World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
18683
World Ranking
6992
National Ranking
3063

Johan de Kleer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johan de Kleer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 178 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Johan de Kleer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johan de Kleer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1990 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)

Overview

Johan de Kleer is affiliated with the Palo Alto Research Center in the United States, contributing extensively to the fields of Computer Science and Engineering. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Software, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

Their main research topics include Fault Detection and Control Systems, AI-based Problem Solving and Planning, Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques, Risk and Safety Analysis, Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation, and Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence.

Johan de Kleer has published work in a number of renowned venues, with frequent appearances in arXiv (Cornell University), Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Annual Conference of the PHM Society, IEEE Control Systems, and the International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Empirical Evaluation of Diagnostic Algorithm Performance Using a Generic Framework (2021) in International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management
  • Efficient Model-Based Diagnosis of Sequential Circuits (2020) in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Controlling Draft Interactions Between Quadcopter Unmanned Aerial Vehicles with Physics-aware Modeling (2020) in Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
  • System Resilience through Health Monitoring and Reconfiguration (2023) in ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems
  • A domain-independent agent architecture for adaptive operation in evolving open worlds (2024) in Artificial Intelligence

Throughout their career, Johan de Kleer has collaborated frequently with other researchers, including Ion Matei, Alexander Feldman, Maksym Zhenirovskyy, Rahul Rai, and Alexandre Perez.

In recognition of their contributions to artificial intelligence, they were named a Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) in 1990.

Best Publications

  • Diagnosing multiple faults

    J de Kleer;B C Williams

  • A qualitative physics based on confluences

    Johan De Kleer;John Seely Brown

  • An Assumption-Based TMS

    Unknown

  • Readings in qualitative reasoning about physical systems

    Daniel S. Weld;Johan de Kleer

  • Readings in Model-Based Diagnosis

    Walter Hamscher;Luca Console;Johan de Kleer

  • Characterizing diagnoses and systems

    Johan de Kleer;Alan K. Mackworth;Raymond Reiter

  • Qualitative Simulation *

    Unknown

  • Diagnosis with behavioral modes

    Johan De Kleer;Brian C. Williams

  • Building problem solvers

    Kenneth D. Forbus;Johan de Kleer

  • Found ations of assumption-based truth maintenance systems: preliminary report

    Raymond Reiter;Johan de Kleer

  • How circuits work

    Johan De Kleer

  • Problem solving with the ATMS

    Johan de Kleer

  • Extending the ATMS

    Johan de Kleer

  • A comparison of ATMS and CSP techniques

    Johan De Kleer

  • Theories of causal ordering

    Johan de Kleer;John Seely Brown

  • Focusing on probable diagnoses

    Johan de Kleer

  • Fundamentals of model-based diagnosis

    Johan de Kleer;James Kurien

  • Choices without backtracking

    Johan de Kleer

  • Using crude probability estimates to guide diagnosis

    Johan de Kleer

  • Causal and Teleological Reasoning In Circuit Recognition

    Johan de Kleer

  • Multiples representations of knowledge in a mechanics problem-solver

    Johan de Kleer

  • Reasoning about multiple faults

    Johan de Kleer;Brian C. Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel G. Bobrow
Daniel G. Bobrow Palo Alto Research Center
Kenneth D. Forbus
Kenneth D. Forbus Northwestern University
John Seely Brown
John Seely Brown Palo Alto Research Center
Rui Abreu
Rui Abreu University of Porto
Raymond Reiter
Raymond Reiter University of Toronto
Guy L. Steele
Guy L. Steele Oracle (United States)
Alan K. Mackworth
Alan K. Mackworth University of British Columbia
Eric Saund
Eric Saund IEEE-USA

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science can open doors to many other lucrative and in-demand fields. For those interested in law and technology, pursuing a masters in criminology online can be an excellent complement, offering insights into cybersecurity and digital forensics.

Budget is often a concern for students considering further education. It’s crucial to compare the cost of accounting degree online programs, especially for those wanting a strong foundation in financial management or data analysis.

There’s also growing overlap between computer science and analytics. Many are opting for data science programs, which focus on big data, machine learning, and AI—skills highly sought after in today’s tech-driven industries.

If you’re interested in bridging technical knowledge with project management, a construction management degree can blend computing skills with real-world applications in engineering and design.

These pathways showcase how computer science knowledge can diversify your career opportunities across sectors like law, business, analytics, and management, both online and on campus.

Best Scientists Citing Johan de Kleer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles