World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Business and Management
Denmark
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 45 1246 1163 10 10 119 22931

Keld Laursen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Keld Laursen between 1996 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Keld Laursen published across 30 years, from 1996 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2012. 3 of the 125 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2012. 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1996 2025

125 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Keld Laursen: publications per year, 1996 to 2025
Year Publications
1996 2
1997 3
1998 4
1999 7
2000 5
2001 2
2002 2
2003 3
2004 5
2005 6
2006 1
2007 2
2008 4
2009 3
2010 4
2011 6
2012 11
2013 8
2014 7
2015 4
2016 7
2017 4
2018 6
2019 3
2020 3
2021 5
2022 3
2023 2
2024 2
2025 1
Total 125
Download as CSV

Keld Laursen publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keld Laursen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 115–119 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 119 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97 119
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Keld Laursen D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keld Laursen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63 45
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Business and Management in Denmark Leader Award

Overview

Keld Laursen is affiliated with Copenhagen Business School in Denmark. Their research primarily spans fields related to Business, Management and Accounting as well as Economics, Econometrics and Finance.

Within these main fields, their work includes several subfields of study such as Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Accounting, and Computer Science Applications. Their scholarly contributions focus on topics including Firm Innovation and Growth, Innovation and Knowledge Management, Innovation Policy and R&D, Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences, Private Equity and Venture Capital, Open Source Software Innovations, and Climate Change Policy and Economics.

Laursen has published multiple papers across various respected academic venues. Recent publications include:

  • Inbound Open Innovation and Innovation Performance: A Robustness Study, 2021, Research Policy
  • Mounting Corporate Innovation Performance: The Effects of High-Skilled Migrant Hires and Integration Capacity, 2020, Research Policy
  • Who Captures Value from Open Innovation - The Firm or Its Employees?, 2020, Strategic Management Review
  • What We Know about Open Innovation, Unresolved Issues, and a Checklist for Future Research, 2023, Journal of Industrial and Business Economics
  • Examining the Influence of Competition Networks Structure on Firm's Out-Licensing Strategy, 2022, Academy of Management Proceedings

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Laursen include:

  • Ammon Salter
  • Mark Vancauteren
  • Yuan Shi
  • Bart Leten
  • Ngoc Hân Nguyen

The main venues where Laursen has published work include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Research Policy
  • Strategic Management Review
  • Journal of Industrial and Business Economics

Keld Laursen's research reflects a sustained focus on innovation dynamics within firms and industries, particularly concerning open innovation practices, the role of skilled migrants in corporate innovation, and value capture mechanisms. Their contributions also engage with broader themes of entrepreneurship, venture capital, and policy impacts related to innovation ecosystems.

Best Publications

  • Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms

    Keld Laursen;Ammon Salter

  • Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?

    Keld Laursen;Ammon Salter

  • New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance

    Keld Laursen;Nicolai Juul Foss

  • The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration

    Keld Laursen;Keld Laursen;Ammon J. Salter

  • The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis

    Marcel Bogers;Ann Kristin Zobel;Allan Afuah;Esteve Almirall

  • Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization

    Keld Laursen

  • Linking Customer Interaction and Innovation: The Mediating Role of New Organizational Practices

    Nicolai J. Foss;Keld Laursen;Torben Pedersen

  • Structural Change in OECD Export Specialisation Patterns: de-specialisation and ‘stickiness’

    Bent Dalum;Keld Laursen;Gert Villumsen

  • Exploring the Effect of Geographical Proximity and University Quality on University–Industry Collaboration in the United Kingdom

    Keld Laursen;Toke Reichstein;Ammon Salter

  • Regions Matter: How Localized Social Capital Affects Innovation and External Knowledge Acquisition

    Keld Laursen;Francesca Masciarelli;Andrea Prencipe

  • Keep searching and you’ll find: what do we know about variety creation through firms’ search activities for innovation?

    Keld Laursen;Keld Laursen

  • The Importance of Sectoral Differences in the Application of Complementary HRM Practices for Innovation Performance

    Keld Laursen

  • Knowledge strategies, firm types, and complementarity in human-resource practices

    Keld Laursen;Volker Mahnke

  • The role of lead users in knowledge sharing

    Lars Bo Jeppesen;Keld Laursen

  • Performance Pay, Delegation and Multitasking under Uncertainty and Innovativeness: An Empirical Investigation

    Nicolai Juul Foss;Keld Laursen

  • Technological exploration through licensing: new insights from the licensee’s point of view

    Keld Laursen;Maria Isabella Leone;Salvatore Torrisi

  • Revealed Comparative Advantage and the Alternatives as Measures of International Specialisation

    Keld Laursen

  • The impact of R&D offshoring on the home knowledge production of OECD investing regions

    Lorena M. D’Agostino;Keld Laursen;Keld Laursen;Grazia D. Santangelo

  • Trade specialisation, technology and economic growth

    Keld Laursen

  • Human Resource Management Practices and Innovation

    Keld Laursen;Nicolai Juul Foss

  • The Impact of Technological Opportunity on the Dynamics of Trade Performance

    Keld Laursen

  • Do export and technological specialisation patterns co-evolve in terms of convergence or divergence? Evidence from 19 OECD countries, 1971-1991

    Keld Laursen

  • The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms

    Keld Laursen;Ammon Salter

Frequent Co-Authors

Ammon Salter
Ammon Salter University of Warwick
Marcel Bogers
Marcel Bogers Eindhoven University of Technology
Nicolai Juul Foss
Nicolai Juul Foss Copenhagen Business School
Grazia D. Santangelo
Grazia D. Santangelo Copenhagen Business School
Mats Magnusson
Mats Magnusson Royal Institute of Technology
John Hagedoorn
John Hagedoorn Royal Holloway University of London
Satish Nambisan
Satish Nambisan Case Western Reserve University
Annabelle Gawer
Annabelle Gawer University of Surrey
Frank T. Piller
Frank T. Piller RWTH Aachen University
Ann Majchrzak
Ann Majchrzak University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Business and Management in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career pathways. Many students choose to specialize in fields that blend leadership, analytics, and industry expertise.

For those interested in the business side of healthcare, healthcare administration degrees are gaining traction. These programs equip students for management roles within hospitals and medical organizations. For a more advanced focus, a masters in healthcare administration offers deeper insights into policy, finance, and strategic decision-making in the healthcare sector.

Strong financial management is vital in any industry, making an accredited online accounting degree a solid choice for aspiring accountants and business managers alike. Meanwhile, the adoption of technology in business is booming, and degrees in ai prepare graduates to lead in fields that leverage data, automation, and innovation.

Choosing an online degree can increase flexibility and access, while still providing robust opportunities for career advancement in a wide array of business disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Keld Laursen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles