World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
32
Citations
5334
World Ranking
9603
National Ranking
3444

Anthony R. Buda publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony R. Buda sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 111 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Anthony R. Buda D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony R. Buda sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - JEQ Associate Editor-Editor's Citation of Excellence Award, American Society of Agronomy

Overview

Anthony R. Buda is affiliated with the Agricultural Research Service in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within Environmental Science, with significant contributions in related subfields including Environmental Chemistry, Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology, Plant Science, and Environmental Engineering.

The research topics covered extensively by Buda include Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal, Phosphorus and nutrient management, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, as well as Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods. This diverse expertise reflects a multidisciplinary approach to environmental studies focused on water quality and ecosystem management.

Buda has a record of publication in several scientific journals, notably:

  • Journal of Environmental Quality
  • Journal of Hydrology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Hydrological Processes
  • Environmental Modelling & Software

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on modeling and analyzing water resource processes and nutrient fluxes. Key publications include:

  • "Comparison of short-term streamflow forecasting using stochastic time series, neural networks, process-based, and Bayesian models" (2020, Environmental Modelling & Software)
  • "Using Particle Tracking to Understand Flow Paths, Age Distributions, and the Paradoxical Origins of the Inverse Storage Effect in an Experimental Catchment" (2020, Water Resources Research)
  • "Critical Review of Polyphosphate and Polyphosphate Accumulating Organisms for Agricultural Water Quality Management" (2021, Environmental Science & Technology)
  • "Comparative analysis of water budgets across the U.S. long-term agroecosystem research network" (2020, Journal of Hydrology)
  • "Uncertainty in phosphorus fluxes and budgets across the US long-term agroecosystem research network" (2023, Journal of Environmental Quality)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Buda include Casey D. Kennedy, David Millar, Amy S. Collick, Amy L. Shober, and Adrian R. H. Wiegman. These collaborations indicate ongoing joint work in environmental and agricultural science research areas.

In terms of recognition, Buda received the JEQ Associate Editor-Editor's Citation of Excellence Award from the American Society of Agronomy in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Phosphorus legacy: overcoming the effects of past management practices to mitigate future water quality impairment.

    Andrew Sharpley;Helen P. Jarvie;Anthony Buda;Linda May

  • Ecosystem resilience despite large-scale altered hydroclimatic conditions

    Guillermo E. Ponce Campos;M. Susan Moran;Alfredo Huete;Yongguang Zhang

  • Managing agricultural phosphorus for water quality protection: principles for progress

    Peter J. A. Kleinman;Andrew N. Sharpley;Richard W. McDowell;Don N. Flaten

  • Water quality remediation faces unprecedented challenges from "legacy phosphorus".

    Helen P. Jarvie;Andrew N. Sharpley;Bryan Spears;Anthony R. Buda

  • Application of manure to no-till soils: phosphorus losses by sub-surface and surface pathways

    Peter J. A. Kleinman;Andrew N. Sharpley;Lou S. Saporito;Anthony R. Buda

  • Soil controls of phosphorus in runoff: Management barriers and opportunities

    Unknown

  • Effect of tillage on macropore flow and phosphorus transport to tile drains

    Mark R. Williams;Kevin W. King;William Ford;Anthony R. Buda

  • Critical source area management of agricultural phosphorus: experiences, challenges and opportunities

    Andrew N. Sharpley;Peter J. A. Kleinman;Don N. Flaten;Anthony R. Buda

  • Dynamics of stream nitrate sources and flow pathways during stormflows on urban, forest and agricultural watersheds in central Pennsylvania, USA

    Anthony R. Buda;David R. DeWalle

  • Using flue gas desulfurization gypsum to remove dissolved phosphorus from agricultural drainage waters.

    Ray B. Bryant;Anthony R. Buda;Peter J.A. Kleinman;Clinton D. Church

  • Effects of hydrology and field management on phosphorus transport in surface runoff.

    Anthony R. Buda;Peter J.A. Kleinman;M.S. Srinivasan;Ray B. Bryant

  • Emerging technologies for removing nonpoint phosphorus from surface water and groundwater: introduction.

    Anthony R. Buda;Gerwin F. Koopmans;Ray B. Bryant;Wim J. Chardon

  • Extreme precipitation patterns and reductions of terrestrial ecosystem production across biomes

    Yongguang Zhang;Yongguang Zhang;M. Susan Moran;Mark A. Nearing;Guillermo E. Ponce Campos

  • Simulating hydrological and nonpoint source pollution processes in a karst watershed: A variable source area hydrology model evaluation

    M.G. Mostofa Amin;Tamie L. Veith;Amy S. Collick;Heather D. Karsten

  • Comparison of short-term streamflow forecasting using stochastic time series, neural networks, process-based, and Bayesian models

    Moges B. Wagena;Dustin Goering;Amy S. Collick;Emily M. Bock

  • Factors influencing surface runoff generation from two agricultural hillslopes in central Pennsylvania

    Anthony R. Buda;Peter J. A. Kleinman;M. S. Srinivasan;Ray B. Bryant

  • Predicting phosphorus dynamics in complex terrains using a variable source area hydrology model

    Amy S. Collick;Daniel R. Fuka;Peter J. A. Kleinman;Anthony R. Buda

  • Phosphorus and the Chesapeake Bay: Lingering Issues and Emerging Concerns for Agriculture.

    Peter J. A. Kleinman;Rosemary M. Fanelli;Robert M. Hirsch;Anthony R. Buda

  • Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production.

    Kpoti M. Gunn;Michael A. Holly;Tamie L. Veith;Anthony R. Buda

  • Critical Review of Polyphosphate and Polyphosphate Accumulating Organisms for Agricultural Water Quality Management

    Sheila M. Saia;Hunter J. Carrick;Anthony R. Buda;John M. Regan

  • Groundwater flow path dynamics and nitrogen transport potential in the riparian zone of an agricultural headwater catchment

    Mark R. Williams;Anthony R. Buda;Herschel A. Elliott;James Hamlett

  • Predicting phosphorus dynamics in complex terrains using a variable source area hydrology model INTRODUCTION

    Amy S. Collick;Daniel R. Fuka;Peter J. A. Kleinman;Anthony R. Buda

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter J. A. Kleinman
Peter J. A. Kleinman Agricultural Research Service
Amy S. Collick
Amy S. Collick University of Maryland Eastern Shore
David R. DeWalle
David R. DeWalle Pennsylvania State University
David D. Bosch
David D. Bosch Agricultural Research Service
Andrew N. Sharpley
Andrew N. Sharpley University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Zachary M. Easton
Zachary M. Easton Virginia Tech
Elizabeth W. Boyer
Elizabeth W. Boyer Pennsylvania State University
Debra P. C. Peters
Debra P. C. Peters United States Department of Agriculture
Alfredo Huete
Alfredo Huete University of Technology Sydney
Stacey A. Gunter
Stacey A. Gunter Agricultural Research Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, there are numerous online degree options that complement this field. Programs such as online eds to edd programs offer advanced education leadership credentials, which can be valuable for environmental educators or policy advocates aiming to influence change at institutional levels.

Professionals seeking to integrate social work aspects into environmental health and community support might explore dsw programs. These accredited programs prepare graduates for leadership roles in social services, complementing environmental justice efforts.

For a broader knowledge base that supports interdisciplinary approaches, pursuing an accredited affordable online general studies degree can provide flexibility and foundational skills relevant across multiple sectors related to environmental sciences.

Additionally, for those looking for less intensive pathways or to build prerequisites for advanced study, investigating the easiest degree to get options online can offer practical entry points into environmental careers or related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony R. Buda

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles