World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
16414
World Ranking
10654
National Ranking
4631

Ruin Moaddel publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruin Moaddel sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 264 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ruin Moaddel D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruin Moaddel sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ruin Moaddel is a researcher affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their work spans primarily the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions in related subfields such as physiology, molecular biology, pharmacology, biological psychiatry, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Their research topics focus on areas that include the treatment of major depression, tryptophan and brain disorders, diet and metabolism studies, mitochondrial function and pathology, metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies, adipose tissue and metabolism, as well as neuroscience and neuropharmacology research.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Proteomics in aging research: A roadmap to clinical, translational research (2021, Aging Cell)

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Luigi Ferrucci, Todd D. Gould, Jacqueline Lovett, Julián Candia, and Toshiko Tanaka. These collaborations reflect ongoing partnerships within interdisciplinary contexts relevant to their main research topics and fields.

Moaddel's work has been published extensively in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Aging Cell, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, The Journals of Gerontology Series A, and Metabolomics, indicating a focus on aging, biomedical analysis, and metabolic research themes.

Their published outputs show a consistent interest in aging and metabolism, combined with molecular and pharmacological approaches. This includes the use of proteomics and metabolomics techniques, which are central to several of the listed publication venues and research topics.

Best Publications

  • NMDAR inhibition-independent antidepressant actions of ketamine metabolites

    Panos Zanos;Ruin Moaddel;Patrick J. Morris;Polymnia Georgiou

  • SIRT1 Is Required for AMPK Activation and the Beneficial Effects of Resveratrol on Mitochondrial Function

    Nathan L. Price;Ana P. Gomes;Alvin J.Y. Ling;Filipe V. Duarte

  • Ketamine and Ketamine Metabolite Pharmacology: Insights into Therapeutic Mechanisms

    Panos Zanos;Ruin Moaddel;Patrick J. Morris;Lace M. Riggs

  • Plasma proteomic signature of age in healthy humans.

    Toshiko Tanaka;Angelique Biancotto;Ruin Moaddel;Ann Zenobia Moore

  • A High-Fat Diet and NAD+ Activate Sirt1 to Rescue Premature Aging in Cockayne Syndrome

    Morten Scheibye-Knudsen;Sarah J. Mitchell;Sarah J. Mitchell;Evandro F. Fang;Teruaki Iyama

  • Child Stunting is Associated with Low Circulating Essential Amino Acids

    Richard D. Semba;Michelle Shardell;Fayrouz A. Sakr Ashour;Ruin Moaddel

  • Relationship of Ketamine’s Plasma Metabolites with Response, Diagnosis, and Side Effects in Major Depression

    Carlos A. Zarate;Nancy Brutsche;Gonzalo Laje;David A. Luckenbaugh

  • Resveratrol improves adipose insulin signaling and reduces the inflammatory response in adipose tissue of rhesus monkeys on high-fat, high-sugar diet

    Yolanda Jimenez-Gomez;Julie A. Mattison;Kevin J. Pearson;Kevin J. Pearson;Alejandro Martin-Montalvo

  • Ketamine has distinct electrophysiological and behavioral effects in depressed and healthy subjects

    Allison C. Nugent;Elizabeth D. Ballard;Todd D. Gould;Lawrence T. Park

  • Discovery proteomics in aging human skeletal muscle finds change in spliceosome, immunity, proteostasis and mitochondria

    Ceereena Ubaida-Mohien;Alexey Lyashkov;Marta Gonzalez-Freire;Ravi Tharakan

  • High-potency ligands for DREADD imaging and activation in rodents and monkeys

    Jordi Bonaventura;Mark A. G. Eldridge;Feng Hu;Juan L. Gomez

  • Sub-anesthetic concentrations of (R,S)-ketamine metabolites inhibit acetylcholine-evoked currents in α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

    Ruin Moaddel;Galia Abdrakhmanova;Joanna Kozak;Krzysztof Jozwiak

  • Antidepressant-relevant concentrations of the ketamine metabolite (2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine do not block NMDA receptor function

    Eric W. Lumsden;Timothy A. Troppoli;Scott J. Myers;Panos Zanos

  • Cannabinoids Inhibit Insulin Receptor Signaling in Pancreatic β-Cells

    Wook Kim;Máire E. Doyle;Zhuo Liu;Qizong Lao

  • Inhibition of Breast Cancer Metastasis by Resveratrol-Mediated Inactivation of Tumor-Evoked Regulatory B Cells

    Catalina Lee-Chang;Monica Bodogai;Alejandro Martin-Montalvo;Katarzyna Wejksza

  • Resveratrol Prevents β-Cell Dedifferentiation in Nonhuman Primates Given a High-Fat/High-Sugar Diet

    Jennifer L. Fiori;Yu Kyong Shin;Yu Kyong Shin;Wook Kim;Wook Kim;Susan M. Krzysik-Walker

  • Simultaneous population pharmacokinetic modelling of ketamine and three major metabolites in patients with treatment‐resistant bipolar depression

    Xiaochen Zhao;Swarajya Lakshmi Vattem Venkata;Ruin Moaddel;Dave A. Luckenbaugh

  • Uniformly-sized, molecularly imprinted polymers for nicotine by precipitation polymerization.

    Haruyo Sambe;Kaori Hoshina;Ruin Moaddel;Irving W. Wainer

  • A parallel chiral-achiral liquid chromatographic method for the determination of the stereoisomers of ketamine and ketamine metabolites in the plasma and urine of patients with complex regional pain syndrome

    Ruin Moaddel;Swarajya Lakshmi Vattem Venkata;Mary J. Tanga;James E. Bupp

  • Comparison of analytical techniques for the identification of bioactive compounds from natural products

    Łukasz Cieśla;Łukasz Cieśla;Ruin Moaddel

Frequent Co-Authors

Luigi Ferrucci
Luigi Ferrucci National Institutes of Health
Carlos A. Zarate
Carlos A. Zarate National Institutes of Health
Richard D. Semba
Richard D. Semba Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Todd D. Gould
Todd D. Gould University of Maryland, Baltimore
Michel Bernier
Michel Bernier National Institutes of Health
Craig J. Thomas
Craig J. Thomas National Institutes of Health
Josephine M. Egan
Josephine M. Egan National Institutes of Health
Vilhelm A. Bohr
Vilhelm A. Bohr University of Copenhagen
Rafael de Cabo
Rafael de Cabo National Institutes of Health
Toshiko Tanaka
Toshiko Tanaka National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about Biology and Biochemistry, you’ll find several related online degrees and certifications that open diverse career opportunities in the U.S. Many students pursue advanced studies in human nutrition, and options like an online master's degree in nutrition are both flexible and affordable. This pathway offers the knowledge needed to support public health, wellness, and clinical nutrition careers.

For those interested in medical imaging, online sonography certificate programs provide essential technical training. These credentials can lead to fast-growing roles in healthcare facilities, helping diagnose disease using imaging technology. Another option is to enroll in radiology tech online programs, which prepare you for rewarding entry-level positions in hospitals and clinics.

If advanced nutritional science and patient care interest you, consider dietitian masters programs. Graduates often pursue careers as registered dietitians, clinical nutritionists, or pursue research roles. Exploring these online degrees is a smart way to expand your scientific expertise and secure future-focused career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Ruin Moaddel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles