatrics and Gerontology.

Their work covers a range of topics, with publications focusing on Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Frailty in Older Adults, Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases, Hip and Femur Fractures, Nutrition and Health in Aging, Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes, and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations.

Recent papers by Mark K. Ferguson include:

  • CDKN2A loss-of-function predicts immunotherapy resistance in non-small cell lung cancer, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Risk Prediction Model of 90-Day Mortality After Esophagectomy for Cancer, 2021, JAMA Surgery
  • Clinical predictors of donor antibody titre and correlation with recipient antibody response in a COVID-19 convalescent plasma clinical trial, 2020, Journal of Internal Medicine
  • Use of fibrinolytics and deoxyribonuclease in adult patients with pleural empyema: a consensus statement, 2021, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • Multilevel Body Composition Analysis on Chest Computed Tomography Predicts Hospital Length of Stay and Complications After Lobectomy for Lung Cancer, 2020, Annals of Surgery

Frequent co-authors of Ferguson include:

  • Jessica Donington
  • Maria Lucia L. Madariaga
  • Darren S. Bryan
  • Megan Huisingh-Scheetz
  • Andy Chao Hsuan Lee

Ferguson has published multiple articles in notable venues, with repeated contributions to The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), JAMA Surgery, JAMA Network Open, and Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery.

In addition to journal articles, Ferguson has authored books published by several publishers. These include:

  • Thoracic Surgery Atlas (Elsevier BV, 2023)
  • Difficult Decisions in Trauma Surgery (Difficult decisions in surgery: an evidence-based approach, 2021)
  • Tratado de Cirurgia Torácica (Even3 Publicações eBooks, 2024)

Best Publications

  • ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines on fitness for radical therapy in lung cancer patients (surgery and chemo-radiotherapy)

    Alessandro Brunelli;Anne Charloux;Chris Thomas Bolliger;Gaetano Rocco

  • Cancer of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction: An Eighth Edition Staging Primer.

    Thomas W. Rice;Hemant Ishwaran;Mark K. Ferguson;Eugene H. Blackstone

  • Consensus Statements for Management of Barrett's Dysplasia and Early-Stage Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Based on a Delphi Process

    Cathy Bennett;Nimish Vakil;Jacques Bergman;Rebecca Harrison

  • Diffusing capacity predicts morbidity and mortality after pulmonary resection.

    Mark K. Ferguson;Louise Little;Louis Rizzo;Keith J. Popovich

  • Selection of operation for esophageal cancer based on staging.

    David B. Skinner;Alex G. Little;Mark K. Ferguson;Arturo Soriano

  • Preoperative prediction of the risk of pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for cancer.

    Mark K. Ferguson;Amy E. Durkin

  • Adult Skin Wounds in the Fetal Environment Heal with Scar Formation

    Michael Longaker;David Whitby;Mark Ferguson;H. Lorenz

  • The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines

    G. Zaninotto;C. Bennett;G. Boeckxstaens;M. Costantini

  • Safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgical techniques for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax

    Keith S. Naunheim;Michael J. Mack;Steven R. Hazelrigg;Mark K. Ferguson

  • American College of Chest Physicians and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Consensus Statement for Evaluation and Management for High-Risk Patients With Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

    Jessica Donington;Mark Ferguson;Peter Mazzone;John Handy

  • Preoperative Assessment of Pulmonary Risk

    Mark K. Ferguson

  • Sleeve lobectomy or pneumonectomy: optimal management strategy using decision analysis techniques.

    Mark K Ferguson;Amy G Lehman

  • Complete Barrett's eradication endoscopic mucosal resection: an effective treatment modality for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma--an American single-center experience.

    Jennifer Chennat;Vani J A Konda;Andrew S Ross;Alberto Herreros de Tejada

  • Optimizing selection of patients for major lung resection

    Mark K. Ferguson;Laurie B. Reeder;Rosemarie Mick

  • Diagnosis and management of synchronous lung cancers.

    Mark K. Ferguson;Tom R. DeMeester;Jean DesLauriers;Alex G. Little

  • Diffusing capacity predicts morbidity after lung resection in patients without obstructive lung disease.

    Mark K. Ferguson;Wickii T. Vigneswaran

  • Ethnic Differences and Functional Analysis of MET Mutations in Lung Cancer

    Soundararajan Krishnaswamy;Rajani Kanteti;Jonathan S. Duke-Cohan;Sivakumar Loganathan

  • Long-term outcome after resection for bronchial carcinoid tumors

    Mark K. Ferguson;Rodney J. Landreneau;Stephen R. Hazelrigg;Nasser K. Altorki

  • Oligo- and Polymetastatic Progression in Lung Metastasis(es) Patients Is Associated with Specific MicroRNAs

    Yves A. Lussier;Nikolai N. Khodarev;Kelly Regan;Kimberly Corbin

  • Mortality after Esophagectomy: Risk Factor Analysis

    Mark K. Ferguson;Terri R. Martin;Laurie B. Reeder;Jemi Olak

Frequent Co-Authors

Everett E. Vokes
Everett E. Vokes University of Chicago
Harvey M. Golomb
Harvey M. Golomb University of Chicago
Ravi Salgia
Ravi Salgia City Of Hope National Medical Center
John Hart
John Hart University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Ralph R. Weichselbaum
Ralph R. Weichselbaum University of Chicago
Theodore Karrison
Theodore Karrison University of Chicago
Shu-Yuan Xiao
Shu-Yuan Xiao University of Chicago
Dirk De Ruysscher
Dirk De Ruysscher Maastricht University
Jean-Paul Sculier
Jean-Paul Sculier Université Libre de Bruxelles
Mark S. Allen
Mark S. Allen Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those inspired by the field of medicine but looking for flexible or alternative entry points, there are several online degrees and career pathways to consider. Many healthcare professionals begin their journey as registered nurses and later advance their careers. If you’re a licensed RN, online rn-bsn programs without clinicals can help you earn a bachelor’s degree with minimal disruption to your work schedule.

For nurses aiming for advanced practice roles, adn to fnp programs offer a streamlined path from an associate degree in nursing to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP). Those interested in leadership and administration can explore cahme accredited online mha programs to prepare for management roles in healthcare organizations.

Alternatively, if you’re drawn to preventative health and wellness, an online bs in nutrition can open pathways in healthcare, education, and community wellness. Online programs offer flexibility for working professionals and those seeking to balance studies with other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Mark K. Ferguson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles